Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prostate ; 84(3): 285-291, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37961000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The urinary microbiota of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has been associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), however, little is known about urinary microbiota correlations with clinicopathological parameters associated with BPH. Here, we investigate associations between the urinary microbiota and clinical parameters of patients with BPH undergoing surgery. METHODS: Forty-one patients with BPH undergoing surgery were recruited from two medical centers. Catheterized urine specimens were collected and the microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Patients were segregated into two groups according to each clinical parameter and differences in urinary microbiota diversity and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Higher prostate weight and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were associated with higher alpha diversity in the urinary microbiota of BPH patients. At the specific microbe level, we found that the greater the prostatic weight, the lower the relative abundance of Streptococcus, while the greater the PSA levels, the higher the abundance of Lactobacillus. Treatment with 5-α-reductase inhibitor was associated with overall urinary microbiota composition, in part due to a higher abundance of Corynebacterium and Anaerococcus in this group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the urinary microbiota of BPH patients is associated with clinicopathological features, paving the way for larger studies in which causality between urinary microbiota and BPH can be appropriately explored.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Masculino , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/uso terapêutico , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Próstata , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia
2.
Oncologist ; 28(2): e82-e91, 2023 02 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36082904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cyclin pathway gene alterations are frequent in urothelial tumors and may co-exist with other important aberrations, leading to therapeutic opportunities. We characterized the landscape of cyclin gene alterations in urothelial and non-urothelial urinary tract (UT) malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 6842 urothelial and 897 non-urothelial UT cancers were analyzed (hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profile (Foundation Medicine)). Alteration frequency in cyclin-sensitizing and -resistance genes, and co-occurrence with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene abnormalities were evaluated. RESULTS: Cyclin-activating gene alterations were detected in 47.3% of urothelial and 37.9% of non-urothelial UT cancers. Frequency varied by histology and tumor site. CDKN2A and CDKN2B loss were the most frequent alterations in urothelial tumors (present in 38.5% and 30.4% of patients, respectively). Both genes were less frequently altered in adenocarcinomas (15.2% and 8.9%), but commonly altered in squamous cell carcinomas (74.4% and 39%). Tumors of neuroendocrine origin were relatively silent in activating cyclin alterations, but frequently displayed Rb1 alterations (86% and 83.7% of neuroendocrines and small cell carcinomas). Urachal tumors (n = 79) presented a distinct landscape of cyclin alterations relative to other UT cancers, with less frequent alterations overall. FGF/FGFR genes were altered in 34.9% of urothelial (22.1% in FGFR3), and 19.4% of non-urothelial urinary tract tumors (6.8% FGFR3). Cyclin-activating alterations frequently co-occurred with FGF/FGFR alterations but were in general mutually exclusively with cyclin resistance alterations (RB1/CCNE1). CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin pathway activating alterations are common in urinary tract tumors, but frequency varies with histology and tumors sites. Co-occurrence of cyclin and FGFR pathway alterations may inform therapeutic opportunities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular , Ciclinas , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Fatores de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo
3.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 862338, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35531325

RESUMO

Accessibility to next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has enabled the profiling of microbial communities living in distinct habitats. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing is widely used for microbiota profiling with NGS technologies. Since most used NGS platforms generate short reads, sequencing the full-length 16S rRNA gene is impractical. Therefore, choosing which 16S rRNA hypervariable region to sequence is critical in microbiota profiling studies. All nine 16S rRNA hypervariable regions are taxonomically informative, but due to variability in profiling performance for specific clades, choosing the ideal 16S rRNA hypervariable region will depend on the bacterial composition of the habitat under study. Recently, NGS allowed the identification of microbes in the urinary tract, and urinary microbiota has become an active research area. However, there is no current study evaluating the performance of different 16S rRNA hypervariable regions for male urinary microbiota profiling. We collected urine samples from male volunteers and profiled their urinary microbiota by sequencing a panel of six amplicons encompassing all nine 16S rRNA hypervariable regions. Systematic comparisons of their performance indicate V1V2 hypervariable regions better assess the taxa commonly present in male urine samples, suggesting V1V2 amplicon sequencing is more suitable for male urinary microbiota profiling. We believe our results will be helpful to guide this crucial methodological choice in future male urinary microbiota studies.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Bactérias/genética , Primers do DNA/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Microbiota/genética , Filogenia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos
4.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 52(1): 374-380, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33225411

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Over the last decades, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treatment. In late-stage disease, a range of treatment regimens still offers minor benefits. Molecular profiling studies have shown that pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a mutation-driven tumor type, with KRAS mutations found in approximately 90% of cases, which could partially explain the resistance to chemotherapy. Preclinical data on selective targeting of a downstream point of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway with a MEK inhibitor along with the concurrent use of an autophagy inhibitor such as hydroxychloroquine appears to be one alternative approach to overcome resistance and inhibit cell proliferation. METHODS: We herein aim to investigate the rationale of autophagy inhibitors use and describe the outcomes of patients who received this experimental treatment. RESULTS: Two patients have received this experimental regimen from January 2020 to the present date, achieving disease stabilization that is clinically meaningful, considering the chemoresistance scenario of the included patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-life data regarding KRAS-mutated PDAC patients who received treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib combined with hydroxychloroquine after experiencing disease progression are consistent with the preclinical data, pointing to the clinical benefits of this regimen.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamento farmacológico , Hidroxicloroquina/farmacologia , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Autofagia/efeitos dos fármacos , Autofagia/genética , Antígeno CA-19-9/sangue , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/secundário , Progressão da Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases/efeitos dos fármacos , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/metabolismo , Piridonas/farmacologia , Pirimidinonas/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(15): 4020-4026, 2017 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28377482

RESUMO

Purpose: Evaluate the association between the use of phase I expansion cohorts (ECs) and drug performance in phase II as well as time to approval by the FDA.Experimental Design: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE for single-agent dose-finding adult oncology phase I trials published in 2006 to 2011 and subsequent phase II trials. Successful phase II trials were those that met their primary endpoints. Dates of approval were obtained from the Drugs@FDA website in April 2014. A logistic regression model was used to determine the associations between variables and success in phase II.Results: We identified 533 phase I trials evaluating 381 drugs; 112 drugs had at least one phase I trial with an expansion cohort. Phase I trials with expansion cohorts of two to 20 patients were associated with a higher rate of successful phase II trials than those with no expansion cohort [48% vs. 27%; OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.0; P = 0.037]. Phase II success rates were the same for expansion cohort with two to 20 and more than 20 patients (48% vs. 52%). Other positive associations were disease-specific trials (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9; P = 0.037), industry sponsorship (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.7; P = 0.0024), and response rate of 6% to 20% (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.6-5.2; P = 0.0007). Drugs tested in phase I trials with expansion cohorts had a higher rate of 5-year approval (19% vs. 5%; HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.2-8.8; P < 0.001).Conclusions: The use of expansion cohorts in phase I trials was associated with success of subsequent phase II trials. However, confounders may play a role in this association. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4020-6. ©2017 AACR.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto/normas , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Oncologia/normas , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Probabilidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA