RESUMO
Background: Many attempts have been made to abbreviate mindfulness programmes in order to make them more accessible for general and clinical populations while maintaining their therapeutic components and efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of an 8-week mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) programme and a 4-week abbreviated version for the improvement of well-being in a non-clinical population. Method: A quasi-experimental, controlled, pilot study was conducted with pre-post and 6-month follow-up measurements and three study conditions (8- and 4-session MBI programmes and a matched no-treatment control group, with a sample of 48, 46, and 47 participants in each condition, respectively). Undergraduate students were recruited, and mindfulness, positive and negative affect, self-compassion, resilience, anxiety, and depression were assessed. Mixed-effects multi-level analyses for repeated measures were performed. Results: The intervention groups showed significant improvements compared to controls in mindfulness and positive affect at the 2- and 6-month follow-ups, with no differences between 8- vs. 4-session programmes. The only difference between the abbreviated MBI vs. the standard MBI was found in self-kindness at 6 months, favoring the standard MBI. There were marginal differences in anxiety between the controls vs. the abbreviated MBI, but there were differences between the controls vs. the standard MBI at 2- and 6-months, with higher levels in the controls. There were no differences in depression between the controls vs. the abbreviated MBI, but differences were found between the controls vs. the standard MBI at 2- and 6-months, favoring the standard MBI. There were no differences with regard to negative affect and resilience. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly investigate the efficacy of a standard 8-week MBI and a 4-week abbreviated protocol in the same population. Based on our findings, both programmes performed better than controls, with similar effect size (ES). The efficacy of abbreviated mindfulness programmes may be similar to that of a standard MBI programme, making them potentially more accessible for a larger number of populations. Nevertheless, further studies with more powerful designs to compare the non-inferiority of the abbreviated protocol and addressing clinical populations are warranted. Clinical Trials.gov Registration ID: NCT02643927.
RESUMO
En la actualidad se conocen 8.000 enfermedades genéticas monogénicas. La mayoría de ellas son heterogéneas, por lo que el diagnóstico molecular por técnicas convencionales de secuenciación suele ser largo y costoso debido al gran número de genes implicados. El tiempo estimado para el diagnóstico molecular se encuentra entre 1 y 10 años, y este retraso impide que los pacientes reciban medidas terapéuticas y de rehabilitación específicas, que sus familiares entren en programas preventivos y que reciban asesoramiento genético. La secuenciación masiva está cambiando el modelo de diagnóstico molecular de los afectos, sin embargo, los médicos y profesionales de la salud se enfrentan al dilema de la selección del método más eficiente, con el menor coste sanitario y con la mayor precisión de sus resultados. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar la tecnología de secuenciación masiva y definir las ventajas y los problemas en su utilización.
Currently 8000 monogenic genetic diseases are known. Most of them are heterogeneous, so their molecular diagnosis by conventional sequencing techniques is labour intensive and time consuming due to the large number of genes involved. The estimated time is between 1 and 10 years for molecular diagnosis and this delay prevents patients from receiving therapy and rehabilitation measures, and their families from entering prevention programs and being given genetic counselling. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is changing the model of molecular diagnosis of patients; however, doctors and health professionals are faced with the dilemma of choosing the most efficient method, with lower health care costs and the most accurate results. The aim of this paper is to review the NGS technology and define the advantages and problems in the use of this technology.