RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although RT has improved the survival of the population with ESRD due to all causes, renal outcomes in SLE are controversial. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and evolution of the patients and the kidney transplant in LN, and compare it with patients transplanted for other causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, analytical, single-center study in which records of patients undergoing nephrotransplantation for LN were analyzed. They were compared with a group of patients transplanted at the same center for other causes of ESRD. RESULTS: 41 patients with kidney transplant due to SLE and 89 transplanted due to other causes of ESRD were registered. Graft loss occurred in 12 (29.26%) patients with LN and 34 (38.2%) patients in the comparison group (p = .428). Only one case (4.8%) presented reactivation of the LN in the graft, without graft loss. Median graft survival was 73.1 months in the LN group and 66.3 months in the comparison group (p = .221). A total of 8 (19.5%) patients with LN and 11 (12.4%) without LN died (p = .42), with infections being the main cause in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in graft and patient survival. In a sub-analysis of 28 patients with LN with aPL study, 4 thrombotic events were observed, in 3 different patients, in the aPL-positive group. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of causes of graft loss and graft survival (positive aFL 75.7 months vs negative aFL 72.7 months, p= .96). There were also no differences in mortality between the groups (p = .61). CONCLUSION: Patients transplanted for LN did not differ from the control population in terms of graft and patient survival. Infections were the main cause of death, so prophylaxis and vaccination continue to be a fundamental pillar in the prevention of infections in immunocompromised patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often mimics symptoms of other diseases, and the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis may be long in some of these patients. Aims: To describe the characteristics associated with the time to SLE diagnosis and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in patients with SLE from a Latin American inception cohort. METHODS: Patients were from a multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin-American SLE inception cohort. All participating centers had specialized lupus clinics. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory, disease activity, damage, and mortality between those with a longer and a shorter time to diagnosis were compared using descriptive statistical tests. Multivariable Cox regression models with damage accrual and mortality as the end points were performed, adjusting for age at SLE diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, level of education, and highest dose of prednisone for damage accrual, plus highest dose of prednisone, baseline SLEDAI, and baseline SDI for mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1437 included in these analyses, the median time to diagnosis was 6.0 months (Q1-Q3 2.4-16.2); in 721 (50.2%) the time to diagnosis was longer than 6 months. Patients whose diagnosis took longer than 6 months were more frequently female, older at diagnosis, of Mestizo ethnicity, not having medical insurance, and having "non-classic" SLE symptoms. Longer time to diagnosis had no impact on either damage accrual (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.28, p = 0.300) or mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88-2.12, p = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: In this inception cohort, a maximum time of 24 months with a median of 6 months to SLE diagnosis had no apparent negative impact on disease outcomes (damage accrual and mortality).

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between patients' characteristics and disease activity in an Argentine lupus registry. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Disease activity was stratified into: Remission off-treatment: SLEDAI = 0, without prednisone and immunosuppressive drugs. Low disease activity Toronto Cohort (LDA-TC): SLEDAI ≤2, without prednisone or immunosuppressive drugs. Modified lupus low disease activity (mLLDAS): SLEDAI score of ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems and no new features, prednisone of ≤10 mg/day and/or immunosuppressive drugs (maintenance dose) and Active disease: SLEDAI score of >4 and prednisone >10 mg/day and immunosuppressive drugs. A descriptive analysis and logistic regression model were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1346 patients were included. Of them, 1.6% achieved remission off steroids, 0.8% LDA-TC, 12.1% mLLDAS and the remaining 85.4% had active disease. Active disease was associated with younger age (p ≤ 0.001), a shorter time to diagnosis (p ≤ 0.001), higher frequency of hospitalizations (p ≤ 0.001), seizures (p = 0.022), serosal disease (p ≤ 0.001), nephritis (p ≤ 0.001), higher SDI (p ≤ 0.001), greater use of immunosuppressive therapies and higher doses of prednisone compared to those on mLLDAS. In the multivariable analysis, the variables associated with active disease were the presence of pleuritis (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007), persistent proteinuria (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.5; p ≤ 0.011), nephritis (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.6; p = .018) and hospitalizations (OR 8.9, 95% CI 5.3-16.0; p ≤ 0.001) whereas age at entry into the registry was negatively associated with it (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.9-1.0; p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Active disease was associated with shorter time to diagnosis, worse outcomes (SDI and hospitalizations) and renal, neurological and serosal disease.