RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) develops from vasoactive substances released by neuroendocrine tumors, which can cause significant patient morbidity and mortality without surgical intervention. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate granular perioperative details and long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Electronic search of Ovid, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed to examine surgical treatment of carcinoid disease. Nine articles comprising 416 patients were selected. Study-level data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years (95% confidence interval, 57-70) with 53% (95% confidence interval, 46-61) of patients being male. In addition, 75% (95% confidence interval, 54-96) of neuroendocrine tumors originated from the small bowel or colon and 98% (95% confidence interval, 93-100) had liver metastases. Right heart failure was present in 48% (95% confidence interval, 14-81). Moderate or severe regurgitation was present in 97% (95% confidence interval, 95-99) of tricuspid and 72% (95% confidence interval, 58-83) of pulmonary valves. In addition, 99% (95% confidence interval, 98-100) of tricuspid and 59% (95% confidence interval, 38-79) of pulmonary valves were replaced. Bioprosthetic valves were used in 80% (95% confidence interval, 68-93) of tricuspid positions. Mean hospital duration of stay was 16 days (95% confidence interval, 7-25). Thirty-day mortality was 9% (95% confidence interval, 6-12). Mean follow-up was 25 months (95% confidence interval, 11-39). Median survival was 3 years (95% confidence interval, 2.5-3.5). CONCLUSION: For patients >18 years of age, surgical treatment of carcinoid heart disease can be performed with a reasonable safety profile. However, overall survival appears to have ongoing effects of the primary disease.
Assuntos
Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/cirurgia , Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/diagnóstico , Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/mortalidade , HumanosRESUMO
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of concomitant mitral valve surgery for significant preexisting mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. Electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature examining concurrent mitral valve surgery in patients with CF-LVAD implantation. Identified articles were systematically assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 2319 studies identified, 8 studies were included. Among 445 patients with moderate to severe or severe MR, 113 (25.4%) patients received concurrent mitral valvular intervention during CF-LVAD implantation. There were no significant differences in cardiopulmonary bypass time (MR Surgery 154 min vs. no MR Surgery 119 min, P = 0.64) or hospital length of stay (MR Surgery 21 days vs. no MR Surgery 18 days, P = 0.93). On follow-up, there were no significant differences in freedom from greater than moderate MR (MR Surgery 100% vs. no MR Surgery 74%, P = 0.12) or left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (MR Surgery: 60 mm vs. no MR Surgery 65 mm, P = 0.51). Survival was comparable at 6-months (MR Surgery 77% vs. no MR Surgery 81%, P = 0.75), 1-year (MR Surgery 72% vs. no MR Surgery 80%, P = 0.36), and 2-years of follow-up (MR Surgery 65% vs. no MR Surgery 70%, P = 0.56). The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 studies consisting of 445 patients demonstrates that the addition of mitral valve intervention to CF-LVAD implantation appears to be safe with comparable survival to those undergoing CF-LVAD implantation alone. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate whether concomitant mitral valve intervention during CF-LVAD implantation in patients with severe MR is necessary.