Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(9): 2407-2413, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31303438

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical outcomes of perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhages based on the computed tomography (CT) bleeding patterns. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included: (1) patients (≥18 years) admitted to a comprehensive stroke center (January 2015-May 2018), (2) with angiography-negative, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in a perimesencephalic or diffuse bleeding pattern, and (3) had CT imaging performed in ≤ 72 hours of symptom onset. Patients were stratified by location of bleeding on CT: Peri-1: focal prepontine hemorrhage; Peri-2: prepontine with suprasellar cistern +/- intraventricular extension; and diffuse. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients included, 13 were Peri-1, 11 were Peri-2, and 15 were diffuse. The majority were male (n = 26), with a mean (standard deviation) age of 55.3 (11.3) years, who often presented with headache (n = 37) and nausea (n = 28). Overall, patients in Peri-1 were significantly less likely to have hydrocephalus compared to Peri-2 and dSAH (P= .003), and 4 patients required an external ventricular drain. Five patients developed symptomatic vasospasm. Patients in Peri-1, compared to Peri-2 and diffuse, had a significantly shorter median neuro critical care unit length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS. Most patients (n = 35) had a discharge modified Rankin Score between 0 and 2 with no significant differences found between groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients with the best clinical course were those in Peri-1, followed by Peri-2, and then diffuse. Because these patients often present with similar clinical signs, stratifying by hemorrhage pattern may help clinicians predict which patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage develop complications.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/classificação , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/terapia , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(6)2017 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28611097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cerebral venous thrombosis is a rare cause of stroke that poses diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Mainstay treatment is systemic anticoagulation, but endovascular treatment is increasingly advocated. Our objectives were to describe the epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of 152 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive cerebral venous thrombosis cases from 2006 to 2013 at a comprehensive stroke center through hospital discharge. Predictors of full recovery (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-1) were analyzed with multiple logistic regression and presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The population was young (average age: 42 years), majority female (69%), and commonly presenting with cerebral edema (63%), and 72% were transferred in. All patients received systemic anticoagulation; 49% (n=73) required endovascular treatment. Reasons for requiring endovascular treatment included cerebral edema, herniation, or hemorrhagic infarct (n=38); neurologic decline (n=17); rethrombosis, persistent occlusion, or clot propagation (n=10); extensive clot burden (n=7); and persistent headache despite anticoagulation (n=1). There were 7 (10%) procedural complications. Recanalization was successful (61%), partial (30%), and unsuccessful (9%). Overall, 60% fully recovered. Positive predictors of full recovery included hormonal etiology, particularly for patients who were transferred in (AOR: 7.06 [95% CI, 2.27-21.96], interaction P=0.03) and who had migraine history (AOR: 4.87 [95% CI, 1.01-23.50], P=0.05), whereas negative predictors of full recovery were cerebral edema (AOR: 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04-0.34], P<0.001) and motor weakness (AOR: 0.28 [95% CI, 0.09-0.96], P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: As one of the largest cohort studies, our findings suggest that cerebral edema, history of migraine, and hormonal etiology were prognostic and that endovascular treatment might be a safe and effective treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis when conventional management is inadequate.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Trombose Intracraniana/epidemiologia , Trombectomia/métodos , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Angiografia Cerebral , Colorado/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Trombose Intracraniana/diagnóstico , Trombose Intracraniana/cirurgia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA