Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 35(3): 368-374, 2020 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549108

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The current review evaluates recent literature on the different aspects of prophylaxis in postoperative pulmonary and venous thromboembolism and their main risk factors. METHODS: The literature survey was carried out based on the PubMed data using the keywords "coronary artery bypass graft" and "venous thromboembolism" as components of the search field title. RESULTS: Studies reported several risk factors for postoperative thromboembolism including advanced age, postoperative immobilization, type of thromboprophylaxis, obesity, and location of the surgery. CONCLUSION: According to the studies, tailored prophylaxis could be easily adapted to decrease the intensity and duration of postoperative thromboembolism in a patient with several disorders and comorbidities, especially in cardiovascular disease.


Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;35(3): 368-374, May-June 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1137261

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The current review evaluates recent literature on the different aspects of prophylaxis in postoperative pulmonary and venous thromboembolism and their main risk factors. Methods: The literature survey was carried out based on the PubMed data using the keywords "coronary artery bypass graft" and "venous thromboembolism" as components of the search field title. Results: Studies reported several risk factors for postoperative thromboembolism including advanced age, postoperative immobilization, type of thromboprophylaxis, obesity, and location of the surgery. Conclusion: According to the studies, tailored prophylaxis could be easily adapted to decrease the intensity and duration of postoperative thromboembolism in a patient with several disorders and comorbidities, especially in cardiovascular disease.


Assuntos
Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico
3.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 33(5): 448-453, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30517252

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. METHODS: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). RESULTS: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). CONCLUSION: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/prevenção & controle , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravenosa , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;33(5): 448-453, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-977448

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: Cardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries. Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition. Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia. Methods: In this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576). Results: During the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral groups, respectively (OR: 0.428). Conclusion: Providing 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as a promising and cost-effective method.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Arritmias Cardíacas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/sangue , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Administração Intravenosa , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA