RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in interest in the use of biological therapies in orthopaedic conditions such as knee osteoarthritis. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of these therapies, but it still lacks consistent results. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects (benefits and harms) of PRP intra-articular injection compared with other nonsurgical methods for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies published before January 2021. The primary outcomes were pain, function, and failure of treatment. Risks of bias of all trials were assessed using a Cochrane risk of bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System was used to assess the quality of evidence of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies with 3035 participants were included. Analysis of this review focused on comparing PRP with hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, and saline, as we believe they are the most relevant comparisons with the most studies available. At 6-month follow-up, PRP was as effective as and in some studies more effective than other therapies regarding pain, function, and stiffness. However, current evidence is of low or very low quality and is based on trials with high risk of bias and great heterogeneity among them. No significant difference among treatments was found concerning major adverse events and treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Although studies suggest that PRP may be more effective than or at least as effective as other modalities of nonsurgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis in terms of pain, function, and adverse events, serious limitations and methodological flaws are considerable in the current literature. Therefore, the authors are not able to make recommendations for clinical practice regarding PRP for knee osteoarthritis.
Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Joelho , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anterior drawer test, Lachman test including evaluation of the endpoint, and pivot shift test have been commonly applied clinically in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury but how they function in the appraisal of partial ACL tears is less known. The aims of this study were to examine the diagnostic values of the commonly used knee function tests on patients in detecting ACL injury including partial injury patterns, to assess each of the test's predictive values on the specific ACL injury pattern, and to assess if using multiple tests collectively for the diagnosis of the injury could improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We evaluated 36 consecutive patients who underwent ACL single bundle augmentation surgery. Those patients were matched by gender and age to 36 patients with a complete rupture of the ACL. Data was obtained from the patients' records. The rupture pattern was confirmed by arthroscopy. An examination under anesthesia was routinely performed by two surgeons who were blinded to the rupture pattern prior to surgery. RESULTS: Collectively using both Lachman test and pivot shift test increases ability to distinguish between partial tears and complete ruptures. When comparing partial PL tears and complete ruptures the pivot shift test is more important than the Lachman test. In diagnosing a complete rupture, the evaluation of the endpoint during the Lachman test is more sensitive than the evaluation of the anterior tibial translation during the Lachman test. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, a diagnostic algorithm has been implemented and is presented in this manuscript.