Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 14(2): e007256, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33530698

RESUMO

Background The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become a common medical option for patients with end-stage heart failure. Although patients' chances of survival may increase with an LVAD compared with medical therapy, the LVAD poses many risks and requires major lifestyle changes, thus making it a complex medical decision. Our prior work found that a decision aid for LVADs significantly increased decision quality for both patients and caregivers and was successfully implemented at 6 LVAD programs. Methods In follow-up, we are conducting a nationwide dissemination and implementation project, with the goal of implementing the decision aid at as many of the 176 LVAD programs in the United States as possible. Guided by the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations, the project consists of 4 phases: (1) building a network; (2) promoting adoption; (3) supporting implementation; and (4) encouraging maintenance. Developing an LVAD network of contacts occurs by using a national baseline survey of LVAD clinicians, existing professional relationships, and an internet-based strategy. A suite of resources targeted to promote adoption and support implementation of the decision aid into standard LVAD education processes are provided to the network. Evaluation is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework, where clinician and patient surveys and qualitative interviews determine the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance achieved. Conclusions This project is a true dissemination study in that it targets the entire population of LVAD programs in the United States and is unique in its use of social marketing principles to promote adoption and implementation. The implementation plan is intended to serve as a test case and model for dissemination and implementation of other evidence-based decision support aids and strategies.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Ventrículos do Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Cuidadores , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos
3.
J Pediatr ; 227: 60-68, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681988

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the experiences and beliefs of pediatric transplant stakeholders regarding factors that contribute to low pretransplant immunization rates. STUDY DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with transplant team members (hepatologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, transplant nurse coordinators, and transplant infectious diseases physicians), primary care physicians, and parents of heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients at 3 geographically diverse large pediatric transplant centers in the US. Interviews were conducted between July 2017 and February 2020 until thematic saturation was reached within each stakeholder subgroup. Content analysis methodology was used to identify themes. RESULTS: Stakeholders participated in 30- to 60-minute interviews (16 transplant subspecialists, 3 transplant infectious diseases physicians, 11 transplant nurse coordinators, 12 primary care physicians, and 40 parents). Five central themes emerged: (1) gaps in knowledge about timing and safety of pretransplant immunizations, (2) lack of communication, coordination, and follow-up between team members regarding immunizations, (3) lack of centralized immunization records, (4) subspecialty clinic functioning as the medical home for transplant candidates but unable to provide all needed immunizations, and (5) differences between organ type in prioritization and completion of pretransplant immunization. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple factors that contribute to low immunization rates among pediatric transplant candidates. New tools are needed to overcome these barriers and increase immunization rates in transplant candidates.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Imunização/psicologia , Transplante de Órgãos/métodos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Imunização/métodos , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Período Pré-Operatório , Pesquisa Qualitativa
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(7): 645-651, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985605

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about how clinicians make the complex decision regarding whether to place an intracranial pressure monitor in children with traumatic brain injury. The objective of this study was to identify the decisional needs of multidisciplinary clinician stakeholders. DESIGN: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians who regularly care for children with traumatic brain injury. SETTING: One U.S. level I pediatric trauma center. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight clinicians including 17 ICU nurses, advanced practice providers, and physicians and 11 pediatric surgeons and neurosurgeons interviewed between August 2017 and February 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 43 years (range, 30-66 yr), mean experience of 10 years (range, 0-30 yr), were 46% female (13/28), and 96% white (27/28). A novel conceptual model emerged that related the difficulty of the decision about intracranial pressure monitor placement (y-axis) with the estimated outcome of the patient (x-axis). This model had a bimodal shape, with the most difficult decisions occurring for patients who 1) had a good opportunity for recovery but whose neurologic examination had not yet normalized or 2) had a low but uncertain likelihood of neurologically functional recovery. Emergent themes included gaps in medical knowledge and information available for decision-making, differences in perspective between clinical specialties, and ethical implications of decision-making about intracranial pressure monitoring. Experienced clinicians described less difficulty with decision-making overall. CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe traumatic brain injury near perceived transition points along a spectrum of potential for recovery present challenges for decision-making about intracranial pressure monitor placement. Clinician experience and specialty discipline further influence decision-making. These findings will contribute to the design of a multidisciplinary clinical decision support tool for intracranial pressure monitor placement in children with traumatic brain injury.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/fisiopatologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Pressão Intracraniana , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Pediatria , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica , Neurocirurgiões , Pesquisa Qualitativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA