RESUMO
ABSTRACT Gallesia integrifolia (Phytolaccaceae) is native to Brazil and has a strong alliaceous odor. The objective of this study was to identify the chemical composition of G. integrifolia fruit essential oil and evaluate fungicidal activity against the main food-borne diseases and food spoilage fungi. The essential oil was extracted by hydrodistillation and identified by GC-MS. From 35 identified compounds, 68% belonged to the organosulfur class. The major compounds were dimethyl trisulfide (15.49%), 2,8-dithianonane (52.63%) and lenthionine (14.69%). The utilized fungi were Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus versicolor, Penicillium funiculosum, Penicillium ochrochloron, Penicillium verrucosum var. cyclopium, and Trichoderma viride. Minimal fungicidal concentration for the essential oil varied from 0.02 to 0.18 mg/mL and bifonazole and ketoconazole controls ranged from 0.20 to 3.50 mg/mL. The lower concentration of the essential oil was able to control P. ochrochloron, A. fumigatus, A. versicolor, A. ochraceus and T. viride. This study shows a high fungicidal activity of G. integrifolia fruit essential oil and can support future applications by reducing the use of synthetic fungicides.
Assuntos
Óleos de Plantas/farmacologia , Óleos Voláteis/farmacologia , Phytolaccaceae/química , Fungicidas Industriais/farmacologia , Penicillium/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Penicillium/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Aspergillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Óleos de Plantas/química , Brasil , Óleos Voláteis/química , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Frutas/química , Fungicidas Industriais/química , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de MassasRESUMO
Objective: To check and compare the retention of cast posts cemented with three different kinds of cement. Method: Forty five 45 human permanent maxillary incisors were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth. Root canals were prepared for the cast posts up to 8.5mm in length. The cast post obtained randomly were cemented with the help of the three cements (Zinc Phosphate, Glass-ionomer and resin modified Glass-ionomer [hybrid] cement). After cementation, the samples were stored in a physiological solution for seven days, after which we concluded the measure of retentive strength with the help of the universal testing machine (Zwick num. 112627, Ulm-Germany). Results: The hybrid cement has the greatest means value for retention and it is 312.90 N. It is followed by the Glass-ionomer cement with 272.40 N, while the Zinc Phosphate has the least, at 312.90 N. The statistical analysis shows that there is a statistical difference in the retention strength between the Zinc Phosphate cement and the Glass-ionomer (p<0.01), between the Zinc Phosphate cement and the hybrid cement (p<0.01). Conclusion: A significant statistical discrepancy was not manifested between the Glass-ionomer cement and the hybrid cement even though the difference in retention strength for these two cements was around 40 N.
Objetivo: Verificar e comparar a retenção de pinos fundidos cimentados com três diferentes tipos de cimento. Método: Quarenta e cinco incisivos superiores permanentes humanos foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos de 15 dentes cada um. Os canais radiculares foram preparados para receberem pinos fundidos de até 8.5 mm de comprimento. Os pinos foram cimentados com um dos três tipos de cimentos a seguir: cimento de fosfato de zinco, cimento de ionômero de vidro e cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (híbrido). Após a cimentação, as amostras foram armazenadas em solução salina durante 7 dias e então submeti das à análise da força de retenção em máquina universal de ensaios (Zwick num. 112627, Ulm-Germany). Resultados: O cimento híbrido apresentou o maior valor médio de retenção (312.90 N), seguido do cimento de ionômero de vidro (272.40 N) e do cimento de fosfato de zinco (312.90 N). A análise estatística mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante nos valores de retenção entre o cimento de fosfato de zinco e o cimento de ionômero de vidro (p<0,01), e entre o cimento de fosfato de zinco e o cimento híbrido (p<0,01). Conclusão: Não houve discrepância significativa entre o cimento de ionômero de vidro e o cimento híbrido, embora a diferença na força de retenção entre os dois materiais tenha sido de aproximadamente 40 N.