RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimal treatment duration of altered fractionation schedules in head and neck cancer is still undefined. A retrospective study on local tumor control, survival, and complications of accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation in head and neck cancer was undertaken to investigate whether there was an advantage in further shortening overall time from 6.5 weeks. METHODS: Four hundred nineteen consecutive male patients treated with radiation alone for cure 1987-1998 were analyzed. Patients with stage I, or treated also with brachytherapy implants or chemotherapy, were excluded. Treatment with accelerated hyperfractionation was performed twice daily, at a median of 1.6 Gy/fraction, to a total median dose of 68 Gy in 39 days. The patient population was divided into two groups: those with < or =39 days overall treatment time (group A, n = 227; median, 33 days) and those with >39 days (group B, n = 192; median, 46 days). Group A received a significant median tumor dose reduction of 7% compared with group B. RESULTS: The 7-year actuarial local control (LC) rates were 59% and 48% for groups A and B, respectively (p =.02). The actuarial LC rates for T1-2 patients were 79% and 74% at 7 years for groups A and B, respectively (p = NS). Similarly, for T3-4 patients, they were 47% and 35% (p =.02), respectively. The 7-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates for groups A and B were 39% and 26% (p =.01), respectively. For stage II patients, DFS was 62% and 60% at 7 years (p = NS) for groups A and B, respectively. And similarly, for stage III-IV patients, DFS was 33% and 20% (p =.04), respectively, at 7 years. LC and DFS rates at 7 years for T4 and stage IV patients, respectively, were significantly improved in group A. Cox regression analyses for LC showed that both T stage and overall time were significant prognostic factors. Similarly, UICC clinical stage and overall time were significant prognostic factors for DFS. There was no difference in acute morbidity between the two groups: 3% of patients in both groups required tube or parenteral feeding. The 7-year actuarial probability of RTOG/EORTC grades 3-5 late effects was 15% and 13%, respectively, for each group (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study, with the limitations of a retrospective study, has shown a significant improvement in local tumor control and disease-free survival, in patients treated with shorter overall treatment times (median, 33 days) with an accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation schedule compared with those treated with a median duration of 46 days. No significant enhancement of acute reactions and late morbidity were observed with the shorter schedule.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Humanos , Tábuas de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The authors undertook a retrospective study on local tumor control, survival, and complications of conventional irradiation compared with accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation in women with selected head and neck tumor sites. METHODS: One hundred eight consecutive women who were treated with radiation alone for cure during 1974-1998 were analyzed. Patients were excluded who had T1 tumors of the vocal cord and those who were treated with brachytherapy implants. Fifty-nine patients were treated with conventional fractionation once daily (QD) during 1974-1998 with a median dose of 2.1 grays (Gy) per fraction up to a total median dose of 69 Gy in a median overall time of 54 days. Forty-nine patients were treated with accelerated hyperfractionation twice daily (BID) during 1987-1998 at a median dose of 1.6 Gy per fraction BID, with an interfraction interval of 4-6 hours, for a total median dose of 66 Gy in 35 days. Patients were not randomized into the QD group or the BID group. RESULTS: The 7-year actuarial local control (LC) rates for T1-T2 tumors in QD-treated and BID-treated patients were 79% and 87%, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). For T3-T4 tumors, the LC rates at 7 years were 59% and 56% for the QD and BID groups, respectively (P = NS). A Cox regression analysis for LC showed that the significant variables were T classification and overall time. Schedule (QD or BID), total dose, dose per fraction, and patient age were not significant variables. For the QD and BID groups, the 7-year actuarial cause specific survival rates for patients with Stage I-II disease were 100% and 65%, respectively (P = 0.004), and, for patients with Stages III-IVA,IVB disease, the rates were 39% and 56%, respectively (P = NS), respectively. Acute morbidity was higher with the BID schedule: In the BID group, 8% of patients required tube or parenteral feeding, and 0% of patients in the QD group required such feeding (P = 0.04). The 5-year actuarial probability of Grade 3-5 late effects (according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer grading system) was 4% for the BID group and 0% for the QD group (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation for women with advanced carcinoma of the head and neck does not provide significantly better local tumor control or cause specific disease free survival compared with conventional fractionation. Women with these malignancies appear to have a better prognosis compared with men.