RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although germ-free mice are an indispensable tool in studying the gut microbiome and its effects on host physiology, they are phenotypically different than their conventional counterparts. While antibiotic-mediated microbiota depletion in conventional mice leads to physiologic alterations that often mimic the germ-free state, the degree to which the effects of microbial colonization on the host are reversible is unclear. The gut microbiota produce abundant short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and previous studies have demonstrated a link between microbial-derived SCFAs and global hepatic histone acetylation in germ-free mice. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We demonstrate that global hepatic histone acetylation states measured by mass spectrometry remained largely unchanged despite loss of luminal and portal vein SCFAs after antibiotic-mediated microbiota depletion. In contrast to stable hepatic histone acetylation states, we see robust hepatic transcriptomic alterations after microbiota depletion. Additionally, neither dietary supplementation with supraphysiologic levels of SCFA nor the induction of hepatocyte proliferation in the absence of microbiota-derived SCFAs led to alterations in global hepatic histone acetylation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that microbiota-dependent landscaping of the hepatic epigenome through global histone acetylation is static in nature, while the hepatic transcriptome is responsive to alterations in the gut microbiota.
Assuntos
Ácidos Graxos Voláteis/metabolismo , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Histona Acetiltransferases/metabolismo , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BLRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Weight change offers the simplest indication of a patient's recovery after an operation. There have been no studies that have thoroughly investigated postoperative weight dynamics after pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to define postoperative weight change after a pancreatectomy and determine factors associated with optimal and poor weight trajectories. METHODS: From 2004 to 2019, 1,090 proximal (65%) and distal (35%) pancreatectomies were performed in patients with adequate data in the medical records. Patient weights were acquired preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 3, and 12. Optimal (top quartile, weight restoration) and poor (bottom quartile, persistent weight loss) postoperative weight cohorts were identified at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The median percentage weight change 1 year postpancreatectomy was -6.6% (interquartile range: -1.4% to -12.5%), -7.8% for proximal pancreatectomy, and -4.2% for distal pancreatectomy. For most patients (interquartile range cohort), the median percentage weight change at 1, 3, and 12 months was -6.2%, -7.2%, and -6.6%. The independent factors associated with weight restoration were age <65, nonobesity (body mass index <30kg/m2), receiving total parenteral nutrition/total enteral nutrition preoperatively, experiencing preoperative weight loss >10%, distal pancreatectomy, not undergoing vascular resection, and no readmission within 30 days. Conversely, persistent weight loss was associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists classes III to IV, obesity, malignancy, proximal pancreatectomy, blood loss ≥350mL, and experiencing readmission within 30 days. Focusing on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 372) patients, the factors associated with persistent weight loss were obesity, proximal pancreatectomy, and experiencing recurrence within 1 year; however, weight cohorts were not associated with overall survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. CONCLUSION: These data define weight kinetics after pancreatectomy. Ultimately, postoperative weight trajectories appear to be largely predetermined but may be mitigated by limiting readmissions and complications. Clinicians should use these data to identify patients who continue to lose weight between the first and third month postoperatively with a high suspicion for the requirement of nutritional monitoring or other interventions.
Assuntos
Trajetória do Peso do Corpo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Apoio Nutricional/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/fisiopatologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obese patients may have unrecognized primary aldosteronism due to high rates of concomitant hypertension. We hypothesized that obesity impacts the diagnosis and management of patients with primary aldosteronism. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all primary aldosteronism patients (n = 418) who underwent adrenal vein sampling (1997-2017). Patients were classified by body mass index as obese (body mass index ≥35) or nonobese (body mass index <35) and diagnostic evaluation was compared between groups. Within the operative cohort (n = 285), primary outcomes were changes in both blood pressure and antihypertensive medications after adrenalectomy. Secondary outcome was clinical resolution by Primary Aldosteronism Surgery Outcomes criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients were obese. Obese patients were more likely to be male (67.8% vs 56.1%, P = .025), somewhat younger (51.5 vs 54.4 years old, P < .012), and require more preoperative antihypertensive medications (6.7 vs 5.7, P = .04) than nonobese patients. Obese patients had lesser rates of radiologic evidence of adrenal tumors (68.4 vs 77.9%, P = .038) despite similar rates of lateralization on adrenal vein sampling. In the operative subset, obese patients had somewhat smaller tumors on final pathology (1.1 vs 1.5 cm, P = .014) but similar rates of complete and partial clinical resolution (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Obese primary aldosteronism patients have lesser rates of localization by imaging, likely due to smaller tumor size, however, experience similar benefit from adrenalectomy.