RESUMO
The aim of the present study is to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics, complications and outcome of patients with haemophilia and acute head injury (AHI) at the emergency department (ED), and develop a protocol to prevent early and late complications. This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients with haemophilia and AHI admitted to the ED. We identified 26 patients with AHI. A computed tomography scan was carried out on all patients at admission, and again on two patients (with neurosurgical complications) 48 h later. The discharge diagnosis was as follows: 3.8% subdural haematoma, 3.8% cerebellar epidural haematoma and 92.3% uncomplicated AHI. We propose the following protocol: a computed tomography scan upon arrival and another within 48 h post-AHI, unless there is an absence of clinical symptoms. In addition, all patients must self-administer a clotting factor as soon as possible and be observed in the ED for at least 48 h.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Hemofilia A/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Abscesso Epidural/complicações , Feminino , Hematoma Subdural/complicações , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Objetivo: Demostrar la seguridad de la inyección mecánica de contraste a través de catéteres centrales, excluyendo catéteres de hemodiálisis y puertos de quimioterapia, a velocidades > 3 ml/seg. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y prospectivo en pacientes hospitalizados, quienes tenían como única vía de acceso una línea central y en quienes se les realizó inyección mecánica de medio de contraste a una velocidad de 3 y 4 cm3/ seg. Se evaluaron las complicaciones hemodinámicas y relacionadas con la integridad de los catéteres. Resultados: Se inyectaron 20 pacientes a través de catéteres venosos centrales (CVC) y 35 pacientes a través de catéteres centrales de inserción periférica (CCIP). No se presentaron complicaciones hemodinámicas ni se observaron complicaciones relacionadas con la integridad del catéter. Conclusión: La inyección mecánica de medio de contraste a través de CVC y CCIP, utilizando velocidades entre 3 y 4,5 ml/seg es una alternativa segura y viable para tomografías contrastadas.
Objective: The objective is to demonstrate the safety of medium contrast mechanical injection through central lines, not through a hemotherapy port or a hemodialysis catherer, at rates > 3 ml/sec. Methods: We performed a descriptive, longitudinal and prospective injection in patients who had a central line as the only venous access, and who underwent a mechanical injection with medium contrast at a rate 3-4 cc / sec. We evaluated complications in hemodynamics and complications related to the integrity of catherers. Results: 20 patients were injected via central venous catheters (CVC) and 35 patients via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). No complications were observed related to the integrity of the catherer. Conclusion: Medium contrast mechanical injection, performed through CVC and PICC at rates between 3 and 4.5 ml / sec, is considered a safe and viable alternative to contrast-enhanced CT