RESUMO
Objective: The Diabetes Device Confidence Scale (DDCS) is a new scale designed to evaluate school nurse confidence with diabetes devices. We hypothesized that DDCS score would be associated with related constructs of school nurse diabetes knowledge, experience, and training. Research Design and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we co-administered the DDCS and Diabetes Knowledge Test 2 (DKT2) questionnaires to school nurses in Pennsylvania. We summarized DDCS scores (range 1-5) descriptively. We evaluated the relationship between DKT2 percent score and DDCS mean score with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Simple linear regression examined school nurse characteristics as predictors of DDCS score. Results: A total of 271 completed surveys were received. Mean DDCS score was 3.16±0.94, indicating moderate confidence with devices overall. School nurses frequently reported low confidence in items representing specific skills, including suspending insulin delivery (40%), giving a manual bolus (42%), knowing when to calibrate a continuous glucose monitor (48%), changing an insulin pump site (54%), and setting a temporary basal rate (58%). Mean DKT2 score was 89.5±0.1%, which was weakly but not significantly correlated with DDCS score (r=0.12, p=0.06). Formal device training (p<0.001), assisting ≥5 students with diabetes devices in the past 5 years (p<0.01), and a student caseload between 1000-1500 students (p<0.001) were associated with higher mean DDCS score. Conclusions: DDCS score is related to prior training and experience, providing evidence for the scale's convergent validity. The DDCS may be a useful tool for assessing school nurse readiness to use devices and identify areas to enhance knowledge and practical skills.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Insulina , Inquéritos e Questionários , EstudantesRESUMO
In response to growing evidence of associations between harmful masculinities and adverse health outcomes, researchers developed the Man Box Scale to provide a standardized measure to assess these inequitable gender attitudes. In 2019, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the 17-item Man Box Scale and derived a 5-item short form. Using previously collected data (in 2016) from men aged 18-30 years across the United States (n = 1328), the United Kingdom (n = 1225), and Mexico (n = 1120), we conducted exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), assessed convergent validity by examining associations of the standardized mean Man Box Scale score with violence perpetration, depression, and suicidal ideation, and assessed internal consistency reliability of the full scale. We used item response theory (IRT) to derive a 5-item short form, and conducted CFA and additional assessments for reliability and convergent validity. We identified a single underlying factor with 15 items across all three countries. CFA resulted in good model fit. We demonstrated significant associations of standardized mean Man Box Scale score with violence perpetration (OR range = 1.57-5.49), depression (OR range = 1.19-1.73), and suicidal ideation (OR range = 1.56-2.59). IRT resulted in a 5-item short form with good fit through CFA and convergent validity, and good internal consistency. The Man Box Scale assesses harmful masculinities and demonstrates strong validity and reliability across three diverse countries. This scale, either short or long forms, can be used in future prevention research, clinical assessment and decision-making, and intervention evaluations.
Assuntos
Psicometria , Análise Fatorial , Humanos , Masculino , México , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although rare, pseudoaneurysms (PA) can develop following Le Fort I osteotomy and lead to life-threatening hemorrhage. However, the typical presentation of a PA following a Le Fort I osteotomy is not well characterized. Evidence-based guidelines are not currently available for evaluation of PA following Le Fort I osteotomy. METHODS: A case report is presented of a 27-year-old man who underwent Le Fort I advancement and subsequently developed a bleeding PA. A comprehensive search of journal articles was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database between 1964 and April 2016. Keywords and phrases used were "(osteotomy OR craniofacial OR orthognathic) AND (pseudoaneurysm OR aneurysm OR epistaxis)." Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 13 reports of 18 patients. All 18 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and subsequently developed a delayed postoperative bleeding PA. All studies were level IV or V evidence. Twenty-eight percent (Nâ=â5) of the cases documented "excessive" intraoperative bleeding or more than 500âmL of estimated blood loss. The average time for the first bleeding episode and time until final bleed was 17.3â±â14.3 days (range: 3-62 days) and 27.8â±â21.2 days following surgery (range: 6-77 days), respectively. Sixty-seven percent (Nâ=â12) had multiple episodes of bleeding. The duration between the bleeding events averaged 10.6â(± 7.9 days) with a range of 1 to 35 days. Bleeding PA's were treated with image-guided embolization (15/18 patients; 83.3%) or ligation or clamping (3/18 patients; 16.7%). CONCLUSION: In the setting of recurrent and/or delayed postoperative epistaxis following Le Fort I osteotomy, surgeons should maintain a high clinical suspicion for PA. Ruptured PA's are often preceded by multiple episodes of progressively worsening epistaxis. Based on the presented case report and pooled data from the literature, angiography is recommended to evaluate for PA in the setting of recurrent epistaxis following Le Fort I osteotomy, especially within the first 4 weeks following surgery.