RESUMO
Ankyloglossia may prevent the tongue from contacting the anterior palate, which promotes an infantile swallow and hamper the progression to an adult-like swallow. This can result in an open bite deformity and in some cases it can be associated to mandibular prognathism and language problems like rhotacism, described as the inability or difficulty in pronouncing the sound / r /. The surgical cut of the frenum tissue that connects the tongue to the jawbone (frenulectomy) and the language rehabilitation treatment with functional oral devices, represent an alternative treatment for this problem. An 11-year-old boy reported with language performance problems, dental malposition and diagnostic of ankyloglossia condition, received frenulectomy surgery and language rehabilitation treatment with functional oral devices during six months. Language diagnosis was carried out in three periods of time: prior to the surgery, four weeks after the surgery and six months later. Combined surgical and functional therapies proved to be a better alternative than only surgical therapy. Combined therapies increased the speech abilities as well as swallowing functions, therefore, the patient's self-esteem.
La anquiloglosia puede evitar que la lengua entre en contacto con la región anterior del paladar, lo que promueve una deglución infantil y dificultan la adecuada deglusión en el adulto. Esto también puede dar lugar a una mordida abierta y en algunos casos, estar asociada con prognatismo mandibular y problemas de lenguaje como el rotacismo, que se describen como la incapacidad o dificultad para pronunciar el sonido / r /. La exsición quirúrgica del tejido que conecta frenillo de la lengua a la mandíbula (frenectomía) y el tratamiento rehabilitador del lenguaje con dispositivos orales funcionales, representan una alternativa de tratamiento para este problema. Un niño de 11 años de edad, con problemas de lenguaje, malposición dental y diagnóstico de anquiloglosia, fue sometido a frenectomía y tratamiento de rehabilitación dellenguaje mediante dispositivos orales funcionales durante seis meses. El diagnóstico del lenguaje se llevó a cabo en tres periodos de tiempo: antes de la cirugía, cuatro semanas después de la cirugía y seis meses más tarde. La combinación de tratamiento quirúrgico y funcionales demostraron ser una alternativa mejor que la terapia quirúrgica por sí sola. Las terapias combinadas aumentaron la capacidad del habla, así como funciones de deglución, por lo tanto, la autoestima del paciente.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Anormalidades da Boca/terapia , Doenças da Língua/terapia , Freio Lingual/anormalidades , Transtornos da Articulação/etiologia , Anormalidades da Boca/complicações , Doenças da Língua/complicações , Estimulação Física/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/métodos , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtornos da Articulação/terapia , VibraçãoRESUMO
A total of 32,022 Mexican children (16,473 boys, 15,549 girls) were examined for several congenital oral and paraoral anomalies. The findings for commissural lip pits (boys 53.1, girls 52.4 per 1000) are less than those reported for adults. This may indicate that pits become accentuated with age. Fordyce granules were seen with a prevalence of 1.2 per 1000. This is in contrast to the reported 85.6% prevalence for the adult population, also possibly reflecting increased manifestation with increased age. Our data for exogenous tooth pigmentation show increased prevalence with age (group I [5 to 10 1/2 years], 9.8%, versus group II [10 1/2 to 14 1/2 years], 12.9%), possibly indicating decrease in attention to oral hygiene. The prevalence of talon cusp was found to be 0.6 per 1000, and for ankyloglossia 8.3 per 1000. Prevalence values for bifid tongue are reported for the first time, indicating one affected per 187 children examined. The prevalence of fissured tongue (15.7%) shows a statistically significant difference between boys (16.8%) and girls (14.5%). The prevalence of geographic tongue (1.9%) shows a marked difference between group I (2.2%) and group II (1.2%).