RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC) is a chronic infection affecting 8-10% of women worldwide. Biofilm production of the infecting species and reduced sensitivity to antimycotics could contribute to the recurrence of this infection. This study aimed to examine the biofilm production ability and antifungal susceptibility of genital yeast isolates to determine their virulence potential. METHODS: Matrix-assisted laser desorption in ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was used to identify 300 Candida species. Using crystal violet method, strains were categorized into non-producers, weak, moderate, and strong biofilm producers (BFP). Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using commercial Integral System YEASTS Plus test (ISYPT) and broth microdilution method (BMM). RESULTS: MALDI-TOF MS identified 150 Candida albicans, 124 non-albicans Candida (NAC), and 26 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Within 138 (46.0%) BFP, 23 (16.7%) were strong, 44 (31.9%) moderate, and 71 (51.4%) weak. BMM was done for 43 BFP selected isolates with nystatin MIC Ë1.25 µl, fluconazole MIC Ë64 µl, and clotrimazole MIC Ë1.0 µl determined by ISYPT. Compared to all examined isolates, BMM confirmed that: i) C. albicans and NAC BFP showed low sensitivity to fluconazole (12% and 4%, respectively); ii) all BFP showed low sensitivity to nystatin (12.7% C. albicans, 14.5% NAC, and 23.1% S. cerevisiae); iii) clotrimazole in vitro was the most efficient regarding C. albicans and S. cerevisiae strains, but in 4.0% NAC BFP for this antimycotic higher MIC was established. CONCLUSION: Novel antimycotics or possible combinations of antifungal agents and natural products could be a new treatment option for RVVC.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Onychomycosis is a chronic fungal infection with increasing incidence and the global prevalence is estimated to be 5.5%. The aim of our study was to perceive objectively severity of onychomycosis by calculating Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis and to correlate this index with accurate laboratory diagnosis in our patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised of 417 patients with laboratory confirmed onychomycosis. For each patient, we recorded basic demographic information, site of infection, the most affected nail with onychomycosis, clinical presentation, and type of onychomycosis. The evaluation of the disease severity was based on Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis which was calculated for every patient separately. Mycological identification was done by microscopy and fungal culture. RESULTS: The majority of patients had distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (95.44%) that was localized on big toe (62.59%), with female to male ratio 1.24:1. Male patients had significantly more nails affected with onychomycosis compared with female patients (p = 0.011), while female had significantly more often onychomycosis on fingernails 2-5 (p < 0.05), and they reported significantly more often pain (p < 0.05) and esthetic problems (p < 0.05). Mean Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis was 16.76. Dermatophytes were most frequently isolated (91.85%). In patients with onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes, Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis had significantly higher values (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive understanding of disease characteristics will allow introduction of individualized treatment plan for each patient, based on proper fungal identification and standardized method of evaluating disease severity, which could help the patient achieve a complete cure.