RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The patency capsule is an effective diagnostic method for preventing video capsule retention in the small bowel during capsule endoscopy. The most frequently associated complication when using the patency capsule is symptomatic retention. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of patency capsules administered to patients at a tertiary care hospital center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted that included all the patients with confirmed Crohn's disease that were administered a patency capsule, within the time frame of January 2019 and December 2020. PC diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated, in relation to capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy findings. Complications associated with the patency capsule were also identified. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, in whom the patency capsule had 83% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 96% negative predictive value, with a diagnostic yield of 96.7%. There was one complication (3.3%) and it resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: The patency capsule is a safe and effective method for reducing video capsule retention during capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Endoscopia por Cápsula/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background and study aims: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a safe and efficient method for diagnosis of small-bowel diseases. Since its development, different models have appeared. The aim of this study was to analyze which of the different models of SBCE has the best diagnostic yield. Patients and methods: Extensive medical literature research was reviewed, using MESH terms, searching studies comparing different SBCE types. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of all the comparisons and when there were 2 or more studies that compared the same model of SBCEs, a meta-analysis was performed. Results: Ten eligible studies including 1065 SBCEs procedures were identified. The main indication was occult gastrointestinal bleeding in 9/10 studies. Two of them included anemia, chronic diarrhea and/or chronic abdominal pain. The indication in one article was celiac disease. In 9 studies, different types of SBCEs (MiroCam, Endocapsule, OMOM and CapsoCam) were compared with PillCam (SB, SB2 and SB3). Three studies compared MiroCam vs PillCam and CapsoCam vs PillCam, while two studies contrast Endocapsule vs PillCam. None of the SBCEs show superiority over PillCam [OR 0.78 (95%CI;0.60-1.01)]. One study compared SBCEs other than Pillcam (MiroCam vs Endocapsule). Nine studies did not find statistical differences between SBCEs, one showed better diagnostic yield of Mirocam compared with PillCam SB3 (p=0.02). The difference between these SBCE was not replayed in the metaanalysis [OR 0.77 (95%CI;0.49-1.21)]. Conclusions: Despite the appearance of new SBCE models, there are no differences in diagnostic yield; therefore, SBCE endoscopist's performance should be based on experience and availability.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Doença Celíaca , Enteropatias , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Intestino DelgadoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the small bowel is one of the main targets in the gastrointestinal tract. Capsule endoscopy is a safe procedure and can be useful in the diagnosis of GvHD. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy with the histopathologic findings in GvHD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective diagnostic test study included all the patients with suspected GvHD that underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy, with histopathologic evaluation of the biopsies taken, and capsule endoscopy, within the time frame of July 2015 and July 2019. Capsule endoscopy findings were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis, considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with GvHD (7 [33%] women; 37 ± 11.9 years of age) were included, 20 (95%) of whom had acute GvHD. The median gastric transit time of the capsule was 55 minutes (20-113) and the median small bowel transit time was 261 minutes (238-434). The entire small bowel was visualized through capsule endoscopy in 17 cases (80.95%). The histopathologic findings and capsule endoscopy findings resulted in the diagnosis of GvHD in 17 and 16 cases, respectively. There was agreement between the histopathologic and capsule endoscopy findings in 18 cases (15 positive and 3 negative). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy were 88%, 75%, 94%, 60%, and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is a safe tool for the diagnosis of GvHD, with high sensitivity and positive predictive value, as well as moderate agreement with histopathologic findings.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is recognized as a type 1 carcinogen for gastric cancer associated with pre-neoplastic lesions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia [IM]). Its relation with p53, which intervenes in the cell cycle, has had contradictory results. AIMS: To analyze p53 expression in gastric mucosa and its relation with Hp infection. METHODS: A 3-month prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients that had no evidence of acute or clinically significant gastric pathology had biopsies taken according to the Sydney system at the Hospital Juárez de México and the histopathologic studies were done at the Hospital Español de México. RESULTS: Hp prevalence was 32.7% in 104 patients. There were no cases of atrophy or dysplasia. A total of 91% of the infected patients were positive for p53. Of the non-infected patients, 14% were positive for p53 and 60% of them had IM. Of the IM patients, 75% presented with positive p53. Of the patients without IM, 31 presented with positive p53, and Hp was positive in 85% of them. There was association between Hp and p53 and between p53 and IM (P<.0001 and P<.0006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significant association was shown between Hp and p53 expression, even in patients with pre-neoplastic lesions that no longer presented with Hp. Given that the identification of pre-neoplastic lesions is important for the prevention of cancer, immunohistochemistry could benefit routine biopsy carried out during endoscopy for the detection of Hp, by identifying patients with expression of the important oncogene regulator, p53.