RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early growth following primary or staged repair of neonatal symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of consecutive infants with sTOF who underwent initial intervention at age ≤30 days, from 2005 to 2017. Management strategies were either primary repair or staged repair (ie, initial palliation followed by complete repair). The primary outcome was change in weight-for-age z-score (ΔWAZ) from the initial intervention to age 6 ± 2 months. Secondary outcomes included method and mode of feeding, feeding-related medications, and feeding-related readmissions. Propensity score adjustment was used to account for baseline differences between groups. A secondary analysis was performed comparing patients stratified by the presence of adequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ > -0.5) or inadequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ ≤ -0.5), independent of treatment strategy. RESULTS: The study cohort included 143 primary repair subjects and 240 staged repair subjects. Prematurity was more common in the staged repair group. After adjustment, median ΔWAZ did not differ between treatment groups over the first 6 months of life (primary: -0.43 [IQR, -1.17 to 0.50]; staged: -0.31 [IQR, -1.31 to 0.71]; P = .55). For the entire cohort, ΔWAZ was negative (-0.36; IQR, -1.21 to 0.63). There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. Secondary analysis revealed that the subjects with adequate growth were more likely to be orally fed at initial hospital discharge (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In neonates with sTOF, growth trajectory over the first 6 months of life was substandard, irrespective of treatment strategy. Those patients with adequate growth were more likely to be discharged from the index procedure on oral feeds.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Tetralogia de Fallot , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tetralogia de Fallot/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness and diagnostic yield of TTEs ordered by various pediatric providers according to the pediatric appropriate use criteria (AUC) for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before its release. STUDY DESIGN: Clinic notes of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent initial outpatient TTE between April and September 2014 were reviewed to determine the AUC indication, and appropriateness was assigned based on the AUC document. Ordering physicians were categorized into cardiologists, primary care physicians (PCPs; including pediatricians and family practitioners [FPs]), and noncardiology subspecialists. RESULTS: Of the 1921 TTEs ordered during the study period, 84.6% were by cardiologists, 9.2% by pediatricians, 3.4% by FPs, and 2.8% by noncardiology subspecialists. The appropriateness rate for cardiologists was higher than that for PCPs (86% vs 64%; P < .001) but not noncardiology subspecialist (86% vs 87%; P = .80). PCPs had a significantly higher proportion of studies that could not be classified compared with cardiologists (35% vs 5%; P < .001) and noncardiology subspecialists (35% vs 11%; P < .001), owing primarily to a lack of adequate clinical information. The likelihood of an abnormal finding was higher in TTEs ordered by a cardiologist vs those ordered by a noncardiologist (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-10.9; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCPs, cardiologists ordered more TTEs, had the highest yield of abnormal findings, and had greater appropriateness of TTE orders. A large proportion of TTEs ordered by PCPs were unclassifiable owing to insufficient information. This study lays a framework for provider education and improvement in the TTE order intake process.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial , Criança , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess awareness and implementation among pediatric primary care providers of the 2012 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the evaluation and management of developmental abnormalities in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). We hypothesized that children with CHD are not being provided neurodevelopmental screening and support according to the AHA guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: An online survey was administered to licensed pediatric primary care providers in Minnesota (pediatricians = 530, family physicians = 1469) to evaluate awareness of the AHA guidelines, current screening practices, and barriers to implementation of these guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 326 providers (17% of 1911 successful e-mails) responded to the survey, which included 148 pediatricians (29% of 518 successful e-mails) and 178 family physicians (13% of 1393 successful e-mails). Overall, 202 providers (62%) reported caring for children with CHD. Among those caring for children with CHD, the most commonly reported reasons for neurodevelopmental referral were nonspecific to CHD. Presence of risks specific to children with CHD, such as history of cyanotic heart disease or open heart surgery as an infant, accounted for only 25% and 22% of the referrals, respectively. Only 21% of providers were aware of the guidelines, and only 7% received guidance from a pediatric cardiologist regarding neurodevelopmental screening in children with CHD. CONCLUSION: There is need for further education of primary care providers on the developmental risks associated with CHD as well as increased involvement by the pediatric cardiology community to enhance the developmental outcomes of children with CHD.