RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the shortcomings of our health care delivery system for vulnerable populations and created a need to rethink health disparity education in medical training. We examined how the early COVID-19 pandemic impacted third-year medical students' attitudes, perceptions, and sense of responsibility regarding health care delivery for vulnerable populations. METHODS: Third-year family medicine clerkship students at a large, private medical school in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania responded to a reflection assignment prompt asking how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their thoughts about health care delivery for vulnerable populations in mid-2020 (N=59). Using conventional content analysis, we identified three main themes across 24 codes. RESULTS: Students recognized homeless individuals and Black, indigenous, and persons of color (BIPOC) as vulnerable populations impacted by the pandemic. Students reported causes of vulnerability that focused heavily on social determinants of health, increased risk for contracting COVID-19 infections, and difficulty adhering to COVID-19 prevention guidelines. Notable action-oriented approaches to addressing these disparities included health care reform and community health intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings describe an educational approach to care for vulnerable populations based on awareness, attitudes, and social action. Medical education must continue to teach students how to identify ways to mitigate disparities in order to achieve health equity.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Formal training in practice transformation, leadership, clinical education, and/or the time to gain these skills are limited postresidency for primary care physicians and physician assistants. Therefore, we created a novel Primary Care Champions fellowship program that provides practical experiences in education, practice transformation, and leadership for primary care physicians and physician assistants in community practice. The purpose of this study is to describe the fellowship and evaluate feedback from the first cohort. METHODS: In the Jefferson Primary Care Champions Fellowship, fellows are provided protected time from clinical obligations to engage in didactic, informal, and experiential learning. They meet monthly and participate in student precepting training and receive mentorship from senior clinician administrators, scientists, educators, and population health researchers to hone skills for leadership and practice transformation endeavors. Cohort one began in September 2018. All fellows were family physicians from community-based practices in Philadelphia, PA (N = 4) and selected in collaboration with their practice leadership. Mixed-methods postprogram evaluations included Organizational Readiness Assessment and qualitative feedback. RESULTS: Fellows denoted individual time, small-group mentorship, protected project time, and open-robust discussions about primary care most useful. Three fellows reported that they plan to continue their practice-improvement projects postfellowship and one published her initial project findings and reflections. DISCUSSION: Overall feedback from the first cohort was positive. Fellows greatly appreciated structured time to explore primary care interests, contemplated long-term career prospects, and considered leadership opportunities. Cohort two is currently underway and cohort three is in recruitment.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Medical schools must integrate educational curricula that teach how to apply quality improvement principles to improve care for vulnerable populations. In this report, we describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a combined quality improvement (QI) and health disparities curriculum for third-year family medicine clerkship students. Methods: After conducting an educational needs assessment, we developed a health disparities curriculum focused on QI principles for the family medicine clerkship. From November 2019 through August 2021, third-year medical students (N=395) completed the curriculum. The curriculum was delivered in an asynchronous online format, followed by a small group collaboration project to design and present a QI intervention through process mapping. Students also completed an individual reflection assignment that focused on care for vulnerable populations. Pre- and post assessment questions were administered on Qualtrics, after review by the clerkship director, research faculty and staff, and content experts for content and item validity. We analyzed quantitative data using SPSS version 27 software and used paired t tests for pre/post comparisons. Results: In total, 392 students completed the preassessment survey, 395 students completed the postassessment surveys, and 341 had matching study identifiers. Pre-to-post assessment survey evaluations showed statistically significant changes for nine out of nine QI knowledge questions (P<.001), knowledge regarding a community health needs assessment (P<.001), and knowledge about caring for vulnerable populations (homeless, veterans, immigrants/refugees; P<.001). Conclusions: Preliminary evaluation of a combined QI and health disparities curriculum shows improvement in students' self-reported knowledge of use of a community health needs assessment, QI principles, and care for vulnerable populations.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Primary care is evolving to meet greater demands for the inclusion of collaborative health care quality improvement (QI) processes at the practice level. Yet, data on organizational preparedness for change are limited. We assessed the feasibility of incorporating an organizational-level readiness-to-change tool that identifies factors relevant to QI implementation at the practice level impacting new family medicine physicians. METHODS: We assessed organizational readiness to change at the practice level among residents participating in a team-based QI training curriculum from April 2016 to April 2019. Seventy-six current and former residents annually completed the modified Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) survey. We evaluated QI and leadership readiness among five subscales: empowerment, management, QI, QI leadership (skills), and QI leadership (ability). We calculated mean survey scores and compared across all 3 years. Resident interviews captured unique perspectives and experiences with team-based activities. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes. RESULTS: Residents completed 73 modified ORCA surveys (96% response rate). Compared to years 2016-2019, 2018 results were highest in mean negative responses for the QI subscale (24.62, SD 6.70). Four volunteers completed postsurvey interviews. Qualitative analysis identified issues concerning communication, team collaboration, practice site functioning, and survey relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study determined that miscommunication and practice site disruptions undermine organizational-level readiness to change, as measured by the ORCA tool which was part of a multimethod assessment included within a team-based QI training curriculum. Training programs undergoing curricula transformations may feasibly incorporate ORCA as a tool to identify impediments to collaborative practice and inform resource allocation important for enhancing physician training in QI leadership.