RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates and characteristics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in children who are not obese to prevent missed diagnoses and subsequent complications. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective review identified all patients with SCFE from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2012. Patients were excluded if they received previous surgery at an outside institution, had no recorded height and weight, or had medical co-morbidity associated with increased risk of SCFE. Body mass index (BMI) percentile for age was calculated and categorized for each patient (patients without obesity vs with obesity). RESULTS: In total, 275 patients met inclusion criteria. Average BMI was 91.2 percentile (range: 8.4-99.7). Thirteen percent (34 patients) were considered "normal weight" (BMI 5%-85%), 17% (48 patients) were considered "overweight" (BMI 85%- 95%), and 70% (193 patients) were considered "obese" (BMI >95%). Average BMI percentile was higher in male than female patients (93.2 ± 12.7 vs 88.5 ± 21.4, P = .034). Patients without obesity were older compared with patients with obesity (12.2 ± 1.7 vs 11.7 ± 1.6 years, P = .015). Fewer patients without obesity were seen at the hospital in the southwest. The southwest had fewer patients without obesity than the northeast (18.3% vs 36.1%, P = .002). Patients without obesity were more likely to present with a severe slip as graded by Wilson percent displacement (27.2% vs 11.4%, P = .007) and an unstable slip (32.9% vs 14.7%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Rates of nonobese SCFE in this study are higher than reported in the previous literature. Normal weight patients with SCFE are more likely to be older, female, and present with a severe and unstable SCFE.
Assuntos
Obesidade Infantil/complicações , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Sobrepeso/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/complicações , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The etiology of hip instability in Down syndrome is not completely understood. We investigated the morphology of the acetabulum and femur in patients with Down syndrome and compared measurements of the hips with those of matched controls. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of the pelvis of 42 patients with Down syndrome and hip symptoms were compared with those of 42 age and sex-matched subjects without Down syndrome or history of hip disease who had undergone CT for abdominal pain. Each of the cohorts had 23 male and 19 female subjects. The mean age (and standard deviation) in each cohort was 11.3 ± 5.3 years. The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular inclination angle (IA), acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR), acetabular version, and anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles (AASA and PASA) were compared. The neck-shaft angle and femoral version were measured in the patients with Down syndrome only. The hips of the patients with Down syndrome were further categorized as stable (n = 21) or unstable (n = 63) for secondary analysis. RESULTS: The hips in the Down syndrome group had a smaller LCEA (mean, 10.8° ± 12.6° compared with 25.6° ± 4.6°; p < 0.0001), a larger IA (mean, 17.4° ± 10.3° compared with 10.9° ± 4.8°; p < 0.0001), a lower ADR (mean, 231.9 ± 56.2 compared with 306.8 ± 31.0; p < 0.0001), a more retroverted acetabulum (mean acetabular version as measured at the level of the centers of the femoral heads [AVC], 7.8° ± 5.1° compared with 14.0° ± 4.5°; p < 0.0001), a smaller AASA (mean, 55.0° ± 9.9° compared with 59.7° ± 7.8°; p = 0.005), and a smaller PASA (mean, 67.1° ± 10.4° compared with 85.2° ± 6.8°; p < 0.0001). Within the Down syndrome cohort, the unstable hips showed greater femoral anteversion (mean, 32.7° ± 14.6° compared with 23.6° ± 10.6°; p = 0.002) and worse global acetabular insufficiency compared with the stable hips. No differences between the unstable and stable hips were found with respect to acetabular version (mean AVC, 7.8° ± 5.5° compared with 7.6° ± 3.8°; p = 0.93) and the neck-shaft angle (mean, 133.7° ± 6.7° compared with 133.2° ± 6.4°; p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Down syndrome and hip-related symptoms had more retroverted and shallower acetabula with globally reduced coverage of the femoral head compared with age and sex-matched subjects. Hip instability among those with Down syndrome was associated with worse global acetabular insufficiency and increased femoral anteversion, but not with more severe acetabular retroversion. No difference in the mean femoral neck-shaft angle was observed between the stable and unstable hips in the Down syndrome cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Acetábulo/patologia , Síndrome de Down/complicações , Cabeça do Fêmur/patologia , Articulação do Quadril/patologia , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anteversão Óssea/diagnóstico por imagem , Anteversão Óssea/etiologia , Anteversão Óssea/patologia , Anteversão Óssea/fisiopatologia , Retroversão Óssea/diagnóstico por imagem , Retroversão Óssea/etiologia , Retroversão Óssea/patologia , Retroversão Óssea/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Síndrome de Down/patologia , Síndrome de Down/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Cabeça do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Instabilidade Articular/patologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the time from symptom onset to diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has improved over a recent decade compared with reports of previous decades. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 481 patients admitted with a diagnosis of SCFE at three large pediatric hospitals between January 2003 and December 2012. RESULTS: The average time from symptom onset to diagnosis of SCFE was 17 weeks (range, 0-to 169). There were no significant differences in time from symptom onset to diagnosis across 2-year intervals of the 10-year study period (P = .94). The time from evaluation by first provider to diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients evaluated at an orthopedic clinic (mean, 0 weeks; range, 0-0 weeks) compared with patients evaluated by a primary care provider (mean, 4 weeks; range, 0-52 weeks; r = 0.24; P = .003) or at an emergency department (mean, 6 weeks, range, 0-104 weeks; r = 0.36; P = .008). Fifty-two patients (10.8%) developed a second SCFE after treatment of the first affected side. The time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis for the second episode of SCFE was significantly shorter (r = 0.19; P < .001), with mean interval of 11 weeks (range, 0-104 weeks) from symptom onset to diagnosis. There were significantly more cases of mildly severe SCFE, as defined by the Wilson classification scheme, in second episodes of SCFE compared with first episodes of SCFE (OR, 4.44; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Despite reports documenting a lag in time to the diagnosis of SCFE more than a decade ago, there has been no improvement in the speed of diagnosis. Decreases in both the time to diagnosis and the severity of findings for the second episode of SCFE suggest that the education of at-risk children and their families (or providers) may be of benefit in decreasing this delay.