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción: el progreso en los tratamientos para el lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) resultó en una disminución de la mortalidad; sin embargo, la enfermedad cardiovascular y las complicaciones infecciosas aún son las principales causas de muerte. La evidencia apoya la participación del sistema inmunológico en la generación de la placa aterosclerótica, así como su conexión con las enfermedades autoinmunes. Objetivos: describir la frecuencia de eventos cardiovasculares (ECV) en el Registro de Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico de la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología (RELESSAR) transversal, así como sus principales factores de riesgo asociados. Materiales y métodos: estudio descriptivo y transversal para el cual se tomaron los pacientes ingresados en el registro RELESSAR transversal. Se describieron las variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, las comorbilidades, score de actividad y daño. ECV se definió como la presencia de al menos una de las siguientes patologías: enfermedad arterial periférica, cardiopatía isquémica o accidente cerebrovascular. El evento clasificado para el análisis fue aquel posterior al diagnóstico del LES. Se conformaron dos grupos macheados por edad y sexo 1:2. Resultados: 1515 pacientes mayores de 18 años participaron del registro. Se describieron 80 pacientes con ECV (5,3%). En este análisis se incluyeron 240 pacientes conformando dos grupos. La edad media fue de 47,8 (14,4) y 47,6 (14,2) en el grupo con y sin ECV respectivamente. Los pacientes con ECV tuvieron mayor duración del LES en meses, mayor índice de Charlson, mayor SLICC (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology), mayor frecuencia de manifestaciones neurológicas, síndrome antifosfolípido, hospitalizaciones y uso de ciclofosfamida. Las únicas variables asociadas en el análisis multivariado fueron el índice de Charlson (p=0,004) y el SLICC (p<0,001). Conclusiones: los ECV influyen significativamente en nuestros pacientes, y se asocian a mayor posibilidad de daño irreversible y comorbilidades.

Abstract Introduction: progress in treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has resulted in a decrease in mortality; however, cardiovascular and infectious diseases remain the leading causes of death. Evidence supports the involvement of the immune system in the generation of atherosclerotic plaque, as well as its connection to autoimmune diseases. Objectives: to describe the frequency of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the cross-sectional RELESSAR registry, as well as its associated variables. Materials and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed using patients admitted to the cross-sectional RELESSAR registry. Sociodemographic variables, clinical variables, comorbidities, activity and damage scores were described. CVD was defined as at least one of the following: peripheral arterial disease, ischemic heart disease, or cerebrovascular accident. All patients with at least one CVD were included in our analysis (heart attack, central nervous system vascular disease, and peripheral arteries atherosclerotic disease). The event classified for the analysis was that after the diagnosis of SLE. SLE diagnosis was previous to CVD. Two groups matched by age and sex, 1:2 were formed. Results: a total of 1515 patients older than 18 years participated in the registry. Eighty patients with CVD (5.3%) were described in the registry. Two-hundred and forty patients were included, according to two groups. The mean age was 47.8 (SD 14.4) and 47.6 (SD 14.2) in patients with and without CVD, respectively. Patients with CVD had a longer duration of SLE in months, a higher Charlson index, a higher SLICC, increased frequency of neurological manifestations, antiphospholipid syndrome, hospitalizations, and use of cyclophosphamide. The associated variables in the multivariate were the Charlson Index (p=0.004) and the SLICC (p<0.001). Conclusions: CVDs have a significant influence on our patients, being associated with a greater possibility of damage and comorbidities.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The species Peperomia inaequalifolia, commonly known as congona, is a succulent herbaceous plant belonging to the Piperaceae family, which is used for different purposes in traditional medicine. In this study, the chemical composition, enantiomeric distribution, and biological activity of essential oil isolated from the leaves of this species was determined. Hydrodistillation was used to isolate the essential oil. