RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients with diabetic macular edema can develop fundus autofluorescence alterations; thus far, these alterations have been more widely studied with scanning or confocal laser systems. OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify fundus autofluorescence abnormal patterns in patients with diabetic macular edema using the fundus autofluorescence system with a flash camera. METHOD: Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. Fundus autofluorescence digital images of non-comparative cases with untreated diabetic macular edema, obtained and stored with a flash camera system, were assessed. Inter-observer variability was evaluated. RESULTS: 37 eyes of 20 patients were included. Lens opacity was the most common cause of inadequate image quality. Five different fundus autofluorescence patterns were observed: decreased (13%), normal (40%), focal hyper-autofluorescent (17%), multi-focal hyper-autofluorescent (22%) and plaque-like hyper-autofluorescent (8%). The kappa coefficient was 0.906 (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Different fundus autofluorescence phenotypic patterns are observed with flash camera systems in patients with diabetic macular edema. A more accurate phenotypic classification could help establish prognostic factors for visual loss or for the design of clinical trials for diabetic macular edema.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Los pacientes con edema macular diabético pueden presentar alteraciones en la autofluorescencia retiniana, que hasta el momento han sido analizadas más con sistemas de láser de barrido o confocales. OBJETIVO: Describir y clasificar los patrones anormales de autofluorescencia retiniana en pacientes con edema macular diabético mediante el sistema de autofluorescencia retiniana con cámara de flash. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, transversal y descriptivo. Se evaluaron imágenes digitales de autofluorescencia retiniana de casos no comparativos con edema macular diabético no tratado, obtenidas y almacenadas con el sistema de cámara de flash.Se evaluó la variabilidad interobservador. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 37 ojos de 20 pacientes. La opacidad de medios fue la causa más común de calidad inadecuada de imagen. Se observaron cinco diferentes patrones de autofluorescencia retiniana: disminuida (13 %), normal (40 %), hiperautofluorescente unifocal (17 %), hiperautofluorescente multifocal (22 %) e hiperautofluorescente en placa (8 %). El coeficiente kappa fue de 0.906 (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con edema macular diabético se presentan diferentes patrones fenotípicos de autofluorescencia retiniana con los sistemas de cámara de flash. Una clasificación fenotípica más precisa pudiera ayudar a establecer factores pronósticos de pérdida visual o al diseño de ensayos clínicos relativos a edema macular diabético.
Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema Macular/diagnóstico por imagem , Imagem Óptica/instrumentação , Catarata , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Imagem Óptica/classificação , Imagem Óptica/métodos , Fenótipo , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients with diabetic macular edema can develop fundus autofluorescence alterations; thus far, these alterations have been more widely studied with scanning or confocal laser systems. OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify fundus autofluorescence abnormal patterns in patients with diabetic macular edema using the fundus autofluorescence system with a flash camera. METHOD: Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. Fundus autofluorescence digital images of non-comparative cases with untreated diabetic macular edema, obtained and stored with a flash camera system, were assessed. Inter-observer variability was evaluated. RESULTS: 37 eyes of 20 patients were included. Lens opacity was the most common cause of inadequate image quality. Five different fundus autofluorescence patterns were observed: decreased (13%), normal (40%), single-spot hyper-autofluorescent (17 %), multiple-spot hyper-autofluorescent (22 %) and plaque-like hyper-autofluorescent (8 %). The kappa coefficient was 0.906 (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Different fundus autofluorescence phenotypic patterns are observed with flash camera systems in patients with diabetic macular edema. A more accurate phenotypic classification could help establish prognostic factors for visual loss or for the design of clinical trials for diabetic macular edema.