RESUMO
Abstract Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a rare subtype of sarcoidosis with a poor prognosis and diverse clinical presentations that often poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We describe the case of a 53-year-old male with an initial diagnosis of lingual sarcoidosis, who subsequently developed ataxia and rapidly progressive cognitive im pairment. A lumbar puncture revealed hypoglycorrha chia, hyperproteinorrachia, lymphocytic pleocytosis, and elevated IL-6 levels (600 pg/ml). Cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry showed an elevated CD4 lymphocyte con centration and a CD4+/CD8+ ratio of 3.91, indicative of NS. Brain MRI showed hyperintense periventricular and subcortical lesions on FLAIR/T2 resembling progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), although nega tive PCR for JC virus ruled out the differential diagnosis. Following a favorable evolutionary course with cortico steroid pulses, the patient relapsed with normotensive hydrocephalus, treated with immunosuppressants and ventriculoperitoneal shunting with a good response to date. This case underscores the importance of maintain ing a high index of suspicion for NS in individuals with sarcoidosis and neurologic symptoms. In these cases, ce rebrospinal fluid biomarkers such as IL-6 and CD4+/CD8+ ratio are essential to guide the diagnosis. Furthermore, it highlights that hydrocephalus is a rare complication and requires a multidisciplinary approach, including medical and neurosurgical treatment.
Resumen La neurosarcoidosis es un subtipo raro de sarcoidosis con mal pronóstico y diversas presentaciones clínicas que a menudo plantea un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. Describimos el caso de un varón de 53 años con diagnóstico inicial de sarcoidosis lingual, que posterior mente desarrolló ataxia y deterioro cognitivo de rápida evolución. Una punción lumbar reveló hipoglucorraquia, hiperproteinorraquia, pleocitosis linfocítica y niveles elevados de IL-6 (600 pg/ml). La citometría de flujo del líquido cefalorraquídeo mostró una concentración ele vada de linfocitos CD4 y un cociente CD4+/CD8+ de 3.91, indicativo de neurosarcoidosis. La RM cerebral evidenció lesiones hiperintensas periventriculares y subcorticales en FLAIR/T2 que se asemejaban a una leucoencefalopa tía multifocal progresiva (LMP), aunque la PCR negativa para el virus JC descartó el diagnóstico diferencial. Tras un curso evolutivo favorable con pulsos de corticoides, el paciente recayó con hidrocefalia normotensiva, tratada con inmunosupresores y derivación ventriculoperitoneal con buena respuesta hasta la fecha. Este caso subraya la importancia de mantener un alto índice de sospecha de neurosarcoidosis en individuos con sarcoidosis y síntomas neurológicos. En estos casos, los biomarcadores del líquido cefalorraquídeo tales como la IL-6 y el cociente CD4+/CD8+ son esenciales para orientar el diagnóstico. Además, destaca que la hidro cefalia es una complicación poco frecuente y requiere un abordaje multidisciplinario, que incluya tratamiento médico y neuroquirúrgico.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Liver injury after Covid-19 vaccine has been described, although the incidence was not well established. We aimed to compare cumulative incidence of new onset liver test alteration after Covid-19 vaccination, and to compare with an historical control of influenza vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study which included adults who received at least one dose of Covid-19 vaccine from January 1 to May 30, 2021 and a control group who received a single dose of influenza vaccine during 2019, in a tertiary medical center from Argentina. RESULTS: We included 29 798 patients in Covid-19 vaccine group and 24 605 in influenza vaccine group. Liver function tests were performed in 7833 (26.9%) in Covid-19 vaccine group and 8459 (34.37%) in influenza vaccine group. Cumulative incidence at 90 days of new onset liver enzyme test alteration was 4.7 per 1000 (95% 4.0-5.5) for Covid-19 group, and 5.1 per 1000 (95% 4.3-6.1) for the influenza vaccine group (p value = 0.489). Two patients in the Covid-19 vaccine group developed immune mediated liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in liver test alteration between groups. These findings support the safety of Covid-19 vaccines. While we have identified two cases that are consistent with immune mediated liver injury following COVID-19 vaccination, we believe that the available data is insufficient to attribute them solely to the vaccination.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Testes de Função Hepática , Adulto , Humanos , Grupos Controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Resumen Los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario han demostrado mejorar el pronóstico de múltiples enfer medades oncológicas. Recientemente se han reportado eventos adversos relacionados a la inmunoterapia. La to xicidad neurológica es poco frecuente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con encefalitis relacionada con inhibido res del punto de control inmunitario.
Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve the prognosis of multiple oncological diseases. Recently, adverse events related to immunotherapy have been reported. Neurologic toxicity is infrequent. We pre sent the case of a patient with encephalitis associated to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
RESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve the prognosis of multiple oncological diseases. Recently, adverse events related to immunotherapy have been reported. Neurologic toxicity is infrequent. We present the case of a patient with encephalitis associated to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario han demostrado mejorar el pronóstico de múltiples enfermedades oncológicas. Recientemente se han reportado eventos adversos relacionados a la inmunoterapia. La toxicidad neurológica es poco frecuente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con encefalitis relacionada con inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario.
Assuntos
Encefalite , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Encefalite/induzido quimicamente , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Introducción: el síndrome de vena cava superior resulta de la obstrucción del flujo sanguíneo a través de este vaso. Casi la totalidad de los casos en la actualidad se asocian con tumores malignos. Existen controversias acerca del manejo apropiado de este cuadro. Actualmente, las terapias endovasculares son consideradas de elección. Materiales y métodos: se recolectaron y describieron, a partir de datos de la historia clínica electrónica, los casos de pacientes mayores de 18 años internados de forma consecutiva, que desarrollaron el síndrome en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires en 2021. Se constataron las características basales, los tratamientos recibidos y los desenlaces clínicos intrahospitaliarios de cada uno de ellos. Resultados: un total de cinco pacientes fueron incluidos en el presente estudio y seguidos durante su instancia intrahospitalaria. Todos los casos descriptos fueron secundarios a enfermedades oncológicas. La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron un cuadro de moderada gravedad según las escalas utilizadas. En cuatro de cinco pacientes se optó por terapias endovasculares y dos de ellos fallecieron durante la internación. Discusión: existen controversias respecto del tratamiento óptimo del síndrome de vena cava superior, y heterogeneidad en la práctica clínica. Los estudios futuros deberían centrarse en identificar a aquellos pacientes que más probablemente se beneficien de las estrategias terapéuticas endovasculares, anticoagulantes o antiagregantes. (AU)
Introduction: superior vena cava syndrome results from an obstruction of blood flow through this vessel. Currently, almost all cases are associated with malignancies. There are controversies about the optimal management of this syndrome. Endovascular therapies are considered the first-line therapy. Material and methods: we collected clinical, laboratory and pharmacological data from patients admitted at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, between January 1st and November 1st 2021 with a diagnosis o superior vein cava syndrome. Baseline characteristics, treatment strategies and clinical outcomes were recorded. Results: a total of five patients were included in the present study. All cases were malignancy-related. Most of the patientsdeveloped moderate symptoms. Four out of five patients were treated with endovascular therapies and two patients died during hospitalization. Discussion: controversies regarding optimal management of the superior vena cava syndrome remain. Future research should focus on identifying those patients who are most likely to benefit from endovascular, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapeutic strategies. (AU)