RESUMO

Introducción: La revascularización mediante intervención coronaria percutánea con colocación de stent, o cirugía de derivación coronaria, alivia la isquemia miocárdica. Sin embargo, las pruebas de estrés no invasivas y la angiografía coronaria no siempre proporcionan la información adecuada sobre la importancia funcional de las estenosis en las arterias coronarias. Objetivo: Describir las recomendaciones actuales de la literatura médica con respecto a la fisiología coronaria en la cardiopatía isquémica. Desarrollo: El índice de reserva fraccional de flujo se considera el estándar de oro para detectar la isquemia miocárdica. Su naturaleza invasiva se equilibra con la resolución espacial inigualable y su relación lineal con el flujo sanguíneo máximo. Los resultados clínicos de pacientes cuya estrategia de revascularización se basa en mediciones de reserva fraccional de flujo son decisivos en varios subconjuntos de diferentes lesiones. En la última década se ha propuesto la evaluación de la gravedad de la estenosis coronaria mediante índices no hiperémicos. Sin embargo, la precisión de estos índices para distinguir correctamente la isquemia miocárdica es solo del 80 %. Conclusiones: Actualmente, la hiperemia máxima se recomienda para una óptima toma de decisiones sobre la revascularización.

Introduction: Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting, or coronary bypass surgery, alleviates myocardial ischemia. However, noninvasive stress testing and angiography do not always provide adequate information on the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Objective: To describe the recommendations of the medical literature regarding coronary physiology in ischemic heart disease. Development: The fractional flow reserve index is considered the gold standard for detecting myocardial ischemia. Its invasive nature is balanced by unmatched spatial resolution and its linear relationship to peak blood flow. The clinical outcomes of patients whose revascularization strategy is based on fractional flow reserve measurements are decisive in several subsets of other lesions. In the last decade, assessment of coronary stenosis severity by non-hyperemic indices has been proposed; however, the accuracy of these indices to correctly distinguish myocardial ischemia does not exceed 80%. Conclusions: Currently, maximal hyperemia is recommended for optimal revascularization decision making.

RESUMO

Objectives: Due to the limited distensibility of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbablevascular scaffold (ABSORB) compared to metallic platform stents, quantitative coronaryarteriography (QCA) is a mandatory requirement for ABSORB deployment in theon-going ABSORB EXTEND Single-Arm Study. Visual assessment of vessel size in theABSORB Cohort B study often lead to under and over-sizing of the 3 mm ABSORB incoronary vessels (recommended range of the vessel diameter 2.5 mm and 3.3 mm),with an increased risk of spontaneous incomplete scaffold apposition post ABSORBdeployment. We report whether mandatory QCA assessment of vessel size pre-implantation,utilizing the maximal luminal diameter (Dmax) and established interpolatedreference vessel diameter (RVD) measurements, has improved device/vessel sizing.Methods: Pre-implantation post-hoc QCA analyses of all 101 patients from ABSORBCohort B (102 lesions) and first consecutive 101 patients (108 lesions) from ABSORBEXTEND were undertaken by an independent core-laboratory; all patients had a 3 mmABSORB implanted. Comparative analyses were performed. Results: Within ABSORBCohort B, a greater number of over-sized vessels (>3.3 mm) were identified utilizingthe Dmax compared to the interpolated RVD (17 vessels, 16.7% vs. 3 vessels, 2.9%; P 50.002). Comparative analyses demonstrated a greater number of appropriate vessel-sizeselection (75 vessels, 69.4% vs. 48 vessels, 47.1%; P 5 0.001), a trend towards a reductionin implantation in small (3.3 mm) vessels(4 vessels, 3.7% vs. 17 vessels, 16.7%; P 5 0.002) in ABSORB EXTEND. Bland–Altmanplots suggested a good agreement between operator and core-laboratory calculatedDmax measurements. Conclusions: ...

Assuntos