RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence of recurrent glenohumeral instability in patients over 40 years with isolated rotator cuff (RC) repair for traumatic shoulder dislocation. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for glenohumeral recurrence after RC repair and to describe the causes and incidences of re-intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data of consecutive patients at a single trauma center between January 2014 and July 2019 were reviewed, and 84 patients with a mean age of 57 (range: 40-75) years and follow-up duration of 3.9 (2-6) years were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, reparable RC tear, primary arthroscopic RC repair, no labral or bony Bankart lesion repair, and at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients less than 40 years of age were excluded. Shoulder instability recurrences and surgical reinterventions were reviewed with medical records. Statistical analysis was performed for qualitative variables using the Chi-squared test. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There was one patient with a redislocation episode (1.2%) at 2.5 years after surgery, who was surgically treated. Age, subscapular tears, bony Bankart injuries, humeral defects, and associated neurological injuries were not risk factors for recurrence in this study. Ten patients (11.9%) required reintervention. Nine patients (10.7%) re-tore their RCs. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent glenohumeral instability in active patients over 40 years with isolated RC repair after traumatic shoulder dislocation was infrequent, despite the incidence of significant Hill-Sachs defects, anterior glenoid defects, bipolar bone defects, size of the RC injury, and tendon re-tears. The incidence of re-interventions was 11.9%, with symptomatic RC retear as the main cause.
Assuntos
Instabilidade Articular , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Luxação do Ombro , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Luxação do Ombro/cirurgia , Luxação do Ombro/complicações , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/complicações , Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimal postoperative distalization (DSA) and lateralization (LSA) shoulder angles have been described as radiological measurements correlated with function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The proposed optimal values are DSA between 40° and 65° and LSA between 75° and 95°; however, whether these values can be reached with different implant designs is unclear. AIM: To determine which RSA implant could achieve higher rates of optimal DSA and LSA, to determine any association between each implant and optimal DSA and LSA, and to assess the correlation of the preoperative critical shoulder angle (CSA) and acromial index (AI) with the DSA and LSA. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study of all patients who underwent primary RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy. Three RSA implant designs were included, based on which patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (FH Arrow™; 16 patients) comprised onlay implants with a 135° neck-shaft angle (NSA); group 2 (Biomet Comprehensive™; 20 patients) comprised onlay implants with a 147° NSA; group 3 (Mathys Affinis™; 15 patients) comprised inlay implants with a 155° NSA. The AI and CSA were measured on preoperative radiographs. The DSA and LSA were measured on true AP postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: The mean DSAs were 44°, 46°, and 46° (P = 0.671) and the mean LSAs were 92°, 91°, and 82° for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.003). Group 3 had lower LSA than groups 1 (-10°; P = 0.005) and 2 (-9°; P = 0.002). Optimal DSA and LSA were achieved in 71% and 73% of all arthroplasties, respectively. No association between implant designs and achieving an optimal DSA or LSA was observed. None of the implant designs had DSA >65°. The most common cause of failure to reach an optimal LSA in onlay implants was a combination of LSA >95° and DSA <40°. The most common cause of failure in group 3 was DSA <40°. The DSA was negatively correlated with the AI (-0.384; P = 0.006) and CSA (-0.305; P = 0.033). No correlation was observed between the LSA and AI (P = 0.312) or CSA (P = 0.137). CONCLUSION: The LSA is lower with the Mathys Affinis™ implant than with the Biomet Comprehensive™ and FH Arrow™ implants; however, most LSAs are in the optimal ranges, and no association is observed between different implant designs and optimal DSA and LSA. Implant design, CSA, and AI should be considered during preoperative planning to achieve optimal DSA and LSA.