RESUMO
In order to show the development and scope of a serological analysis method based on fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) from a drop of blood obtained by the capillary technique, a Brucella antibody assay was performed on a group of 321 high-risk workers. The results were compared with data from the analysis of blood serum by FPA and a competitive enzyme immunoassay (ELISA-c). The number of concordance was 318 (99.06%), and discordant 3 (0.93%), which were negative in serum by fluorescence polarization (FPAs) and ELISA-c, but positive with capillary FPA (FPAc). The comparative results FPAc were: sensitivity 100%; specificity: 99.05%; positive predictive value 66.67%; negative predictive value 100.0%; false positive rate: 0.95%; false negative rate: 0%; accuracy: 98.0%; odds ratio: 203.00. The youden J for both FPA methods was 0.667. The identification was considered reliable and the correlation of both procedures, FPA and ELISA-c, was no statistically different (P > 0.05%), which allows to highly recommend the study implementation of human brucellosis with capillary blood as a preliminary method.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Brucella/imunologia , Imunoensaio de Fluorescência por Polarização/métodos , Matadouros , Adulto , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Brucelose/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Medicina VeterináriaRESUMO
A objeto de mostrar el desarrollo y alcance de un método de análisis serológico basado en la técnica de fluorescencia polarizada (FPA) a partir de una gota de sangre obtenida mediante punción capilar, se realizó la determinación de anticuerpos antibrucelosis de un conjunto de 321 personas de alto riesgo laboral. Los resultados se compararon con la data proveniente del análisis de sueros sanguíneos mediante FPA e inmunoanálisis enzimático competitivo (ELISA-c). El número de concordantes fue 318 (99,06%), los 3 discordantes (0,93%) resultaron negativos con fluorescencia polarizada en suero (FPAs) y ELISA-c, pero positivos con FPA capilar (FPAc). Los resultados comparativos de FPAc fueron: sensibilidad: 100%; especificidad: 99,05%; valor predictivo positivo: 66,67%; valor predictivo negativo: 100,0%; proporción de falsos positivos: 0,95%; proporción de falsos negativos: 0%; exactitud: 98,0%; razón de probabilidades: 203,00. La J de Youden para ambos métodos de FPA fue de 0,667. La determinación se consideró confiable y la concordancia de ambos procedimientos de FPA y ELISA-c resultó sin diferencias estadísticas (P>0,05%), lo que permite recomendar ampliamente la implementación del estudio de la brucelosis humana con sangre proveniente de punción capilar como método preliminar.
In order to show the development and scope of a serological analysis method based on fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) from a drop of blood obtained by the capillary technique, a Brucella antibody assay was performed on a group of 321 high-risk workers. The results were compared with data from the analysis of blood serum by FPA and a competitive enzyme immunoassay (ELISA-c). The number of concordance was 318 (99.06%), and discordant 3 (0.93%), which were negative in serum by fluorescence polarization (FPAs) and ELISA-c, but positive with capillary FPA (FPAc). The comparative results FPAc were: sensitivity 100%; specificity: 99.05%; positive predictive value 66.67%; negative predictive value 100.0%; false positive rate: 0.95%; false negative rate: 0%; accuracy: 98.0%; odds ratio: 203.00. The youden J for both FPA methods was 0.667. The identification was considered reliable and the correlation of both procedures, FPA and ELISA-c, was no statistically different (P> 0.05%), which allows to highly recommend the study implementation of human brucellosis with capillary blood as a preliminary method.