RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Web-based physical therapy (WBPT) is a potential means to reduce costs following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although outcomes data support the use of self-directed therapy after TKA, there is a paucity of literature evaluating its cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to determine utilization trends of either outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) or WBPT after TKA, assess the outcomes of patients based on their use of WBPT, OPPT, or both, and evaluate OPPT costs based on the amount of WBPT used. METHODS: A retrospective review of 701 patients (731 TKAs) was performed. Patients were given a prescription for OPPT and access to a self-directed WBPT program. Functional scores were obtained preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively, and the rate of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), range of motion, and PT costs were recorded. RESULTS: About 49.8% of patients utilized WBPT, 34.7% of patients utilized WBPT and OPPT, and 23% of patients utilized neither source of therapy. Patients that utilized both WBPT and OPPT demonstrated the lowest rates of MUA. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes based on the number of WBPT logins. Overall, PT cost was 3.4× higher for those that underwent MUA. Subgroup analysis of patients that utilized WBPT revealed that the cost and number of PT visits decreased as the number of logins increased. Patients younger than 65 utilized more WBPT and OPPT while demonstrating worse outcomes (lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement postoperative scores and more MUAs). CONCLUSION: WBPT can be an effective option to offset costs associated with OPPT, without compromising outcomes.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Análise Custo-Benefício , Terapia por Exercício , Humanos , Internet , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Controlling postoperative pain and reducing opioid requirements after total knee arthroplasty remain a challenge, particularly in an era stressing rapid recovery protocols and early discharge. A single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) has been shown to be effective in decreasing postoperative pain. The purpose of the present study is to compare the efficacy of an anesthesiologist administered ACB and a surgeon administered intraoperative ACB. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive either an anesthesiologist administered (group 1) or surgeon administered (group 2) ACB using 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.5%. Primary outcomes were pain visual analog scale, range of motion, and opioid consumption. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized to group 1 and 29 to group 2. Opioid equivalents consumed were equal on postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, and 2. Patients in group 1 had statistically less pain on POD 0, but this did not reach clinical significance and there was no difference in pain on POD 1 or 2. Patients in group 1 had significantly increased active flexion POD 1, but there was no difference in active flexion on POD 0 or 6 weeks postop. There was no difference in patient satisfaction with pain control or short-term functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeon administered ACB is not inferior to anesthesiologist administered ACB with respect to pain, opioid consumption, range of motion, patient satisfaction, or short-term functional outcomes. Surgeon administered ACB is an effective alternative to anesthesiologist administered ACB.