RESUMO

RESUMEN Antecedentes: la falta de pene causa trastornos físicos y psicológicos graves. Su reconstrucción es compleja porque comprende restituir aspectos morfológicos y funcionales. El colgajo radial microquirúrgico (CRM) es una de las mejores opciones para la reconstrucción fálica (RF). Objetivo: describir los resultados de una serie de pacientes con RF mediante CRM. Material y métodos: trabajo observacional descriptivo a través de la revisión de los registros de pacientes a quienes se les realizó RF con CRM entre julio de 2014 y julio de 2017, no relacionados con disforia de género. Resultados: tres pacientes, de 27, 36 y 22 años, fueron reconstruidos, respectivamente, por amputación traumática, secuela de tratamiento oncológico y por malformación congénita. No se presentaron necrosis de los colgajos. La sensibilidad somática fue efectiva en los tres casos y la erógena en uno. Todos los pacientes refirieron satisfacción general con el procedimiento. Conclusión: el CRM, realizado por un equipo multidisciplinario, permitió una RF satisfactoria. La reconstrucción de la uretra debe ser decidida

ABSTRACT Background: The absence of the penis causes serious physical limitations and psychosocial distress. Phallic reconstruction (PR) is a complex procedure because it involves the restoration of morphological and functional aspects. The radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the best options for PR. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the results of a series of patients undergoing PR using RFF. Material and methods: We conducted a descriptive observational study by reviewing the records of patients who underwent PR with RFF not related to gender dysphoria between July 2014 and July 2017. Results: Three patients aged 27, 36, and 22 years underwent reconstruction for traumatic amputation, oncologic treatment sequelae, and congenital defect, respectively. None of the patients developed flap necrosis. Somatic sensation was effective in all three cases and erogenous sensation in one. All patients reported overall satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusion: The use of RFF for PR by a multidisciplinary team produced satisfactory and uncomplicated results. Urethral reconstruction should be decided depending on each patient.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the present study, we aim to provide more evidence about benefits of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). Our main objective is to assess prostatic-specific antigen control and postoperative urinary incontinence in open and robotic approaches as primary outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After the Institutional Review Board approval (IRB00010193), we retrospectively analyzed 76 consecutive patients who underwent open or robot-assisted SRP for locally relapsed prostate cancer between 2004 and 2019 at the Urology Department of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Data were collected from our electronic medical record and prospective database.Postoperative variables, such as urinary incontinence, erectile function preservation, and vesicourethral anastomosis stricture development, were analyzed. RESULTS: Before SRP, 59 patients (76.6%) were treated with 3D external beam radiotherapy, 11 (14.3%) with brachytherapy, and 6 (7.8%) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Fifty patients underwent open SRP, and 26, robot-assisted SRP. Comparing surgical approaches, the global incontinence rate was 34.2% versus 9.1% in open versus robot-assisted approach, respectively (p: 0.01).Vesicourethral anastomosis stricture occurred in six patients (8.7%), all in the open approach group (p: 0.07). Five patients of 69 (7.2%) preserved erectile function with/without use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Two patients in the open approach group needed blood transfusion. Estimated 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate in the open approach group and robot-assisted group was 67% (95% confidence interval: 53.7-80.3) and 60.9% (95% confidence interval: 40.5-81.3), respectively, with no statistical difference (log-rank test p: 0.873). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted SRP is a reliable procedure to treat local recurrences after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, reducing the risk of anastomotic strictures and blood loss and improving continence outcomes.