RESUMO
Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been applied to many aspects of head and neck reconstruction. We describe the use of VSP to create auricular templates in addition to cartilage cutting and suturing guides for microtia repair in two patients with unilateral and bilateral grade 3 microtia. Both patients had satisfactory aesthetic results. This technique allows for increased precision, may decrease operative time, and good cosmetic outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Controversies exist regarding the role of perioperative antibiotic use in pediatric craniomaxillofacial fracture repair. PURPOSE: This study aims to identify factors associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns and measures the association between antibiotic exposure and postoperative infections. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: In this retrospective cohort study, TriNetX, a research database, was used to gather data on patients under 18 years of age who underwent repair of facial fractures. The records were obtained from 2003 to 2021. Current Procedural Terminology codes for facial fracture procedures were used to identify patients. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Antibiotic use, defined as a binary categorical variable of whether or not patients received perioperative antibiotics. The secondary predictor variable was timing of antibiotic administration, categorized by pre, intra, and postoperative administration. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: Postoperative infection, determined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision codes within patient charts. COVARIATES: Covariates included demographic variables such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic location, and fracture characteristics, such as number of fractures and location of fracture. ANALYSES: χ2 analyses were used for categorical variables and two sample t tests for quantitative variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate patient infection and antibiotic use with adjustment for covariates. P-values were 2-tailed and statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: This cohort included 5,413 patients of which 70.4% were male, 74.4% identified as white, and 83.3% identified as non-Hispanic or Latino. There were no differences in postoperative infections in patients who received antibiotics compared to those who did not (0.9 vs 0.5%, respectively, P = .12). Nevertheless, antibiotic prescriptions have increased over the years. After controlling for relevant covariates, antibiotic use did not decrease the odds of infection (adjusted odds ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.34, P = .79). There was a significant association between the timing of antibiotic use and infection (P = .044), with increased odds of infection when antibiotics were given postoperatively (adjusted odds ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 12.07, P = .023). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: While antibiotic prescriptions have increased over the years, this study demonstrates there is no difference in postoperative infection rates for pediatric patients prescribed antibiotics and those where were not.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Adolescente , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fraturas Cranianas/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Advances in operative management, minimally invasive procedures, and physical therapy have allowed for dramatic improvements in functional and cosmetic outcomes in patients with facial paralysis. Our goal was to evaluate the current trends and practice patterns in the diagnosis and management of facial paralysis by provider demographics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS). Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment were compared by level of training (fellowship-trained facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon versus non-fellowship trained), practice type (academic and private), practice length, patient volume, and presence of a dedicated facial nerve clinic. The bivariate associations of the outcome variables and the stratification factors were analyzed using 2-way contingency tables and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 1129 members of the AAFPRS. The response rate was 11.7% (n=132). Most respondents were fellowship-trained surgeons (79%) in the academic setting (55%), and most have been in practice for more than 10 years (53%). Practice setting and patient volume were the factors most associated with significant variations in management, including the use of facial paralysis grading scales, photography/videography, patient-reported outcome metrics, as well as differences in both noninvasive and surgical management. CONCLUSION: Based on the present study, several physician demographic factors may play a role in choosing which diagnostic and treatment options are employed for facial paralysis, with practice setting and patient volume appearing to be the 2 variables associated with the most significant differences.
Assuntos
Paralisia Facial , Cirurgiões , Cirurgia Plástica , Paralisia Facial/diagnóstico , Paralisia Facial/cirurgia , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Our review serves as a safety resource based on the current literature and is aimed at providing best-practice recommendations. Specifically, this article is focused on considerations in the management of craniomaxillofacial trauma as well as reconstructive procedures after head and neck oncologic resection. METHODS: Relevant clinical data were obtained from peer-reviewed journal articles, task force recommendations, and published guidelines from multiple medical organizations utilizing data sources including PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and Google search queries. Relevant publications were utilized to develop practice guidelines and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The global COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant strain on health care resources with resultant impacts on patient care. Surgeons operating in the head and neck are particularly at risk of occupational COVID-19 exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and must therefore be cognizant of protocols in place to mitigate exposure risk and optimize patient care.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/cirurgia , Face/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/normas , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Nasal bone stabilization, in the setting of comminuted nasal fracture or surgical osteotomy, represents a challenging surgical experience. Postoperative shifting of osseous fragments may result in compromised outcomes in an otherwise well-performed procedure. Although prior studies have reported nasal bone fixation with implementation of wires, plates, or halos, these techniques are often difficult to employ routinely. Herein, the authors describe a novel and facile technique for the maintenance of unstable nasal bones using customized intranasal bolsters.