RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Axillary lymphadenectomy is nowadays not recommended to treat ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), but there is controversy surrounding the indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of a selected group of patients diagnosed preoperatively with DCIS was performed between 2004 and 2009. Indications for SLNB were histologically determined high-grade tumours, tumour size >2 cm and patients scheduled to undergo a mastectomy. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were analysed. Surgical technique was mastectomy in 39 patients (60%) and conservative breast surgery in 26 (40%). Definitive histological study of the resected breast tumour revealed 43 cases (66.2%) of DCIS, 15 (23.1%) of ductal invasive carcinoma and seven (10.7%) microinvasive tumours. In confirmed DCIS, only 6.9% of sentinel lymph nodes were positive, in microinvasive carcinoma 28.5% and in invasive carcinoma 40% were positive. Total number of patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes was 11 (16.9%). Of 39 mastectomies, 12 corresponded to microinvasive or invasive carcinoma and six (50%) showed a positive SLNB. CONCLUSIONS: Performing SLNB avoids an unnecessary second surgery to study axillary lymph nodes in invasive carcinoma diagnosed after definitive histological study. In patients undergoing a mastectomy, this study requires an axillary lymphadenectomy that is not useful in up to 50% of cases. We think that in a selected group of patients with DCIS, SLNB improves tumour staging, adapts the treatment and avoids second surgery in this group of patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The great heterogeneity of breast cancer makes it impossible to firmly predict which patients with early-stage tumours will or will not need systemic treatments according to the conventional prognostic factors currently employed. In fact, a substantial percentage of patients receive medical treatment for a disease that will not relapse, while another proportion of patients regarded as having good prognostic factors according to the classic criteria do not receive treatment and suffer disease relapse. Considering that most oncological treatments have short- and long-term toxic effects, new methods capable of offering a more precise prognosis need to be developed. The individualisation of the diagnosis of patients with breast cancer based on molecular and gene expression studies is bringing about a veritable revolution in our understanding of the biology of the disease. The new molecular classification of breast cancer, based on these profiles, allows us to establish a prognosis according to the genetic characteristics of each tumour. Such individualisation of the diagnosis of patients with breast cancer will lead to the application of more specific treatments, thereby improving patient survival with lesser toxicity and increased economic savings. Of the different genetic analytical tests available, MammaPrint has been shown to be the option offering the most information on the behaviour of early breast cancer; as a result, it is the most useful technique in deciding the need for oncological treatment as a complement to surgery.