RESUMO
TITLE: Sindrome de vasoconstriccion cerebral reversible secundario a un paraganglioma yugular secretor de metanefrinas.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/etiologia , Cefaleia/etiologia , Veias Jugulares , Paraganglioma/complicações , Neoplasias Vasculares/complicações , Vasoconstrição , Secreções Corporais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paraganglioma/metabolismo , Síndrome , Neoplasias Vasculares/metabolismoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a low incidence disability with a multifactorial etiology and a wide array of symptoms. The main symptom is a thunderclap headache, accompanied sometimes with various neurological deficits that can lead to death. RCVS is usually diagnosed through radiological imaging technology. The treatment includes adopting general measures of monitoring, symptomatic management, identifying the etiology and acting on it to avoid recurrence. CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer originally treated with tamoxifen. Due to urticaria, the anastrozole management was staggered. She was admitted for aphasia, drowsiness and a thunderclap headache. The patient reported a similar event two weeks prior admission. In brain resonance, there was evidence of small sub-arachnoidal haemorrhage (SAH) of the left parietal temporal convexity and cerebral angiography. As well as documented vasospasm in the posterior parietal region confirming the diagnosis of RCVS plus SAH. During the stay, she presented three events with the same characteristics, requiring intensive monitoring and two therapeutic panangiographies with intra-arterial nimodipine with subsequent resolution of the vessel spasm. The patient remains asymptomatic six months later. CONCLUSION: RCVS is difficult to diagnose given its wide array of symptoms and multifactorial etiology. In this case, RCVS plus SAH is associated with the use of anastrozole. So far there are no reported cases of aromatase inhibitors associated with this pathology and should be reported in the literature for pharmacovigilance.
TITLE: Sindrome de vasoconstriccion cerebral reversible asociado a anastrozol: una causa inusual de alto impacto.Introduccion. El sindrome de vasoconstriccion cerebral reversible (SVCR) es una entidad de baja incidencia, de etiologia multifactorial y amplio espectro de presentacion. El principal sintoma es la cefalea de tipo trueno. Puede estar acompañado de focalizacion neurologica y cursar con desenlaces clinicos variable que incluso pueden llevar a la muerte. El diagnostico es clinico e imaginologico, y el tratamiento incluye adoptar medidas generales de monitorizacion, manejo sintomatico, identificar la etiologia y actuar sobre ella para evitar recurrencia. Caso clinico. Mujer de 71 años con antecedente de cancer de seno, tratada inicialmente con tamoxifeno; por presentar urticaria, se escalono tratamiento con anastrozol. Ingreso por cefalea de tipo trueno, afasia anterior y somnolencia. La paciente refirio un evento similar una semana antes del ingreso. En la resonancia magnetica cerebral evidencio una hemorragia subaracnoidea (HSA) pequeña de la convexidad temporoparietal izquierda, y la panangiografia documento vasoespasmo en la region parietal posterior, lo que confirmo el diagnostico de SVCR mas HSA. Durante el ingreso presento tres eventos de iguales caracteristicas, que requirieron monitorizacion intensiva y dos panangiografias terapeuticas con nimodipino intraarterial, con posterior resolucion del vasoespasmo. Permanece asintomatica seis meses despues. Conclusion. El SVCR constituye un reto diagnostico dada su presentacion variable y su etiologia multifactorial. En este caso, el SVCR mas HSA esta asociado al uso de anastrozol. Hasta el momento no hay casos descritos de inhibidores de la aromatasa asociados a esta patologia, que debe comunicarse para su farmacovigilancia.
Assuntos
Anastrozol/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome , VasoconstriçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have a poor prognosis, with survival ranging from 25 to 40 weeks. Antiangiogenic agents are widely used, showing a variable response. In this study, we explored the efficacy of carmustine plus bevacizumab (BCNU/Bev) for treating rGBM. METHODS/PATIENTS: In this study, we assessed 59 adult patients with histologically confirmed rGBM who were treated with BCNU/Bev as second-line regimen. The response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to their molecular expression profile, including CD133 mRNA expression, MGMT methylation (pMGMT), PDGFR amplification, YKL40 mRNA expression, IDH1/2 condition, p53 and EGFRvIII mutation status. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18.6 months, overall RR to the combination was 56.3%, and median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI 8.0-9.9). OS from time of diagnosis was 21.0 months (95% CI 13.2-28.7) and from starting BCNU/Bev it was 10.7 months (95% CI 9.5-11.8). IDH1/2 mutations were found in 30.5% of the patients, pMGMT in 55.9% and high CD133 mRNA expression in 57.6%. Factors which positively affected PFS included performance status (p = 0.015), IDH+ (p = 0.05), CD133 mRNA expression (p = 0.009) and pMGMT+ (p = 0.007). OS was positively affected by pMGMT+ (p = 0.05). Meanwhile, YKL40 negatively affected PFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.0001). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities included hypertension (22%) and fatigue (12%). CONCLUSIONS: BCNU/Bev is a safe and tolerable treatment for rGBM. Patients with MGMT+/IDH+ derive the greatest benefit from the treatment combination in the second-line setting. Nonetheless, high YKL40 expression discourages the use of antiangiogenic therapy.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno AC133/genética , Antígeno AC133/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Carmustina/efeitos adversos , Proteína 1 Semelhante à Quitinase-3/genética , Colômbia , Metilases de Modificação do DNA/metabolismo , Enzimas Reparadoras do DNA/metabolismo , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Genes erbB-1 , Genes p53 , Glioblastoma/irrigação sanguínea , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Isocitrato Desidrogenase/genética , Masculino , Metilação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/irrigação sanguínea , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Receptores do Fator de Crescimento Derivado de Plaquetas/genética , Análise de Sobrevida , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/metabolismo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The high prevalence of heart failure has increased the candidate list for heart transplantation; however, there is a shortage of viable donated organs, which is responsible for the high mortality of patients awaiting a transplantation. Because the marginal donor presents additional risk factors, it is not considered to be an ideal donor. The use of a marginal donor is only justified in situations when the risk of patient death due to heart disease is greater than that offered by the donor. These recommendations sought to expand the supply of donors, consequently increasing the transplant rate. We selected articles based on robust evidence to provide a substratum to develop recommendations for donors who exceed the traditional acceptance criteria. Recipient survival in the immediate postoperative period is intimately linked to allograft quality. Primary allograft failure is responsible for 38% to 40% of immediate deaths after heart transplantation: therefore; marginal donor selection must be more rigorous to not increase the surgical risk. The main donor risk factors with the respective evidence levels are: cancer in the donor (B), female donor (B), donor death due to hemorrhagic stroke (B), donor age above 50 years (relative risk [RR] = 1.5) (B), weight mismatch between donor and recipient < 0.8 (RR = 1.3) (B), ischemia > 240 minutes (RR = 1.2) (B), left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction below 45% (B), and use of high doses of vasoactive drugs (dopamine > 15 mg/kg·min) (B). Factors that impact recipient mortality are: age over 50 years (RR = 1.5); allograft harvest at a distance; adult recipient weighing more than 20% of the donor; high doses of vasoactive drugs (dopamine greater than 15 mg/kg·min) and ischemic time >4 hours. The use of a marginal donor is only justified when it is able to increase life expectancy compared with clinical treatment, albeit the outcomes are interior to those using an ideal donor.