Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pancreas ; 38(2): e33-42, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19136908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: There are currently no diagnostic indicators that are consistently reliable, obtainable, and conclusive for diagnosing and risk-stratifying pancreatic cysts. Proteomic analyses were performed to explore pancreatic cyst fluids to yield effective diagnostic biomarkers. METHODS: We have prospectively recruited 20 research participants and prepared their pancreatic cyst fluids specifically for proteomic analyses. Proteomic approaches applied were as follows: (1) matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry peptidomics with LC/MS/MS (HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry) protein identification; (2) 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis; (3) GeLC/MS/MS (tryptic digestion of proteins fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and identified by LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: Sequencing of more than 350 free peptides showed that exopeptidase activities rendered peptidomics of cyst fluids unreliable; protein nicking by proteases in the cyst fluids produced hundreds of protein spots from the major proteins, making 2-dimensional gel proteomics unmanageable; GeLC/MS/MS revealed a panel of potential biomarker proteins that correlated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CONCLUSIONS: Two homologs of amylase, solubilized molecules of 4 mucins, 4 solubilized CEA-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs), and 4 S100 homologs may be candidate biomarkers to facilitate future pancreatic cyst diagnosis and risk-stratification. This approach required less than 40 microL of cyst fluid per sample, offering the possibility to analyze cysts smaller than 1 cm in diameter.


Assuntos
Líquido Cístico/química , Cisto Pancreático/metabolismo , Proteômica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amilases/análise , Antígeno Carcinoembrionário/análise , Cromatografia Líquida , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucinas/análise , Estudos Prospectivos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 61(4): 1123-8, 2005 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15752892

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Accurate delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is important in radiation therapy treatment planning. We evaluated the impact of PET and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) compared with CT simulation in the planning of radiation fields for patients with esophageal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients presenting with esophageal carcinoma for radiation therapy underwent PET scans in the treatment position after conventional CT simulation. Patients underwent PET/CT scanning after being injected with 10 to 20 mCi of [F-18]-2-deoxy-2-fluro-D-glucose. The length of the abnormality seen on the CT portion of the PET/CT scan vs. the PET scan alone was determined independently by 2 separate investigators. The length of the GTV and detection of regional adenopathy by PET was also correlated with EUS in 18 patients. Of the 18 patients who had EUS, 2 had T2 tumors and 16 had T3 tumors. Eighteen patients had adenocarcinoma and 7 had squamous cell carcinoma. Nine tumors were located at the gastroesophageal junction, 8 at the lower esophagus, 7 in the middle esophagus, and 1 in the cervical esophagus. The PET scans were reviewed to determine the length of the abnormality by use of a standard uptake value (SUV) of 2.5 to delineate the tumor extent. RESULTS: The mean length of the cancer was 5.4 cm (95% CI 4.4-6.4 cm) as determined by PET scan, 6.77 cm (95% CI, 5.6-7.9 cm) as determined by CT scan, and 5.1 cm (95% CI, 4.0-6.1 cm) for the 22 patients who had endoscopy. The length of the tumors was significantly longer as measured by CT scans compared with PET scans (p = 0.0063). EUS detected significantly more patients with periesophageal and celiac lymphadenopathy compared to PET and CT. The SUV of the esophageal tumors was higher in patients with peri-esophageal lymphadenopathy identified on PET scans. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound and PET scans can add additional information to aid the radiation oncologist's ability to precisely identify the GTV in patients with esophageal carcinoma.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/ultraestrutura , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Esofagoscopia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA