RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The key endpoints for the assessment of the effect of maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are survival and quality-of-life outcomes. We aimed to compare dermatology-related quality of life (DRQOL) in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) + panitumumab (Pmab) versus FU/FA alone as maintenance therapy after folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin + Pmab induction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212; NCT01991873) trial included 387 patients at 70 community/academic sites in Germany. For this prespecified secondary analysis, DRQOL outcomes were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (FACT-EGFRI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Skindex-16 questionnaires at every second cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. RESULTS: At least one DRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 310/377 (82%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 216/248 (87%) patients who were randomized and received maintenance therapy. Patients who experienced skin toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) during induction therapy had significantly worse DRQOL according to all three measures, compared to those who did not [i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 2 -12.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.01 to -5.73; P < 0.001]. During maintenance therapy, significantly improved recovery was observed in all DRQOL measures for patients receiving FU/FA, compared to those receiving additional Pmab (i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 6 -16.53; 95% CI -22.68 to -10.38; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of a phase II randomized clinical trial, patient-reported DRQOL outcomes correlated with skin toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE during induction therapy. Maintenance therapy with FU/FA + Pmab was associated with deteriorated DRQOL versus FU/FA alone in patients with RAS wt mCRC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Colorretais , Fluoruracila , Leucovorina , Panitumumabe , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/farmacologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/farmacologia , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Panitumumabe/uso terapêutico , Panitumumabe/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organoplatínicos/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are usually conducted irrespective of sex. Sex-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, however, are gaining interest. METHODS: PanaMa investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. In this post hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for sex. Evaluated efficacy endpoints during maintenance treatment were progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint of the trial), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy. RESULTS: In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male and female patients showed numerically better objective response rates with Pmab, without reaching statistical significance. Male patients derived a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006] that was not observed in female patients (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35; P = 0.491). The better PFS for male patients treated with Pmab did not translate into improved OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.55-1.30; P = 0.452). Female patients showed numerically improved OS when treated with Pmab. There was no difference in the total of grade ≥3 adverse events during maintenance regarding sex (P = 0.791). Female patients, however, had a higher rate of any grade nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the PanaMa trial, the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC with FU/FA improved the outcome in terms of the primary endpoint (PFS) particularly in male patients. Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events. Our results support the development of sex-specific protocols.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Panitumumabe/farmacologia , Panitumumabe/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed on generating insight on alterations in circulating immune cells during the use of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated before and 30 days after initiation of chemotherapy from 20 patients with advanced PDAC. Regulatory T cells (FoxP3+) and immune checkpoints (PD-1 and TIM-3) were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunological changes were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Heterogeneous changes during chemotherapy were observed in circulating T-cell subpopulations with a pronounced effect on PD-1+ CD4+/CD8+ T cells. An increase in FoxP3+ or PD-1+ T cells had no significant effect on survival. An increase in TIM3+/CD8+ (but not TIM3+/CD4+) T cells was associated with a significant inferior outcome: median progression-free survival in the subgroup with an increase of TIM-3+/CD8+ T cells was 6.0 compared to 14.0 months in patients with a decrease/no change (p = 0.026); corresponding median overall survival was 13.0 and 20.0 months (p = 0.011), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with FOLFIRNOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel induces variable changes in circulating T-cell populations that may provide prognostic information in PDAC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos T Reguladores/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/química , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/química , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/efeitos dos fármacos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/imunologia , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Transcrição Forkhead , Receptor Celular 2 do Vírus da Hepatite A/análise , Humanos , Proteínas de Checkpoint Imunológico/análise , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/imunologia , Projetos Piloto , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/análise , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/efeitos dos fármacos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Prospectivos , Linfócitos T Reguladores/química , GencitabinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neuronal signaling has been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple malignancies. In biliary tract cancers (BTCs), tumor cell expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its receptor neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) has been reported in Asian patients and linked to inferior clinical outcome. Furthermore, NTRK fusions have emerged as a promising target in various cancers. Expression patterns of these markers in Caucasian patients remain unknown. METHODS: In this study, 106 patients with BTCs were included. Immunohistochemistry for pan-NTRK and NGF-beta was performed on > 90 samples of this cohort. Additionally, samples from two independent cohorts, incorporating 254 cases, were used to confirm the findings of the original cohort. RESULTS: While expression of pan-NTRK and NGF-beta was readily detectable in peri-tumoral nerves, these markers were not detectable in malignant epithelial cells in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of Caucasian patients with BTC, NTRK and NGF-beta were not detectable, underscoring potential differences between Caucasian and Asian patient populations.