Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(3): 316-20, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22898312

RESUMO

Recent studies have evaluated many methods of internal fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), aiming to increase stability of the bone segments while minimizing condylar displacement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the stability of the fixation comparing a specially designed bone plate to other two commonly used methods. Thirty hemimandibles were separated into three equal groups. All specimens received SSRO. In Group I the osteotomies were fixed with three 15 mm bicortical positional screws in an inverted-L pattern with an insertion angle of 90°. In Group II, fixation was carried out with a four-hole straight plate and four 6mm monocortical screws. In Group III, fixation was performed with an adjustable sagittal plate and eight 6mm monocortical screws. Hemimandibles were submitted to vertical compressive loads, by a mechanical testing unit. Averages and standard deviations were submitted to analysis of variance using the Tukey test with a 5% level of significance. Bicortical screws presented the greatest values of loading resistance. The adjustable miniplate demonstrated 60% lower resistance compared to bicortical screws. Group II presented on average 40% less resistant to the axial loading.


Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Técnicas de Fixação da Arcada Osseodentária/instrumentação , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular/métodos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Força Compressiva , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Humanos , Modelos Anatômicos , Osteotomia Sagital do Ramo Mandibular/instrumentação , Poliuretanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA