Assuntos
Quelantes/uso terapêutico , Hiperpotassemia/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Polímeros/uso terapêutico , Potássio/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Quelantes/efeitos adversos , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Hiperpotassemia/sangue , Hiperpotassemia/diagnóstico , Hiperpotassemia/etiologia , Imunossupressores/sangue , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Segurança do Paciente , Polímeros/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Tacrolimo/sangue , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Outcomes after kidney transplantation for patients with amyloidosis-associated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have not been well characterized. METHODS: We performed a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study with Cox proportional hazards modeling using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing including patients transplanted from 1987 to 2015 (N = 310 629). RESULTS: Amyloidosis patients (N = 576) had higher rates of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.95) and graft loss (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19-1.87) compared with nonamyloidosis patients. The results were similar when the cohort was restricted to patients transplanted on or after 2001 (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.31-2.26 for death; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.35-2.33 for graft loss). However, there was no significant difference in risk of death or graft loss when amyloidosis patients were compared with those with diabetes-associated ESRD (mortality: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84-1.17; allograft loss: HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20), or when compared with elderly patients (age, >65 years at the time of transplant) (mortality: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.21; graft loss: HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.82-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with amyloidosis-associated ESRD deemed suitable for transplantation, patient and graft survivals are diminished compared to kidney transplant recipients overall, but are comparable to other high-risk subgroups.
Assuntos
Amiloidose/complicações , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Differences in tacrolimus dosing across ancestries is partly attributable to polymorphisms in CYP3A5 genes that encode tacrolimus-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A5 enzymes. The CYP3A5*1 allele, preponderant in African Americans, is associated with rapid metabolism, subtherapeutic concentrations, and higher dose requirements for tacrolimus, all contributing to worse outcomes. Little is known about the relationship between CYP3A5 genotype and the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic area under the curve (AUC) profile in African Americans or whether pharmacogenetic differences exist between conventional twice-daily, rapidly absorbed, immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LifeCycle Pharma Tac [LCPT]) with a delayed absorption profile. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective crossover study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 50 African American maintenance kidney recipients on stable IR-Tac dosing. INTERVENTION: Recipients were randomly assigned to continue IR-Tac on days 1 to 7 and then switch to LCPT on day 8 or receive LCPT on days 1 to 7 and then switch to IR-Tac on day 8. The LCPT dose was 85% of the IR-Tac total daily dose. OUTCOMES: Tacrolimus 24-hour AUC (AUC0-24), peak and trough concentrations (Cmax and Cmin), time to peak concentration, and bioavailability of LCPT versus IR-Tac, according to CYP3A5 genotype. MEASUREMENTS: CYP3A5 genotype, 24-hour tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles. RESULTS: â¼80% of participants carried the CYP3A5*1 allele (CYP3A5 expressers). There were no significant differences in AUC0-24 or Cmin between CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers during administration of either IR-Tac or LCPT. With IR-Tac, tacrolimus Cmax was 33% higher in CYP3A5 expressers compared with nonexpressers (P=0.04): With LCPT, this difference was 11% (P=0.4). LIMITATIONS: This was primarily a pharmacogenetic study rather than an efficacy study; the follow-up period was too short to capture clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations with IR-Tac in most African Americans results in significantly higher peak concentrations, potentially magnifying the risk for toxicity and adverse outcomes. This pharmacogenetic effect is attenuated by delayed tacrolimus absorption with LCPT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, with study number NCT01962922.
Assuntos
Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/genética , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/farmacocinética , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/genética , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos Cross-Over , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Imunossupressores/farmacocinética , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Farmacogenética , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Introduction: Warfarin causes arterial calcification, arterial stiffness and systolic hypertension in animals. Early evidence in humans indicates that a similar effect may occur in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension. Objective: To evaluate whether warfarin use causes elevated blood pressure and pulse pressure in patients with both DM and hypertension. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 159 subjects with both DM and hypertension who received warfarin for at least 2 years and 159 age-matched control subjects with DM and hypertension never exposed to warfarin. The primary focus of analysis was the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP) between the two groups. Results: Average age was 73±10 years in both groups. Patients in the warfarin group had received it for an average of 5.5±3.1 years. Subjects in the warfarin group had higher rates of coronary disease and heart failure. SBP and PP were lower in the warfarin group (SBP 130±14 mmHg vs. 134±12 mmHg, P=0.003; PP 58±12 mmHg vs. 62±11 mmHg, P=0.004), while DBP was not different (72±8 vs. 72±7 mmHg, P=0.64). Warfarin patients received more antihypertensive drugsand were seen more often than controls. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for relevant variables did not disclose an association between warfarin useand higher BP; on the contrary, exposure to warfarin was associated with lower SBP and PP on the multivariable models. Conclusion: Use of warfarin in conventional doses for an average of 5.5 years was not associated with increased BP in this cross-sectional study of patients with DM and hypertension.
Introdução: Em animais, a warfarina provoca calcificação arterial, rigidez arterial e hipertensão arterial (HA) sistólica. Dados preliminares em humanos sugerem que o mesmo efeito pode acontecer em pacientes com diabetes mellitus (DM) e/ou HA. Objetivo: Determinar se o uso da warfarina em pacientescom DM e HA resulta em elevação da pressão arterial ou pressão de pulso. Métodos: Estudo transversal de 159 pacientes com DM e HA que haviam sidotratados com warfarina por pelo menos 2 anos, e 159 controles pareados por idade, com DM e HA, mas que nunca haviam usado warfarina. O enfoqueprincipal na análise foi a diferença na pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), diastólica (PAD) e pressão de pulso (PP) entre os dois grupos. Resultados: A média de idade foi 73±10 anos em ambos os grupos. Os pacientes no grupo da warfarina haviam usado a droga por 5.5±3.1 anos. Pacientes no grupo da warfarina tinham uma prevalência maior de doença coronariana e insuficiência cardíaca. A PAS e PP foram mais baixas no grupo warfarina (PAS 130±14 mmHgvs. 134±12 mmHg, P=0.003; PP 58±12 mmHg vs. 62±11 mmHg, P=0.004), mas a PAD não diferiu entre os grupos (72±8 vs. 72±7 mmHg, P=0.64).Pacientes do grupo warfarina usaram mais drogas antihipertensivas e foram avaliados clinicamente com maior freqüência do que os controles. Regressão múltipla ajustada para fatores de relevância clínica não demonstrou nenhuma associação entre o uso da warfarina e elevação da pressão arterial. Pelo contrário, nos modelos de regressão múltipla, a exposição à warfarina associou-se a valores mais baixos de PAS e PP. Conclusão: O uso da warfarina em doses convencionais, por 5.5 anos, não associou-se a um aumento da pressão arterial neste estudo tranversal de pacientes com DM e hipertensão.