RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To report four cases with interesting anatomical presentations of multilayer macular hemorrhages with preretinal hemorrhage possibly preventing subretinal involvement of the macular area. CASES PRESENTATION: Observational study of four patients presenting with macular hemorrhages. RESULTS: Four patients with multilayer macular hemorrhage due to different causes, presented with a halo-shaped submacular hemorrhage coincident with the preretinal hemorrhage borders. After resolution, in all cases, the macular area underneath the preretinal hemorrhage was found to be spared. CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that an extensive preretinal hemorrhage can exert a mechanical force pushing the subretinal hemorrhage towards the periphery, consequently protecting the macular area.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of photoreceptor density assessment with manual cell counting in healthy participants imaged with the Heidelberg Spectralis High Magnification Module (HMM). DESIGN: Precision study, evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven eyes of 8 participants. METHODS: Images were acquired using the Spectralis HMM by a single operator during 2 separate imaging sessions. The 3 highest-quality images of each eye from each session were selected for analysis and coregistered. For a subset of participants, a second operator acquired images in 1 session, and images with the best quality were selected for analysis. Photoreceptor densities were obtained by manual counts in squares of 0.0625 mm2 located in the parafovea. Repeatability (intragrader and intrasession) and reproducibility (interoperator, intergrader, and intersession) were assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from linear mixed effects models. Bland-Altman plots, coefficients of repeatability, and Pearson correlation results were reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intragrader, intrasession, intersession, interoperator, and intergrader ICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals for photoreceptor density measurements in the parafovea. RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 13 healthy participants were imaged initially. Of these, 11 eyes (45.83%) of 8 participants that had at least 3 acceptable images in each session were included in this study. Mean parafoveal photoreceptor density was 14 988 cells/mm2 (standard deviation, 1403.15 cells/mm2). Intragrader ICC was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.95), intrasession ICC was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.86), intersession ICC was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.96), interoperator ICC was 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0-0.95), and intergrader ICC was 0.22 (95% confidence interval, 0-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Images obtained with the HMM allow for photoreceptor mosaic visualization in the macular area, mainly in the parafovea. Although densities obtained are in accordance with other reported methods in the literature, variability within and between images of the apparent cell mosaic were observed, and this study did not demonstrate high repeatability or reproducibility for quantitative assessments using the manual counting method.