RESUMO
The median lingual foramen (MLF), which contains neurovascular bundles, is located in an area commonly considered safe for surgical procedures. However, published reports of severe complications after interventions in the mandibular symphysis area indicate the need for caution when approaching this region surgically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vertical location of the MLF and the median lingual canal (MLC) by measuring the distances of these landmarks to the root apex of the lower central incisors (LCI) and to the menton cephalometric point (Me) on pre-orthognathic surgery cone beam computed tomography scans (N = 100). The results were analyzed in relation to the patients' type of deformity, age, sex, and number of foramina (single vs multiple). The median MLF-LCI and MLF-Me distances were 5.9 mm and 15.0 mm, respectively, while the mean MLC-LCI and MLC-Me distances were 9.7 mm and 11.6 mm, respectively. The mean LCI-Me distance was 21.3 mm, while the mean MLC length was 3.4 mm. Apart from the length of the MLC, the distances were all significantly greater in the male patients than in the female patients. The MLC-Me distance and MLC length differed significantly according to the number of foramina. In preoperative planning, the vertical locations of the MLF and respective MLC appear to be relevant for avoiding neurovascular complications.
Assuntos
Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Cefalometria , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Adolescente , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Mandíbula/anatomia & histologia , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagem , Incisivo/anatomia & histologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodosRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of time, and experience, on the accuracy of maxillary repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery performed using virtual surgical planning (VSP). Patients who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery were reviewed. Maxillary position on pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans was compared. The patients were divided into groups according to the year in which VSP was performed and surgery completed. Linear distances between upper jaw reference landmarks were measured in all three planes of space to determine accuracy between the preoperative VSP and the surgical outcome at various time points. One hundred subjects met the eligibility criteria for assessment and were allocated to groups: 2013 (n=10), 2014 (n=17), 2015 (n=39), 2016 (n=20), and 2017 (n=14). Overall, the results demonstrated improved precision in maxillary position over the years, with more accurate results in patients who underwent surgery in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Mean linear differences between planned and obtained results demonstrated more accurate results in the horizontal direction, followed by transverse and vertical directions. An overall average difference within 1mm was observed for 51.3% of the measurements included in the sample group. Time, and surgeon experience, can influence the accuracy of maxillary positioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.