RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To decrease the percentage of patients undergoing an abdominal radiograph for evaluation of constipation within 24 hours of their initial gastroenterology visit. STUDY DESIGN: In January 2015, we implemented a quality improvement, evidence-based guideline (EBG) aimed at standardizing the initial assessment of patients presenting for a new outpatient gastroenterology visit with a primary complaint of constipation. Over the subsequent 5 years, we followed the clinical impact of this guideline initiation with the goal of decreasing unnecessary abdominal radiograph use by 10% within 1 year of EBG launch. Patients older than 6 months and younger than 19 years were included. RESULTS: In total, 6723 patients completed new patient gastroenterology visits for a primary diagnosis of constipation between 2013 and 2019. Of these, 993 (14.8%) patients had abdominal radiographs taken within 24 hours of their initial visit. Over the 7 years of this project, a mean frequency of abdominal radiograph use decreased from 24% to less than 11%. In addition, a 57% decrease in hospital charges related to decreased radiograph use for constipation was found. No increases in subsequent emergency department visits or hospitalization for constipation within 30 days of patients' initial visits were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Through local adoption of an EBG, routine use of abdominal radiographs taken during a patient's initial outpatient gastroenterology visit for constipation decreased by more than 50%. This reduction was maintained over a subsequent 5-year period without any detrimental side effects.
Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal , Melhoria de Qualidade , Criança , Humanos , Raios X , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Abdominal , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of hospitalization rates between patients with aspiration treated with gastrostomy vs those fed oral thickened liquids. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of patients with an abnormal videofluoroscopic swallow study between February 2006 and August 2013; 114 patients at Boston Children's Hospital were included. Frequency, length, and type of hospitalizations within 1 year of abnormal swallow study or gastrostomy tube (g-tube) placement were analyzed using a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS: Patients fed by g-tube had a median of 2 (IQR 1, 3) admissions per year compared with patients fed orally who had a 1 (IQR 0, 1) admissions per year, P < .0001. Patients fed by gastrostomy were hospitalized for more days (median 24 [IQR 6, 53] days) vs patients fed orally (median 2 [IQR 1, 4] days, [P < .001]). Despite the potential risk of feeding patients orally, no differences in total pulmonary admissions (incidence rate ratio 1.65; 95% CI [0.70, 3.84]) between the 2 groups were found, except patients fed by g-tube had 2.58 times (95% CI [1.02, 6.49]) more urgent pulmonary admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent g-tube placement for the treatment of aspiration had 2 times as many admissions compared with patients with aspiration who were fed orally. We recommend a trial of oral feeding in all children cleared to take nectar or honey thickened liquids prior to g-tube placement.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Gastrostomia/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Aspiração Respiratória/terapia , Boston , Pré-Escolar , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube complications in a large cohort of infants and children. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a chart review of 591 pediatric patients undergoing PEG tube placement between 2006 and 2010 at Boston Children's Hospital. Frequency and type of major and minor complications associated with PEG tubes in children were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then conducted to determine potential risk factors for complications. RESULTS: A total of 198 PEG-related complications (72 major and 126 minor) were noted in our cohort of 591 patients. Approximately 10.5% of patients experienced at least one major complication and 16.4% experienced at least one minor complication, with the great majority of complications occurring after discharge postplacement. Age <6 months (P = .003), American Society of Anesthesiologists class III (P = .02), and presence of a neurologic disorder (P = .05) were found to be protective against experiencing a major complication, whereas the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was confirmed to be a risk factor (P = .01) for major complications. CONCLUSION: Both minor and major complications are common in children after PEG tube placement, with most complications occurring several months postoperatively. Certain patient factors, including age, neurologic status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class, may be protective, and the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be associate with an increased risk of complications after PEG tube placement.