RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To increase the percentage of patients who undergo rapid magnetic resonance imaging (rMRI) rather than computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) from 45% in 2020 to 80% by December 2021. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quality improvement initiative targeted to patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department presenting with mild TBI, with baseline data collected from January 2020 to December 2020. From January 2021 to August 2021, we implemented a series of improvement interventions and tracked the percentage of patients undergoing neuroimaging who received rMRI as their initial study. Balancing measures included proportion of all patients with mild TBI who underwent neuroimaging of any kind, proportion of patients requiring sedation, emergency department length of stay, and percentage with clinically important TBI. RESULTS: The utilization of rMRI increased from a baseline of 45% to a mean of 92% in the intervention period. Overall neuroimaging rates did not change significantly after the intervention (19.8 vs 23.2%, P = .24). There was no difference in need for anxiolysis (12 vs 7%, P = .30) though emergency department length of stay was marginally increased (1.4 vs 1.7 hours, P = < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this quality improvement initiative, transition to rMRI as the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of minor TBI was achieved at a level 1 pediatric trauma center with no significant increase in overall use of neuroimaging.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Traumatismos Cranianos Fechados , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Traumatismos Cranianos Fechados/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Neuroimagem/métodos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Institute of Medicine identified emergency department (ED) crowding as a critical threat to patient safety. We assess the association between changes in publicly reported ED length of stay (LOS) and changes in quality-of-care measures in a national cohort of hospitals. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of 2012 and 2013 data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Survey, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Cost Reports, and CMS Hospital Compare. We included hospitals reporting Hospital Compare timeliness measure of LOS for admitted patients. We used AHA and CMS data to incorporate hospital predictors of interest. We used the method of first differences to test for relationships in the change over time between timeliness measures and six hospital-level measures. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2,619 hospitals. Each additional hour of ED LOS was associated with a 0.7% decrease in proportion of patients giving a top satisfaction rating, a 0.7% decrease in proportion of patients who would "definitely recommend" the hospital, and a 6-minute increase in time to pain management for long bone fracture (p < 0.01 for all). A 1-hour increase in ED LOS is associated with a 44% increase in the odds of having an increase in left without being seen (95% confidence interval = 25% to 68%). ED LOS was not associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.14) or time to percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: In this longitudinal study of hospitals across the United States, improvements in ED timeliness measures are associated with improvements in the patient experience.