Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brachytherapy ; 18(4): 503-509, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126857

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Per American Brachytherapy Society guidelines, cT1-2N0 penile cancers <4 cm in diameter are excellent candidates for curative brachytherapy. Using that criterion, we evaluated national patterns of care and predictors of use of radiation techniques using the National Cancer Database. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was queried for men with cT1-2N0 penile cancers <4 cm in size. Comparative statistics for treatment modality were generated using bivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 1235 cases eligible for analysis, median age was 69 years. Median tumor size was 2.0 cm. 95.8% of men underwent surgery alone, with 91 (7.4%) undergoing radical penectomy, 673 (54.5%) partial penectomy, and 419 (33.9%) cosmesis-preserving surgical procedure. Only 4 (0.3%) men were treated with brachytherapy alone, 48 (3.9%) with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 8 (0.6%) with EBRT after surgery. Surgical margins were positive in 118 (9.6%) patients, 14 of whom received adjuvant EBRT (11.9%) and two adjuvant brachytherapy (1.7%). There was no difference in demographic or clinical characteristics in groups treated with surgery vs. radiation (all p > 0.2). Age >70, lesions >2 cm, and T2 tumors were more likely to undergo non-organ-preserving therapy vs. radiation or a cosmesis-preserving procedure (all p < 0.05). The propensity-matched 5-year survival was not different between definitive radiation vs. surgery (61.6% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Men with penile-preserving eligible lesions in the United States are overwhelmingly treated with surgery. Penile-preserving radiation techniques including brachytherapy and EBRT are underutilized and should be offered as curative interventions.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Penianas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Penianas/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos
2.
Brachytherapy ; 17(3): 564-570, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29426745

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) alone has been shown to be a viable adjuvant treatment strategy for most patients with Stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer. We sought to examine our institutional data following practice pattern changes resulting from the publications of GOG-99 and PORTEC-2. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent adjuvant VBT after surgical staging for Stage 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer at our institution from 2007 to 2014. RESULTS: We identified 297 women. Median time to last followup or death was 52.3 months (interquartile range: 32.3-72.3 months). By International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging, 162 patients (54.5%) had Stage IA and 128 (43.1%) had Stage IB disease. Ninety-nine (33.3%) patients had Grade 1, 153 (51.5%) had Grade 2, and 45 (15.2%) had Grade 3 disease. According to GOG-249 and PORTEC-2 criteria, 167 (56.2%) and 127 (42.7%) patients were with high-intermediate-risk disease. Two women had Stage IB Grade 3 disease. The most common high-dose-rate-VBT regimen was 2100 cGy/three fractions to a depth of 5 mm. Four (two acute and two late) (1.3%) Grade 3 genitourinary toxicities were reported: three episodes of vaginal dehiscence (after second course of VBT, 2 months after completion of VBT, and 1 year after completion of VBT) and one episode of radiation necrosis. Twenty-one (7%) women recurred: three recurred in the vagina, two recurred in the pelvic lymph nodes, and 16 recurred distantly. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes appear consistent with published randomized data in women with high-intermediate-risk endometrial cancer who are treated with brachytherapy alone. Recurrence and complication rates were minimal.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Endometrioide/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/radioterapia , Vagina/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Brachytherapy ; 16(5): 964-967, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28694115

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In image-based brachytherapy (IBBT), the dosimetry of small structures may be particularly sensitive to changes in contouring between imaging modalities. We therefore sought to characterize differences in urethral dosimetry in vaginal brachytherapy based on contouring on MRI vs. CT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified our most recent 15 patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy for distal vaginal malignancies. On T2-weighted MRI, both the lumen and urethral wall were contoured. On CT, the urethral lumen alone was contoured, as the wall is indistinguishable from surrounding tissue. High-dose-rate (HDR) IBBT plans were generated for all patients. RESULTS: Mean urethral volume was higher on MRI than CT at 3.7 cc vs. 1.1 cc (p < 0.0005). As a result, there were statistically significant increases on MRI in D0.1cc and D0.5cc, as well as EQD2 D0.1cc and EQD2 D0.5cc when applied to a full course of treatment (45 Gy EBRT + 25 Gy IBBT). CONCLUSIONS: We have quantified the expected differences in urethral volume and dosimetry when contoured on MRI vs. CT. Inclusion of the urethral wall on MRI, with its average thickness of 2.2 mm, likely more accurately reflects the true organ at risk and results in an increase in reported dose compared to CT.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Uretra/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Vaginais/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Órgãos em Risco/patologia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Doses de Radiação , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radiometria/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/patologia , Neoplasias Vaginais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vaginais/patologia
4.
Brachytherapy ; 14(6): 913-8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26412618

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Multichannel vaginal cylinder brachytherapy (MCVCB) has the potential to sculpt dose distribution, although this is typically reserved for lesions <5-mm thick. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric consequences of treating lesions with MCVCB of varying locations, ≥5 mm in thickness. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients previously treated with MCVCB were randomly selected to each fill one of six categories based on location (lateral, anterior, or vaginal cuff and/or apex) and size of cylinder (2.5 or 3.0 cm). Based on magnetic resonance image, each patient's target lesion was extended circumferentially into theoretical high-risk clinical target volumes measuring 5, 7, and 10 mm in thickness. Image-based brachytherapy treatment plans for each of the six patients' three target volumes were generated. Total 2 Gy per fraction equivalent dosages (EQD2) were calculated using an external beam radiation therapy dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions in conjunction with a high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose of 25 Gy in five fractions. RESULTS: Maximum EQD2 vaginal surface doses in gray for 5-, 7-, and 10-mm targets were as follows (location-cylinder size): lateral-3.0 cm: 122/153/210, lateral-2.5 cm: 145/195/301, anterior-3.0 cm: 115/135/197, anterior-2.5 cm: 132/173/283, apex-3.0 cm: 173/241/367, and apex-2.5 cm: 349/461/706. Total rectal EQD2 D 2 cc ranged from 53.9 to 67.2 Gy. Total bladder EQD2 D 2 cc ranged from 51.5 to 71.2 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal surface dose seems to be the dose-limiting structure for anterior, lateral, and apical vaginal lesions. Caution should be taken when treating lesions >5 mm in depth, with particular attention to vaginal surface dose, especially for apical lesions and with smaller cylinders. In such cases, interstitial brachytherapy should be given strong consideration.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Órgãos em Risco , Doses de Radiação , Vagina/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Vaginais/radioterapia , Carcinoma/patologia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Mucosa/efeitos da radiação , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga Tumoral , Bexiga Urinária , Neoplasias Vaginais/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA