RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical therapist-led treatment programs are recommended for patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. Views of people with FAI syndrome regarding such interventions are currently unknown, including perceptions of potential barriers and facilitators to participation and adherence to exercise programs. OBJECTIVES: To explore participant perceptions of physical therapist-led programs for FAI syndrome, including barriers and facilitators for accessing physical therapy, and adhering to a rehabilitation program. METHODS: Our qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore the perceptions of patients with FAI syndrome undertaking physical therapy-led treatment, where treatment was ceased due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The interview topic guide was informed by the Theoretical Domain Framework. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data categories were developed using inductive thematic analysis. Themes were discussed between researchers until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Fourteen participants (mean age: 30 years) with a range of physical activity backgrounds undertook interviews. We identified four key themes, 1) Patients believed their hip pain was caused by structural damage worsened through exercise; 2) Barriers and facilitators on the feasibility of physical therapist-led programs; 3) Participants held beliefs regarding the importance of adjunct treatments to exercise; and 4) Impact of FAI syndrome on physical activity participation. CONCLUSION: People with FAI syndrome believe they have structural damage which leads to their hip pain and are often afraid to exercise due to fear of causing more damage to their hip. Our findings suggest that people with FAI syndrome want clear education about exercise, imaging, and expectations of cost and duration of treatment.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Terapia por Exercício , Impacto Femoroacetabular , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Terapia por Exercício/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence whether kinesiophobia affects women and men with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome differently. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between kinesiophobia, quality of life (QoL), pain, and physical function in people with FAI syndrome, and to compare the level of kinesiophobia between women and men with FAI syndrome. METHODS: One-hundred-fifty participants with FAI syndrome (51% women) completed assessment of the following: kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia; patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (pain, physical function, health- and hip-related QoL); physical function (side bridge, hop for distance, and one leg rise); and active hip range of motion (flexion, external rotation, internal rotation). RESULTS: Greater kinesiophobia was correlated with worse hip-related QoL (rho=-0.58; p<0.001), self-reported physical function (rho=-0.42; p<0.001), health-related QoL (rho=-0.46; p<0.001), and pain levels (rho=-0.46; p<0.001). In women, kinesiophobia was also associated with worse physical function (hop for distance r=-0.38; p=0.001 and side bridge rho=-0.24; p=0.036) explaining 36% of the variation of the hip-related QoL, 29% of the health-related QoL, and 27% of the self-reported physical function. In men, kinesiophobia explained 35%, 12%, and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In people with FAI syndrome, greater kinesiophobia was associated with worse PROMs, but not with hip range of motion. No sex-related differences in mean kinesiophobia scores were found. In women, an association was found between kinesiophobia and worse performance in physical tests. These findings might indicate that kinesiophobia plays a more important role in the clinical presentation of women with FAI syndrome than men.
Assuntos
Impacto Femoroacetabular , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , AutorrelatoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the geographic variation of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) and test if variation in geographic factors, such as state, latitude, and longitude, play a role in SUID risk across the US. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Cohort Linked Birth/Infant Death dataset (2005-2010; 22â882 SUID cases, 25â305â837 live births, rate 0.90/1000). SUID was defined as infant deaths (ages 7-364 days) that included sudden infant death syndrome, ill-defined and unknown cause of mortality, and accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed. SUID geographic variation was analyzed using 2 statistical models, logistic regression and generalized additive model (GAM). RESULTS: Both models produced similar results. Without adjustment, there was marked geographic variation in SUID rates, but the variation decreased after adjusting for covariates including known risk factors for SUID. After adjustment, nine states demonstrated significantly higher or lower SUID mortality than the national average. Geographic contribution to SUID risk in terms of latitude and longitude were also attenuated after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSION: Understanding why some states have lower SUID rates may enhance SUID prevention strategies.
Assuntos
Morte Súbita do Lactente/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Geografia Médica , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Estatísticos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) require household survey programmes such as the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to enhance data collection to cover new indicators. This study aims to evaluated methods for assessing water quality, water availability, emptying of sanitation facilities, menstrual hygiene management and the acceptability of water quality testing in households which are key to monitoring SDG targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and emerging issues. METHODS: As part of a MICS field test, we interviewed 429 households and 267 women age 15-49 in Stann Creek, Belize in a split-sample experiment. In a concurrent qualitative component, we conducted focus groups with interviewers and cognitive interviews with respondents during and immediately following questionnaire administration in the field to explore their question comprehension and response processes. FINDINGS: About 88% of respondents agreed to water quality testing but also desired test results, given the potential implications for their own health. Escherichia coli was present in 36% of drinking water collected at the source, and in 47% of samples consumed in the household. Both questions on water availability necessitated probing by interviewers. About one quarter of households reported emptying of pit latrines and septic tanks, though one-quarter could not provide an answer to the question. Asking questions on menstrual hygiene was acceptable to respondents, but required some clarification and probing. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Belize, this study confirmed the feasibility of collecting information on the availability and quality of drinking water, emptying of sanitation facilities and menstrual hygiene in a multi-purpose household survey, indicating specific areas to improve question formulation and field protocols. Improvements have been incorporated into the latest round of MICS surveys which will be a major source of national data for monitoring of SDG targets for drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and emerging issues for WASH sector programming.