RESUMO
RESUMEN El protocolo de recuperación optimizada Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) en cirugía colo rrectal promueve un retorno más rápido a la función orgánica siguiendo la evidencia de las últimas investigaciones dirigidas a disminuir el estrés quirúrgico. La vía perioperatoria recomendada está per feccionada, es dinámica y se ajusta a las últimas investigaciones basadas en la evidencia para mejorar todos los aspectos de la atención quirúrgica del paciente. En este artículo describiremos los cuatro aspectos de un paciente a quien se le realizará una cirugía colorrectal: preadmisión, preoperatorio, in traoperatorio y posoperatorio El tema recurrente es disminuir el estrés fisiológico general relacionado con la cirugía; para ello, las intervenciones se superponen a lo largo del recorrido que hace el paciente. Utilizando un enfoque multidisciplinario, la adherencia al protocolo ERAS® en cirugía colorrectal cum pliendo con el 70% o más de las intervenciones de ERAS® ha demostrado una reducción del riesgo de muerte relacionada con el cáncer del 42% a los 5 años. Las intervenciones óptimas no solo se determi nan mediante la publicación de investigaciones de alta calidad, sino que la colaboración internacional periódica permite compartir experiencias e investigaciones y estandarizar los cuidados.
ABSTRACT Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) in colorectal surgery is a protocol that promotes quicker return to function. It follows the latest evidence-based research to promote stress reduction related to surgery. The recommended perioperative pathway is fine-tuned, dynamic and in line with the latest evidence-based research to enhance all aspects of the patient's surgical care. We describe the four aspects for a patient undergoing colorectal surgery - pre-admission, pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative. The running theme is to reduce overall physiological stress related to surgery and interventions overlap throughout the patient's pathway. Using a multidisciplinary approach, adheren ce to ERAS® in colorectal surgery with ≥70 % compliance to the ERAS interventions has shown a risk reduction of 5-year cancer-related death by 42%. The optimum interventions are not only determined through the publication of high-quality research, but regular international collaboration enables expe rience and research to be shared and care standardized.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for self-injurious behavior in young children with developmental delay and to determine whether that group is also more likely to exhibit other challenging behaviors. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 196 children < 6 years of age referred for comprehensive neurodevelopmental evaluations. We analyzed child developmental level, receptive and expressive communication level, mobility, visual and auditory impairment, and co-morbid diagnoses of cerebral palsy, seizure disorders, and autism. RESULTS: Sixty-three children (32%; mean age = 42.7 mo, 63% male) were reported to engage in self-injurious behavior at the time of the evaluation. Children with and without self-injurious behavior did not differ on overall developmental level, expressive or receptive language level, mobility status or sensory functioning, or in rates of identification with cerebral palsy, seizure disorders, or autism. However, the self-injurious behavior group was rated significantly higher by parents on destructive behavior, hurting others, and unusual habits. CONCLUSIONS: Although self-injurious behavior was reported to occur in 32% of the cohort, the modal frequency was monthly/weekly and the severity was low. No significant differences were found for risk markers reported for adults, adolescents, and older children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. However, self-injurious behavior was comorbid with other behavior problems in this sample.