RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to inform policy regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in North America. We measured the clinical impact of HPV-6/-11/-16/-18 vaccination in North American women. STUDY DESIGN: The study enrolled 21,954 women, the majority aged 16-25, across 5 studies of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine or its HPV-16 vaccine prototype. The North American subjects (n = 5996) were pooled from these trials, and the prevalence of HPV-6/-11/-16/-18 exposure was measured. The impact of vaccination on the burden of anogenital HPV lesions in an intention-to-treat population (regardless of enrollment HPV status) was calculated. RESULTS: At enrollment, the median age was 20 years; 13% of the women had had a Papanicolaou test abnormality, and 76% of the women had negative tests results for all 4 vaccine HPV types. With approximately 3 years of follow-up evaluations in the intention-to-treat population (regardless of enrollment HPV status), vaccination reduced the rate of HPV-16- and -18-related precancers and HPV-6/-11/-16/-18-related genital lesions by 66.4% (95% CI, 42.7%-81.1%) and 57.7% (95% CI, 27.3%-76.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The administration of HPV vaccine to sexually active North American women reduced the burden of HPV-6/-11/-16/-18-related disease. Catch-up vaccination programs in this population are warranted.
Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/prevenção & controle , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Verrugas/prevenção & controle , Verrugas/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá , Feminino , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18 , Humanos , Porto Rico , Comportamento Sexual , Estados UnidosRESUMO
We examined the potential health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) 6/11/16/18 vaccination strategies in the Mexican population using a multi-HPV type dynamic transmission model. Assuming similar cervical screening practices, with or without vaccination, we examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies for 12 year-old females, with or without male vaccination, and temporary age 12-24 catch-up vaccination for females or both sexes. The most effective strategy therein was vaccination of 12-year-olds, plus a temporary 12-24-year-old catch-up program covering both sexes; whereby HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical cancer, high-grade cervical precancer, and genital wart incidence was reduced by 84-98% during year 50 following vaccine introduction. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in the primary analyses ranged from approximately 3000 dollars (U.S.) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for female vaccination strategies to approximately 16000 dollars /QALY for adding male vaccination with catch-up.
Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in a neonatal screening panel for 14 fatty acid oxidation and organic acidemia disorders in the Wisconsin Newborn Screening Program. STUDY DESIGN: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis with a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 infants was performed. A threshold of $50,000/QALY (quality-adjusted life-year) was used to determine whether screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD) alone is cost-effective or whether additional disorders would need to be incorporated into the analysis to arrive at a conclusion regarding the overall cost-effectiveness of MS/MS. RESULTS: Under conservative assumptions, screening for MCAD alone yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $41,862/QALY. With the use of more realistic assumptions, screening becomes more cost-effective ($6008/QALY) and remains cost-effective so long as the incremental cost of screening remains under $13.05 per test. Adding the incremental costs of detecting the 13 other disorders on the screening panel still yields a result well within accepted norms for cost-effectiveness ($15,252/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: In Wisconsin, MS/MS screening for MCAD alone appears to be cost-effective. Future analyses should examine the cost-effectiveness of alternative follow-up and treatment regimens for MCAD and other panel disorders.