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/radioterapia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A retrospective study on local tumor control, survival, and complications of conventional irradiation vs. accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation in patients with selected head and neck cancer sites was undertaken. A total of 1,007 consecutive patients treated with radiation alone for cure from 1974-1997 were analyzed. Excluded were female patients, patients with T1 stage of the vocal cord, and patients also treated with brachytherapy implants. There were 637 patients treated with conventional fractionation once daily (QD) in 1974-1997, at a median 2.1 Gy/fraction, to a total median dose of 71.4 Gy in a median overall time of 54 days. As was common before the mid-1980s, 39% and 22% of patients had overall times exceeding 8 and 9 weeks, respectively; 370 patients were treated with accelerated hyperfractionation twice daily (BID) from 1987-1997, at a median of 1.6 Gy/fraction, with an interfraction interval of 4-6 h, to a total median dose of 68 Gy in 40 days. Both schedules were well-balanced with respect to their pretreatment characteristics. Patients were not randomized into QD or BID. The 10-year actuarial probability of local control was 37% vs. 56% for QD and BID, respectively (P < 0.001), which reflects an increase of 19% or a 51% reduction in the local failure rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that T-stage, QD or BID schedule, and overall treatment time were significant independent factors for achieving local tumor control. The 10-year actuarial probability of cause-specific disease-free survival was 25% and 30% for QD and BID, respectively (P = 0.012). Acute morbidity was slightly higher with the BID schedule: patients requiring tube or parenteral feeding were 2.4% for BID and 0.5% for QD (P = 0.01). The 10-year actuarial probability of RTOG/EORTC Grades 3-5 late effects was 13% for both QD and BID. The lack of increase in late complications was most probably due to the lower total dose and dose per fraction in the BID schedule. This study has shown that accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation using two doses of 1.6 Gy each treatment day for less than 6 weeks in advanced head and neck cancer in male patients provides significantly better local tumor control and cause-specific disease-free survival, without increased late morbidity, than conventional fractionation delivered at the previously relaxed overall times of 7 weeks, but sometimes exceeding 8 or 9 weeks. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 80-91, 2000.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Patients with head and neck cancer were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 40 mg/day prednisone (n = 32) or placebo (n = 34). The prescribed daily tumour dose was 1.6 Gy twice daily with an interfraction interval of > or =6 h. Treatment interruptions were at the discretion of the radiation oncologists. The primary study end-point was the total duration of treatment. A mean 4.4 day reduction was observed in the total elapsed treatment duration for the prednisone arm, 34.3 versus 29.9 days (P = 0.013), which paralleled a significantly lower median total tumour and biologically effective dose (BED) Gy10 in this arm. A trend favouring shorter treatment interruptions in the prednisone arm was also found, but not a reduction in the intensity or duration of mucositis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Mucosa/efeitos da radiação , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study assessed the effectiveness and toxicity of induction chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix with data provided by a pilot study and a randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-six patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IB-IVA (Stage IB >4-cm tumor diameter) (Group A) were entered in a pilot study and treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m2), vincristine (1 mg/m2 on days 1, 11, and 21), bleomycin (25 mg/m2 infusion on days 1-3, 11-13, and 21-23), and standard RT. Ninety-six patients were randomized to either this same CT regimen and RT, or RT alone (Group B: CT plus RT or RT). RESULTS: In Group A, 58% responded to induction CT. With a mean follow-up of 78 months, 73% achieved pelvic control (LRC), and 55% were disease-free survivors. Response to CT was not a marker for ultimate LRC or increased disease-free survival (DFS). In Group B, 62% responded to CT. With a mean follow-up of 43 months, LRC was 68% and 65% for all randomized patients in the CT plus RT and RT arms, respectively (p = NS). In patients who completed treatment, 78% and 70%, respectively, achieved LRC (p = NS). Disease-free survival rates were 38% and 49% for randomized patients in the CT plus RT and RT arms (p = NS), respectively, and 44% and 52% in those patients completing treatment (p = NS), respectively. Complications were acceptable. CONCLUSION: Data from this study did not prove the efficacy of induction CT before definitive RT in locally advanced cancer of the cervix. Induction CT with the currently used combinations and modes of administration should not be considered standard therapy.