RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In breast IMRT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) treatment and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), proper delineation of the tumor bed is necessary. Conservative oncoplastic surgery causes changes in peritumoral breast tissue that complicates locating the site of the tumor. Nevertheless, there are still centers that do not use surgical clips to delineate the site. This study aims to show how the lack of clips affects the techniques of SIB and APBI in terms of dose distribution and safety margins in the tumor bed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On 30 patients, the defining of the tumor bed obtained from the pre-surgery CT scan to that outlined on the basis of clips on the post-surgery CT was compared. Tumor bed deviation from the original tumor site was quantified. In addition, the margins to the original tumor site necessary to guarantee the coverage of the tumor bed were calculated. RESULTS: Variations were detected in the distances between geometric centers of the PTV (minimum 0.5-maximum 3 cm). The maximum margin necessary to include the entire tumor bed was 4.5 cm. Lesions located in the upper outer quadrant required the widest margins. If margins are not added, the tumor bed volume defined with clips will be underdosed. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of the tumor bed based on studies before surgery does not have the necessary accuracy. Clips need to be placed in the surgical bed to identify the changes occurring after the restorative mammoplasty. Without clips, SIB and APBI are not safe.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Little is known of practice patterns on advanced prostate cancer (PC) in Spain. The study objectives were to investigate practice patterns in the management of PC and to determine the adherence to the 2007 Spanish guidelines for the management of PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epidemiological, cross-sectional study was undertaken. Study-specific questionnaires were distributed to all centers with radiation oncology (RO) facilities delivering megavoltage radiation therapy (RT) in Spain (n = 108). A questionnaire evaluated diagnostic and treatment approaches to PC in low-risk and high-risk cases. And a 12-item questionnaire was used to assess guidelines adherence. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 102 centers (94.0 % response rate). In the high-risk scenario, the majority of clinicians (99.0 %) chose combined modality treatment with RT and androgen deprivation (AD) and 93.0 % recommended long-term AD. External-beam RT (EBRT) doses ranging 72-76 Gy were used in 59.5 % of centers and >76 Gy was employed in 40.5 %. In the low-risk scenario, EBRT was chosen by 59.6 %, brachytherapy by 39.4 %, and active surveillance by 1 %. The consensus was high (score 5 + 4 ≥ 90 %) on 8/12 questions assessing adherence to guidelines, being high specifically on items related to RT technique, RT dose, combination of HT and RT in intermediate/high-risk patients, and prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest survey to date of Spanish RO departments dealing with PC. The study results therefore likely provide a highly reliable picture of clinical practice in Spain in this century and show how this practice is influenced by clinical evidence from randomized trials and consensus conferences.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this follow-up pattern of care study was to evaluate current clinical practices, staffing and equipment, and to compare these results to a study performed 5 years previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive, pattern of care study was carried out via an online questionnaire. The survey was sent to a total of 95 cancer care centres in Spain. RESULTS: Seventy-three centres (76.8%) responded to the survey. More than half (57.5%) of responding centres offered brachytherapy (BT). A mean of 120 patients/centre were treated by BT in 2007. The most common localisations were the endometrium (29.6% of cases), prostate (29.6%), cervix uteri (14.6%), breast (12.6%), head and neck (3.6%) and vagina (2.5%). Other sites accounted for less than 2% of cases each. Most centres that offered BT (33/40 = 82.5%) were equipped with a dedicated BT operating room. The most commonly reported dosimetric method was CT dosimetry (31 of 40 centres = 77.5%), followed by plain film (30/40 = 75%), ultrasound (26/40 = 65%), MRI (8/40 = 20%), in vivo (7/40 = 17.5%) and PET-CT (5/40 = 12.5%) dosimetry. CONCLUSION: The three most common treatment sites (gynaecological, breast and prostate) remain unchanged from 2002, with prostate treatments showing large increase. Advanced dosimetric techniques (MRI, PET-CT and CT-dosimetry) continue to gain adherents. Some centres treat small numbers of patients, a finding that deserves more attention in terms of cost and quality of care. Although BT remains strong in Spain, it could be further strengthened by making modern dosimetric techniques and treatments more widely available.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the tumours with the highest incidence in recent years. PC therapies have several adverse effects. A panel consensus recommendation has been made to prevent or ameliorate complications in PC treatment to improve quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen specialists have met to analyse the different toxicities associated with PC treatment. Each medical specialist performed a National Library of Medicine PubMed search citations searching about these secondary effects and his specialty from 1999 to 2009 to propose measures for their prevention/amelioration. RESULTS: Surgery is associated with incontinence and impotence. Radiotherapy can produce acute, late urological and gastrointestinal toxicity. Brachytherapy can produce acute urinary retention. Chemotherapy is associated with haematotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy and diarrhoea, and hormone therapy can produce osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, cognitive and muscular alterations, cardiotoxicity, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in surgical techniques and technology (IMRT/IGRT) can prevent surgical and radiotherapeutic toxicity, respectively. Brachytherapy toxicity can be prevented with precise techniques to preserve the urethra. Chemotherapy toxicity can be prevented with personalized schedules of treatment and close follow-up of iatrogenia and hormone therapy toxicity can be prevented with close follow-up of possible secondary effects.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this pattern of care survey was to provide an overview of brachytherapy resources and practices in the United Kingdom (UK) and Spain and to identify differences that may be relevant to health-care delivery and planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Both countries formed part of a larger survey of European radiation oncology centres carried out in 2002. The present study includes only data from centres that perform brachytherapy and completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2002, the number of hospitals offering brachytherapy increased by 10.2% in the UK and 21.4% in Spain. The mean number of radiotherapy patients per centre was significantly higher in the UK (2811 patients) than in Spain (1203). Gynaecological tumours accounted for most procedures (59.7% in Spain and 60.8% in the UK), followed by prostate cancer in the UK (16.7%) and breast cancer in Spain (15.5%). Significantly more procedures for breast cancer were performed in Spain (19.7 patients/centre) than in the UK (0.4 patients/centre). A significantly higher percentage of radiation oncologists in Spain performed brachytherapy, dedicating more time to brachytherapy-related work (22.2 h/week) than their colleagues in the UK (6.7 h/week). CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy resources and patterns of care are similar in both countries, although several notable differences exist. Radiation oncologists in Spain dedicate significantly more time to brachytherapy. Compared to the UK, brachytherapy is used more frequently in Spain as a boost in breast cancer treatments. Both countries perform more brachytherapy procedures for prostate cancer than the European average.

Assuntos