RESUMO
Purpose: Mouthwash is used by a large population. Short-term clinical trials have shown that antibacterial mouthwash deplete oral nitrate-reducing bacteria, and decrease systemic nitric oxide bioavailability. Our previous publication from the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study (SOALS) was the first to show frequent over-the-counter mouthwash use was independently associated with increased risk of prediabetes/diabetes. This manuscript evaluates whether over-the-counter mouthwash was associated with increased risk of hypertension.Materials and methods: SOALS recruited 40-65 year old overweight/obese individuals; baseline evaluations started in 2011 and the 3-year follow-up exam was completed by 2016. From the 1028 participants (76%) who completed follow-up, we excluded people with reported physician diagnosis of hypertension or systolic or diastolic BP at or above the hypertension cut-offs (n = 481), missing smoking (n = 1), missing physical activity (n = 1) and missing alcohol intake (n = 5) at baseline; 540 participants were included. The primary exposure was mouthwash use twice daily or more. The primary outcome for this manuscript is self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension over the follow-up. We used Poisson regression controlling for age, sex, smoking, physical activity, waist circumference, alcohol intake, systolic blood pressure, pre-diabetes/diabetes status and cardiac medication use. We additionally evaluated other mouthwash use categorizations.Results: Twelve percent (66/540) developed hypertension over follow-up. People who used mouthwash twice/day or more had higher incidence of hypertension compared to less frequent users (Incidence Rate Ratio = 1.85; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.17, 2.94), and compared to non-users (IRR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.27, 3.71). Several additional potential confounders evaluated did not impact these associations. Associations persisted among never smokers. Additional outcomes including BP assessed at a single study visit did not show associations.Conclusion: In this study, frequent regular use of over-the-counter mouthwash was associated with increased risk of hypertension, independent of major risk factors for hypertension and several other potential confounders.
Assuntos
Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Pressão Sanguínea , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Boca/microbiologia , Antissépticos Bucais/efeitos adversos , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Bactérias/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Porto Rico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
This is the first longitudinal study evaluating whether adiposity is associated with inter-arm blood pressure difference. We evaluated 714 overweight/obese individuals aged 40-65 years over a 3-year follow-up. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured in both arms simultaneously using an automated machine. Linear regression assessed the associations of body mass index, fat %, waist, neck, thigh, and arm circumferences (cm), with absolute inter-arm differences in systolic (IAS) and diastolic (IAD) blood pressure (mm Hg). Poisson regression was used for binary outcomes (IAS and IAD ≥ 10 mm Hg). All models were adjusted for age, gender, smoking, physical activity, and HOMA-IR. Adiposity measures were associated with increased IAS and IAD (ß range: 0.09-0.20 and 0.09-0.30). Neck circumference showed the strongest association with IAS (ß = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.37) and IAD (ß = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.47); arm circumference showed a similar association with IAS, but lower with IAD. Highest quartiles of BMI, thigh, and arm showed significant associations with IAS (IRR: 2.21, 2.46 and 2.70). Highest quartiles of BMI, waist, neck, and arm circumferences were significantly associated with IAD (IRR: 2.38, 2.68, 4.50 and 2.24). If the associations are corroborated in other populations, adiposity may be an important modifiable risk factor for inter-arm blood pressure difference with a large potential public health impact.
Assuntos
Adiposidade/fisiologia , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Hipertensão/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Adulto , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Diástole/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sístole/fisiologia , Circunferência da Cintura/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether insulin resistance (IR) predicts the risk of oral inflammation, assessed as the number of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP) and number of teeth with probing pocket depths (PPD) ≥ 4 mm and BOP. METHODS: Data on 870 overweight/obese diabetes free adults, aged 40-65 years from the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study over a three-year period, was analyzed. Baseline IR, assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) index, was divided into tertiles. BOP was assessed at buccal and lingual sites, and PPD at six sites per tooth. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate the risk ratios (RRs) for oral inflammation adjusted for baseline age, gender, smoking status, alcohol intake, education, physical activity, waist circumference, mean plaque index, and baseline number of sites with BOP, or number of teeth with PPD≥4 mm and BOP. The potential impact of tertiles of serum TNF-α and adiponectin on the IR-oral inflammation association was also assessed in a subsample of 597 participants. RESULTS: Participants in the highest HOMA-IR tertile at baseline had significantly higher numbers of sites with BOP [RR = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.36] and number of teeth with PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP (RR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09-1.78) at follow-up, compared with individuals in the lower two HOMA-IR tertiles. Neither TNF-α nor adiponectin confounded the associations. CONCLUSION: IR significantly predicts gingival/periodontal inflammation in this population.
