RESUMO

Purpose: The indications for prophylactic antibiotics in hand surgery remain undefined. Current literature has focused solely on readmission and reoperation for surgical site infection, while neglecting minor infectious complications treated at outpatient follow-up in addition to complications from antibiotic therapy observed after surgery. This study sought to analyze major and minor infection rates, as well as adverse effects of preoperative antibiotics after clean hand surgery. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period. The cohorts included patients who received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and those that did not. Patient details and operative data were obtained during the first postoperative visit following the index surgery. Primary outcomes assessed were as follows: (1) major infection, defined as admission or reoperation for infection; (2) minor infection, defined as use of postoperative oral antibiotics; and (3) complications of antibiotic therapy. Results: A total of 377 consecutive patients underwent operations of the upper extremity. Complications from preoperative antibiotic therapy were seen in 6.9% of patients. Overall, there were no major postoperative infections and the minor postoperative infection rate was 5.6%. The minor infection rate was 6.9% (9/131) among patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics and 4.9% (12/246) among patients who received preoperative antibiotics (P = .57). Conclusions: A 5.6% minor infection rate was identified following clean hand surgery, with no cases of major infection. Preoperative antibiotics did not demonstrate benefit in terms of reduction of minor infections, but they did yield a 6.9% adverse reaction rate, including one case of Clostridium difficile infection warranting hospitalization. Caution is recommended while prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for clean hand surgeries, given the lack of clear benefits and the potential for adverse effects. Type of Study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described. METHODS: Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence. RESULTS: The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures can be treated nonsurgically or with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). It is unclear whether ORIF provides quicker and/or more predictable healing. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing characteristics of isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures after surgical and nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: All patients treated for an isolated diaphyseal (distal- or middle-third) ulna fracture between 2010 and 2018, with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up, were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record patient demographics, assess the treatments used, and compare outcomes. We determined healing and nonunion rates, complications, reoperations, and final radiographic fracture alignment. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included with a median follow-up of 20 weeks. Of these, 56 patients were treated nonsurgically and 39 patients were treated with ORIF. At the time of the final follow-up, 51 of the 56 (91.1%) nonsurgically treated fractures had healed and 38 of the 39 (97.4%) surgically managed fractures had healed. There were 5 nonunions after nonsurgical treatment (8.9%) and 1 nonunion after ORIF (2.6%). Eleven patients (19.6%) treated nonsurgically required conversion to ORIF, whereas 4 patients (10.3%) treated with ORIF required reoperation. Middle-third fractures treated nonsurgically had a higher rate of nonunion (30.8%) compared with distal-third fractures treated nonsurgically (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The healing characteristics of isolated ulnar shaft fractures do not appear to differ substantially between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. However, nearly 20% of the patients treated nonsurgically may require eventual ORIF. Distal-third fractures may be at a higher risk of conversion to ORIF, and middle-third fractures may be at a higher risk of nonunion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggested that unsupervised, self-directed physical therapy (SDPT) is both safe and efficacious for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and that formal outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) may not be routinely required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the routine use of an SDPT program in a nonselect patient population. METHODS: This is a multi-surgeon, single-institution, retrospective study of 941 consecutive patients discharged home, from January 2016 to December 2016, after primary, unilateral THA and enrolled in a web-based SDPT program. Patients were seen 4 weeks after surgery and OPPT was prescribed for perceived need, patient request, or if unable to use the web-based program. Patient-reported outcomes, medical comorbidities, and assessment of home environment were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 646 of 941 patients (68.7%) were not prescribed OPPT (SDPT-only group) while 295 of 941 patients (31.3%) were prescribed OPPT (SDPT + OPPT group). In the SDPT + OPPT group, 88.2% were for perceived need, 10.8% for patient request, and 1.0% due to inability to use the web-based platform. Multivariate analysis identified male sex (odds ratio, 0.64; 0.45-0.90; P = .012) and a higher preoperative Short Form-12 physical component (odds ratio, 0.98; 0.96-0.99; P = .036) as independent variables protective against requiring OPPT. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, the SDPT-only group had statistically higher hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score junior compared to the SDPT + OPPT cohort (85.0 vs 80.9; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Web-based SDPT is safe and effective for most, but not all, patients eligible for home discharge after THA. It is critical to preserve OPPT services for the one-third of patients who require them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, self-directed physical therapy (SDPT) programs have gained popularity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the routine use of an SDPT program in a nonselect patient population. METHODS: This is a single-surgeon, retrospective study of 296 consecutive patients from August 2016 to October 2017 discharged home after primary, unilateral TKA and enrolled in a web-based SDPT program. Patients were seen 2 weeks after surgery and outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) was prescribed if flexion was less than 90°, upon patient request, or inability to use the web-based platform. RESULTS: Overall, 195 of 296 (65.9%) patients did not require OPPT (SDPT-only) while 101 of 296 were prescribed OPPT (34.1%, SDPT + OPPT). In SDPT + OPPT, 66.3% were for flexion <90°, 27.7% by patient request, 5.0% received a prescription but did not attend OPPT, and 1.0% due to inability to use the web-based platform. The rate of manipulation under anesthesia was 2.36% overall (SDPT + OPPT, 6.93%; SDPT-only, 0.0%). Multivariate analysis identified elevated Charlson comorbidity index, elevated body mass index, higher preoperative SF12 mental score, and loss of flexion at 2 weeks as independent predictors associated with the need for OPPT. CONCLUSION: Web-based SDPT is safe and effective for most patients eligible for home discharge after TKA. It is difficult to preoperatively predict those patients who will require OPPT; therefore, we recommend close follow-up. It is critical to preserve these services for patients who require them after TKA as up to a third of patients required OPPT.

Assuntos

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to determine their relationship to other measures of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ODI is an easily scored, common, 10-item questionnaire about symptoms relevant to lumbar spine pathology. It is not clear if all of the items can be reliably applied to spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the ODI and to determine their relationship to other measures of HRQOL. METHODS: Analysis of a prospective registry of patients treated at an academic medical center was undertaken. At baseline, standardized outcome measures including ODI and SF12 PCS were collected on all patients undergoing elective fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Multiple linear regressions were performed using change in SF12 PCS as the dependent variable and change in ODI components as the independent variables. RESULTS: Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were collected on 196 patients (mean age 60.4 years). There were statistically significant differences in improvement among ODI items. Surprisingly, the most improvement after surgery was noted in the standing, sex life, and social life domains. The least improvement was noted in the personal care, sleeping, and sitting domains. Linear regression for change in ODI components versus change in SF-12 PCS revealed a significant correlation (R = 0.353, P ≤ 0.001). The only retained domains in the final model were change in lifting, standing, and traveling as predictors for ΔPCS. CONCLUSION: All domains of the ODI do not improve equally after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Some of the domains that improve most (e.g., sex life) have no discernible relationship to the known pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Based upon these results, we conclude that the item bank and composite scoring of the ODI are inappropriate for evaluating quality of life in studies of surgically treated degenerative spondylolisthesis patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Assuntos