RESUMO
The one year clinical benefit of various doses and release durations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodablepolymer has not been evaluated so far.Methods and results: Conor paclitaxel-eluting stents have intra-stent wells in which drug and polymer aredeposited. Stents with six different release formulations (dose: 10 μg or 30 μg, duration: 5, 10 or 30 days,direction: mural or bidirectional) were implanted in 6 patient cohorts. Clinical follow-up was conducted at4 and 12 months. Quantitative angiography and IVUS were performed at 4 months, and additional angiographicand IVUS follow-up were performed for groups D5 (10μg/30days/mural) and D6(30μg/30days/mural), as they had shown the most favorable results at 4 months. At one year, the lowestmajor adverse cardiac event rates were observed in the slow release (30 day) group (5.1% in D5 and 6.9%in D6). One-year in-stent late loss was 0.52±0.34 mm in D5 and 0.36±0.50mm in D6 (p=0.20) whileneointimal area was 0.99±0.54 mm2 in D5 and 0.77±0.92 mm2 in D6 (p=0.42). Corresponding in-stentbinary restenosis at one year was 0% and 5.6% respectively (p=0.36).Conclusions: Patients who received the slow release formulation stent had better clinical outcome at oneyear than those who received the fast release formulation. However, the effect on neointimal suppressionrequires investigation in a larger population to determine whether the high dose formulation confers anadditional clinical benefit.