Assuntos
Gengivite , Resistência à Insulina , Dente , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Inflamação , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compare glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ) diagnostic tests for prediabetes and diabetes with plasma glucose criteria and compare the metabolic profiles of people classified by HbA1c versus by glucose levels. METHODS: Participants were recruited for the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study. The participants were primarily Hispanic (98%), without previously diagnosed diabetes, and aged 40 to 65 years. Participants classified as normal glycemic, prediabetes, or diabetes on the basis of baseline HbA1c and plasma glucose criteria were compared with respect to baseline cardiometabolic factors. RESULTS: The 1342 participants had a mean age of 50.5 ± 6.8 years and 28% were men. Thirty-one percent were diagnosed with prediabetes by plasma glucose criteria and 53.4% by HbA1c , and 8.1% were diagnosed with diabetes by plasma glucose criteria and 6.3% by HbA1c ; overall concordance rate was 55.1%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of HbA1c compared to plasma glucose criteria was 0.62 for impaired glucose and 0.76 for diabetes. A worse cardiometabolic profile was seen within subgroups that met HbA1c and plasma glucose criteria for diabetes or prediabetes. Those diagnosed with prediabetes by plasma glucose criteria had significantly higher systolic blood pressure and higher homeostatic model assessment than those diagnosed using HbA1c . Participants diagnosed with diabetes by plasma glucose criteria had lower body mass index, smaller waist circumference, and lower insulinogenic and disposition indices, but higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, than those diagnosed by HbA1c . CONCLUSIONS: Low concordance was seen between HbA1c and glucose measurements. The HbA1c is not a good test for prediabetes but shows reasonable validity for diabetes in this high-risk predominantly female Hispanic population. People classified by HbA1c , plasma glucose criteria, or both show different metabolic profiles; a combined test may be ideal.
Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologia , Sobrepeso/sangue , Estado Pré-Diabético/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Pré-Diabético/sangue , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
This paper evaluates neck circumference as a metabolic risk marker. Overweight/obese, nondiabetic Hispanics, 40-65 years old, who are free of major cardiovascular diseases, were recruited for the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study (SOALS). Baseline exams were completed by 1,206 participants. Partial correlation coefficients (r) and logistic models adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, and physical activity were computed. Neck circumference was significantly correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.64), BMI (r = 0.66), and body fat % (r = 0.45). Neck circumference, highest (compared to lowest) tertile, had higher association with prediabetes: multivariable OR = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.71-3.06) compared to waist circumference OR = 1.97 (95% CI: 1.48-2.66) and other anthropometric measures. Neck circumference showed higher associations with HOMA, low HDL-C, and triglycerides, multivariable OR = 8.42 (95% CI: 5.43-13.06), 2.41 (95% CI: 1.80-3.21), and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.14-2.03), but weaker associations with hs-CRP and hypertension, OR = 3.61 (95% CI: 2.66-4.90) and OR = 2.58 (95% CI: 1.90-3.49), compared to waist circumference. AIC for model fit was generally similar for neck or waist circumference. Neck circumference showed similar or better associations with metabolic factors and is more practicable than waist circumference. Hence, neck circumference may be a better alternative to waist circumference.
Assuntos
Adiposidade , Antropometria/métodos , Pescoço/patologia , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/patologia , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Circunferência da CinturaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The effects of lipid-lowering agents (LLA) on reducing systemic and oral inflammation have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of LLA use with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and oral inflammation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using baseline data from 1300 overweight/obese participants aged 40-65 years, recruited for the ongoing San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study. Serum hs-CRP was measured by ELISA, gingival/periodontal inflammation was evaluated as bleeding upon probing (BOP), and LLA was self-reported. Separate logistic models were performed for systemic and oral inflammation. RESULTS: In all, 24% participants reported history of dyslipidaemia, of which, 50.3% self-reported LLA use. Sixty percent of the participants had elevated hs-CRP (>3 mg/dl) and 50% had high BOP (defined as at or above the median: 21%). After adjusting for age, gender, smoking, HDL-C, physical activity, diabetes, blood pressure medications, and percent body fat composition, LLA users had significantly lower odds of elevated hs-CRP compared to LLA non-users (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.39-0.85). After adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, educational level, mean plaque index and percent body fat, LLA users had significantly lower odds of high BOP compared to LLA non-users (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Lipid-lowering agents may reduce both systemic and oral inflammatory responses.
Assuntos
Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Adulto , Idoso , Proteína C-Reativa , Estudos Transversais , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Inflamação , Lipídeos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between measures of adiposity and periodontitis among older Puerto Rican adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 147 representative adults ≥70 years living in the San Juan metropolitan area. Height, weight, waist circumference (WC), and hip circumference were measured by trained personnel. Periodontal probing depth and attachment loss (AL) were measured by calibrated examiners. Periodontitis was classified according to the Center for Disease Control/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC-AAP) definitions and using tertiles of mean AL and percent of sites with AL ≥3 mm. Multivariable polytomous logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, smoking, education, diabetes status, physical activity, and total fruit and vegetable intake were used to model associations between WC, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and periodontitis. RESULTS: High WC (men: ≥102 cm versus <102 cm, women: ≥88 cm versus <88 cm) compared with normal showed nonsignificant associations with severe (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 0.76-8.67), moderate periodontitis (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.65-3.60), and upper tertile of mean AL (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 0.83-6.23). Elevated WHR versus normal (men: ≥0.95 versus <0.95, women: ≥0.88 versus <0.88) was associated with moderate periodontitis (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.01-5.52) and showed a borderline significant association with the upper tertile of mean AL (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 0.96-6.63, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Central adiposity was associated with a greater risk of periodontitis in this population of older adults, although analyses were underpowered. These results hold important public health implications given the high prevalence of adiposity and periodontitis among older adults.