RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death globally. In 2014, the United Nations committed to reducing premature mortality from NCDs, including by reducing the burden of healthcare costs. Since 2014, the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study has been collecting health expenditure data from households with NCDs in 18 countries. METHODS: Using data from the PURE Study, we estimated risk of catastrophic health spending and impoverishment among households with at least one person with NCDs (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, cancer and respiratory diseases; n=17 435), with hypertension only (a leading risk factor for NCDs; n=11 831) or with neither (n=22 654) by country income group: high-income countries (Canada and Sweden), upper middle income countries (UMICs: Brazil, Chile, Malaysia, Poland, South Africa and Turkey), lower middle income countries (LMICs: the Philippines, Colombia, India, Iran and the Occupied Palestinian Territory) and low-income countries (LICs: Bangladesh, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and Tanzania) and China. RESULTS: The prevalence of catastrophic spending and impoverishment is highest among households with NCDs in LMICs and China. After adjusting for covariates that might drive health expenditure, the absolute risk of catastrophic spending is higher in households with NCDs compared with no NCDs in LMICs (risk difference=1.71%; 95% CI 0.75 to 2.67), UMICs (0.82%; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.27) and China (7.52%; 95% CI 5.88 to 9.16). A similar pattern is observed in UMICs and China for impoverishment. A high proportion of those with NCDs in LICs, especially women (38.7% compared with 12.6% in men), reported not taking medication due to costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that financial protection from healthcare costs for people with NCDs is inadequate, particularly in LMICs and China. While the burden of NCD care may appear greatest in LMICs and China, the burden in LICs may be masked by care foregone due to costs. The high proportion of women reporting foregone care due to cost may in part explain gender inequality in treatment of NCDs. (AU)
Assuntos
Sistemas de Saúde , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Seguro Saúde , Diabetes MellitusRESUMO
Psychosocial stress has been proposed to contribute to obesity, particularly abdominal, or centralobesity, through chronic activation of the neuroendocrine systems. However, these putative relationships are complex anddependent on country and cultural context. We investigated the association between psychosocial factors and general andabdominal obesity in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic study.SUBJECTS/METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study enrolled 151 966 individuals aged 3570 years from 628 urban andrural communities in 17 high-, middle- and low-income countries. Data were collected for 125 290 individuals regarding education,anthropometrics, hypertension/diabetes, tobacco/alcohol use, diet and psychosocial factors (self-perceived stress and depression).RESULTS: After standardization for age, sex, country income and urban/rural location, the proportion with obesity (body massindex ⩾ 30 kgm−2) increased from 15.7% in 40 831 individuals with no stress to 20.5% in 7720 individuals with permanent stress,with corresponding proportions for ethnicity- and sex-specific central obesity of 48.6% and 53.5%, respectively (Po0.0001 forboth). Associations between stress and hypertension/diabetes tended to be inverse. Estimating the total effect of permanent stresswith age, sex, physical activity, education and region as confounders, no relationship between stress and obesity persisted(adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) for obesity 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.991.10)). There was no relationship between ethnicityandsex-specific central obesity (adjusted PR 1.00 (0.971.02)). Stratification by region yielded inconsistent associations. Depressionwas weakly but independently linked to obesity (PR 1.08 (1.041.12)), and very marginally to abdominal obesity (PR 1.01(1.001.03)).