RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that both perioperative and anesthesia-related cardiac arrest (CA) and mortality rates are much higher in developing countries than in developed countries. This review aimed to compare the rates of perioperative and anesthesia-related CA and mortality during 2 time periods in Brazil. METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis of full-text Brazilian observational studies was conducted by searching the Medline, EMBASE, LILACS and SciELO databases up to January 29, 2020. The primary outcomes were perioperative CA and mortality rates and the secondary outcomes included anesthesia-related CA and mortality events rates up to 48 postoperative hours. RESULTS: Eleven studies including 719,273 anesthetic procedures, 962 perioperative CAs, 134 anesthesia-related CAs, 1,239 perioperative deaths and 29 anesthesia-related deaths were included. The event rates were evaluated in 2 time periods: pre-1990 and 1990-2020. Perioperative CA rates (per 10,000 anesthetics) decreased from 39.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.60-45.50) before 1990 to 17.61 (95% CI: 9.21-28.68) in 1990-2020 (P < 0.0001), while the perioperative mortality rate did not alter (from 19.25 [95% CI: 15.64-23.24] pre-1990 to 25.40 [95% CI: 13.01-41.86] in 1990-2020; P = 0.1984). Simultaneously, the anesthesia-related CA rate decreased from 14.39 (95% CI: 11.29-17.86) to 3.90 (95% CI: 2.93-5.01; P < 0.0001), while there was no significant difference in the anesthesia-related mortality rate (from 1.75 [95% CI: 0.76-3.11] to 0.67 [95% CI: 0.09-1.66; P = 0.5404). CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates an important reduction in the perioperative CA rate over time in Brazil, with a large and consistent decrease in the anesthesia-related CA rate; however, there were no significant differences in perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates between the assessed time periods.
Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Brasil , Parada Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Período Perioperatório , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
In 2006, a previous study at our institution reported high perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates of 21.97 and 1.12 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. Since then, changes in surgical practices may have decreased these rates. However, the actual perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates in Brazil remains unknown. The study aimed to reexamine perioperative and anesthesia-related mortality rates in one Brazilian tertiary teaching hospital.In this observational study, deaths occurring in the operation room and postanesthesia care unit between April 2005 and December 2012 were identified from an anesthesia database. The data included patient characteristics, surgical procedures, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and medical specialty teams, as well as the types of surgery and anesthesia. All deaths were reviewed and grouped by into 1 of 4 triggering factors groups: totally anesthesia-related, partially anesthesia-related, surgery-related, or disease/condition-related. The mortality rates are expressed per 10,000 anesthetics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).A total of 55,002 anesthetics and 88 deaths were reviewed, representing an overall mortality rate of 16.0 per 10,000 anesthetics (95% CI: 13.0-19.7). There were no anesthesia-related deaths. The major causes of mortality were patient disease/condition-related (13.8, 95% CI: 10.7-16.9) followed by surgery-related (2.2, 95% CI: 1.0-3.4). The major risks of perioperative mortality were children younger than 1-year-old, older patients, patients with poor ASA physical status (III-V), emergency, cardiac or vascular surgeries, and multiple surgeries performed under the same anesthetic technique (Pâ<â0.0001).There were no anesthesia-related deaths. However, the high mortality rate caused by the poor physical conditions of some patients suggests that primary prevention might be the key to reducing perioperative mortality. These findings demonstrate the need to improve medical perioperative practices for high-risk patients in under-resourced settings.
Assuntos
Anestesia/mortalidade , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ischemic acute kidney injury is a common occurrence in the perioperative period and in critical patients admitted to intensive care units. The reestablishment of blood supply may worsen injury through the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) mechanism. We investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine on the kidneys of rats subjected to an experimental I/R model. METHODS: 34 rats anesthetized with isoflurane was undergone right nephrectomy and randomly assigned to four groups: Control C (saline solution); Dexmedetomidine D (dexmedetomidine); Sham S (saline solution); Sham with Dexmedetomidine SD (dexmedetomidine). The serum levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were measured at time-points T1 (following stabilization), T2 (ischemia), T3 (reperfusion), T4 (12 h after of I/R). The kidneys were subjected to histological examination. RESULTS: The NGAL levels were significantly higher at T4 compared with T1. Upon histological examination, the left kidneys in groups C and D exhibited a similar extent of cell injury. CONCLUSION: The levels of NGAL did not indicate either protection against or worsening of kidney injury. Histological examination for acute tubular necrosis showed that dexmedetomidine did not protect the kidneys from I/R.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Túbulos Renais/patologia , Lipocalinas/sangue , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/sangue , Traumatismo por Reperfusão , Injúria Renal Aguda/sangue , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/patologia , Proteínas de Fase Aguda , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacologia , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Lipocalina-2 , Substâncias Protetoras/farmacologia , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/sangue , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: A previous survey performed in our institution demonstrated perioperative pediatric cardiac arrest and mortality rates of 22.9 and 9.8 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively, and an anesthesia-related cardiac arrest rate of 4.58 per 10,000 anesthetics. Changes in pediatric practices (i.e., safer anesthesia techniques and change in population) may have altered cardiac arrest rates. The aim of this investigation was to reexamine the perioperative and anesthesia-related cardiac arrest rates, causes, and outcomes in a Brazilian institution. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Children less than 18 years old, who were administered an anesthetic between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010, were included in this study. The cardiac arrest cases were identified from an anesthesia database. The data included children's characteristics, surgical procedures, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, surgical areas, and surgery type. The outcomes were perioperative cardiac arrest and mortality and anesthesia-related (totally or partially) cardiac arrest and mortality. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 10,649 anesthetics during the study period, with 22 perioperative cardiac arrests and 11 deaths (20.65 and 10.32 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively). A high incidence of perioperative cardiac arrest occurred in American Society of Anesthesiologists IV-V neonates and infants who underwent emergency surgery. There were no perioperative cardiac arrests in children aged 13 through 17, no anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III children, and no totally anesthesia-related cardiac arrest. The anesthesia-related cardiac arrest rate was 2.81 per 10,000 anesthetics, with no anesthesia-related mortality. Respiratory events accounted for all of the anesthesia-related cardiac arrests. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvements achieved in the pediatric anesthesia safety in our institution, the perioperative cardiac arrest rates are still high and similar to the developing countries rates, with the child's disease or condition being the most important trigger for cardiac arrest. Airway management continues to be the greatest cause of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest.