RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To measure parental perceptions of child vulnerability, as a precursor to developing a population-scale mechanism to mitigate harm after newborn screening. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were parents of infants aged 2-5 months. Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were assessed with an adapted version of the Vulnerable Baby Scale. The scale was included in the script for a larger study of telephone follow-up for 2 newborn blood screening samples (carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy). A comparison sample was added using a paper survey with well-baby visits to an urban/suburban clinic. RESULTS: Sample sizes consisted of 288 parents in the cystic fibrosis group, 426 in the sickle cell hemoglobinopathy group, and 79 in the clinic comparison group. Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were higher in the sickle cell group than cystic fibrosis group (P < .0001), and both were higher than the clinic comparison group (P < .0001). Parental perceptions of child vulnerability were inversely correlated with parental age (P < .002) and lower health literacy (P < .015, sickle cell hemoglobinopathy group only). CONCLUSIONS: Increased parental perceptions of child vulnerability seem to be a bona fide complication of incidental newborn blood screening findings, and healthcare professionals should be alert to the possibility. From a public health perspective, we recommend routine follow-up after incidental findings to mitigate psychosocial harm.
Assuntos
Portador Sadio/psicologia , Triagem Neonatal/efeitos adversos , Pais/psicologia , Adulto , Anemia Falciforme/genética , Anemia Falciforme/psicologia , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fibrose Cística/genética , Fibrose Cística/psicologia , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/psicologia , Relações Pais-Filho , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síndrome , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To conduct interviews with a multiyear sample of parents of infants found to have heterozygous status for sickle cell hemoglobinopathy or cystic fibrosis during newborn blood screening (NBS). STUDY DESIGN: Interviewers with clinical backgrounds telephoned parents, and followed a structured script that blended follow-up and research purposes. Recruiting followed several steps to minimize recruiting bias as much as possible for a NBS study. RESULTS: Follow-up calls were conducted with parents of 426 infant carriers of sickle cell hemoglobinopathy, and 288 parents of cystic fibrosis carriers (34.8% and 49.6% of those eligible). Among these, 27.5% and 7.8% had no recollection of being informed of NBS results. Of those who recalled a provider explanation, 8.6% and 13.0% appraised the explanation negatively. Overall, 7.4% and 13.2% were dissatisfied with the experience of learning about the NSB result. Mean anxiety levels were low but higher in the sickle cell hemoglobinopathy group (P < .001). Misconceptions that the infant might get the disease were present in 27.5% and 7.8% of parents (despite zero actual risk for disease). Several of these data were significantly predicted by NBS result, health literacy, parental age, and race/ethnicity factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered public health follow-up can be effective after NBS identifies carrier status. Psychosocial complications were uncommon, but harms were substantial enough to justify mitigation.