Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 43(9): 833-836.e2, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935774

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Nerve conduction studies (NCS), CTS-6, Wainner, Kamath, and Lo are diagnostic tests that are used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). To our knowledge, no study has compared the sensitivity and specificity of these 5 tests with one another. The purpose of this study is to compare NCS, CTS-6, Wainner, Kamath, and Lo using clinical diagnosis by a hand fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon as reference standard. METHODS: A hand fellowship-trained surgeon completed the CTS-6, Wainner, Kamath, and Lo diagnostic tools. Cutoff values for a positive test were based on values in the literature, if available. The NCS were performed by a certified electrodiagnostic physician according the standards of the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine and were interpreted using absolute latencies, relative latencies, and combined sensory index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were calculated for the tests using clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 408 wrists from 250 patients were analyzed in the study. The NCS had the highest sensitivity (94%) but also the lowest specificity (50%) of any of the diagnostic tests. Using a cutoff of 18, CTS-6 had the highest specificity (99%). The NCS had the highest area under the curve at 74%, followed closely by the Kamath at 69%. CONCLUSIONS: The NCS were traditionally felt to be a strong confirmatory test given their high specificity. However, this prospective series demonstrated that NCS had the lowest specificity of any diagnostic test. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Consideration should be given to using alternative diagnostic tests/tools based on the results of this study.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Eletrodiagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa , Exame Neurológico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Hand Surg Am ; 41(10): 958-962, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27702467

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a correlation between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, as measured using ultrasound, and the distal motor and/or sensory latencies as measured on nerve conduction studies. METHODS: Patients with clinical signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were prospectively enrolled in this study. Subjects underwent ultrasound measurement of the CSA of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet by a fellowship-trained hand surgeon, followed by nerve conduction studies (NCS) by a certified electrodiagnostic technician who was blinded to the results of the ultrasound examination. Pearson correlations were performed to compare CSA and NCS. RESULTS: Pearson correlation was r = 0.57 between CSA and distal motor latency and r = 0.47 between CSA and distal sensory latency. Correlation was r = 0.81 between distal motor latency and distal sensory latency. CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between CSA of the median nerve and NCS. Further research is necessary to determine which test correlates better with patient symptoms and function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Nervo Mediano/fisiopatologia , Condução Nervosa , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA