RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study two subsets of patients with GH deficiency (GHD) during the transition period: childhood onset GHD (CO-GHD) and patients who develop GHD during the transition phase (TO-GHD) before and after GH replacement. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In 1340 GHD subjects from KIMS (Pfizer International Metabolic Database), CO (n=586) or TO (n=754), background characteristics, anthropometric measurements, IGF-1, lipids and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated at baseline and after 3 years of GH replacement. RESULTS: Both groups responded similarly to GH treatment. Changes of clinical outcomes were mainly determined by their value at baseline. Onset of the disease in childhood or transition period did not appear to be a significant predictor of response in any of the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Age at GHD diagnosis was a significant predictor for many outcomes at baseline, but disease onset did not appear as an independent predictor concerning changes after 3 years of GH treatment. The results suggest that GH replacement during the transition period should be considered independently of the onset of the deficiency.
Assuntos
Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Hormônio do Crescimento Humano/deficiência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de RegressãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study reports on the Brazilian Portuguese adaptation of the QoL-AGHDA (Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults) for use in adult growth hormone deficient (GHD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation process adopted the dual panel methodology. The questionnaire was tested through field-test interviews (16 GHD patients). In the final stage, data from 120 GHD patients (81 included in a test-retest analysis) were analyzed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and validity among known groups. RESULTS: The translation panels were successful and the draft version was amended to improve the wording as a result of the field-test interviews. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 and test-retest reliability 0.88. QoL-AGHDA scores had the expected pattern of association with NHP scale scores and QoL-AGHDA was able to differentiate significantly between patients based on patient-reported general health (p < 0.01) and QoL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The adaptation of the QoL-AGHDA for a Brazilian population was successful and the adapted questionnaire was shown to be reliable and valid.
OBJETIVO: Este estudo relata o processo de adaptação da versão brasileira do questionário QoL-AGHDA (Quality of Life - Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults) para pacientes com deficiência do hormônio de crescimento (DGH). MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: A tradução adotou a metodologia de duplo painel. O questionário foi testado por intermédio de entrevistas direcionadas com 16 pacientes com DGH. No estágio final, dados de 120 pacientes com DGH (81 com teste/reteste) foram analisados para consistência interna, confiabilidade teste/reteste, validade convergente e validade entre grupos conhecidos. RESULTADOS: Os grupos de tradução foram bem-sucedidos e a versão final foi adaptada seguindo sugestões obtidas das entrevistas com os 16 pacientes. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach foi 0,90, confiabilidade teste/reteste 0,88, escores QoL-AGHDA se correlacionaram com o NHP (p < 0,01) e também com a saúde geral relatada pelos pacientes (p < 0,01). CONCLUSÕES: A adaptação do QoL-AGHDA para a população brasileira foi bem-sucedida, e a nova versão demonstrou ser válida e confiável.
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hormônio do Crescimento Humano/deficiência , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Traduções , Brasil , Idioma , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study reports on the Brazilian Portuguese adaptation of the QoL-AGHDA (Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults) for use in adult growth hormone deficient (GHD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation process adopted the dual panel methodology. The questionnaire was tested through field-test interviews (16 GHD patients). In the final stage, data from 120 GHD patients (81 included in a test-retest analysis) were analyzed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and validity among known groups. RESULTS: The translation panels were successful and the draft version was amended to improve the wording as a result of the field-test interviews. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 and test-retest reliability 0.88. QoL-AGHDA scores had the expected pattern of association with NHP scale scores and QoL-AGHDA was able to differentiate significantly between patients based on patient-reported general health (p < 0.01) and QoL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The adaptation of the QoL-AGHDA for a Brazilian population was successful and the adapted questionnaire was shown to be reliable and valid.