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was used to determine the qualitative composition, a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was used to determine quantitative composition, and gas chromatography on an enantioselective column was used to determine enantiomeric distribution. Antibacterial activity was determined using the broth microdilution method, for which we used three Gram-positive cocci bacteria, a Gram-positive bacilli bacterium, and three Gram-negative bacilli bacteria. 2,2'-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical cations and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydryl (DPPH) radicals were used as reagents for determining the antioxidant activity of the essential oil. The spectrophotometric method was used to analyze the acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effect of the essential oil. The yield of leaves in essential oil was 0.16 ± 0.01% (v/w). Forty-three chemical compounds were identified in the essential oil, which represent 97.46% of the total composition. Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons were the most representative group, with 24 compounds (21.63%). The principal constituents were found to be elemicin (27.44 ± 1.35%), bisabolol <α-> (17.76 ± 1.38), myristicin (15.45 ± 0.86), methyl eugenol (6.22 ± 0.24), viridiflorene (6.81 ± 0.10), and safrole (6.68 ± 0.23). Three pairs of enantiomers were identified in the essential oil of Peperomia inaequalifolia. Essential oil presented a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4000 µg/mL against Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. The antioxidant activity of the essential oil was strong according to the DPPH and ABTS methods, with a half radical scavenging capacity (SC50) of 293.76 ± 3.12 µg/mL and 226.86 ± 0.05 µg/mL, respectively. Additionally, the essential oil reported moderate anticholinesterase activity, with an IC50 of 43.93 ± 1.05 µg/mL.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of the occurrence of severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and its impact on damage accrual and mortality in SLE patients. METHODS: Factors associated with time to severe AIHA (hemoglobin level ≤7 g/dL) occurring from the onset of SLE symptoms were examined by Cox proportional hazards regressions. The association of severe AIHA with mortality was examined by logistic regression analyses while its impact on damage was by negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Of 1,349 patients, 49 (3.6%) developed severe AIHA over a mean (SD) follow-up time of 5.4 (3.8) years. The median time from the first clinical manifestation to severe AIHA was 111 days (IQR 43-450). By multivariable analysis, male sex (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.02-4.75, p = 0.044), and higher disease activity at diagnosis (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.025) were associated with a shorter time to severe AIHA occurrence. Of the SLEDAI descriptors, only hematologic (leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia) showed a certain trend toward significance in the multivariable analysis (HR 2.36, 95% CI 0.91-6.13, p = 0.0772). Severe AIHA contributed neither to damage nor to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Severe AIHA occurs during the early course of SLE. Male sex and higher disease activity at diagnosis emerged as independent predictors of a shorter time to severe AIHA occurrence. Although not statistically significant, hematological abnormalities at SLE diagnosis could predict the occurrence of severe AIHA in a shorter time. Damage and mortality did not seem to be impacted by the occurrence of severe AIHA.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.

Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: las necesidades y perspectivas de los pacientes son determinantes para tratar la artritis reumatoidea (AR). Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la respuesta inadecuada a los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) sobre la satisfacción con el tratamiento, los resultados y las perspectivas de pacientes adultos con control inadecuado de la AR de actividad moderada/alta. Materiales y métodos: se evaluó la satisfacción mediante el cuestionario Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) v1.4. Se recolectaron datos sobre la calidad de vida, la adherencia y las estrategias de manejo. Se presentan los resultados para Argentina, Chile y Uruguay (n=202). Resultados: el promedio de la escala de satisfacción global TSQM fue de 62,3±21,8. El 83% informó buena adherencia. Las principales expectativas del tratamiento fueron "alivio duradero de los síntomas" y "menos dolor articular". El 53,47% prefirió tratamiento oral y el 75,74% eligió un rápido inicio de acción. El efecto secundario menos aceptado fue "mayor riesgo de neoplasias". Se planificó rotar el DMARD en el 55% de los casos. De estos, el 84,7% se consideraron terapias avanzadas. La mayoría estaba abierto a un esquema combinado, pero el 25,2% prefirió no utilizarlo. Conclusiones: los resultados reafirman el compromiso con las estrategias treat-to-target, considerando la individualización de las decisiones terapéuticas en el contexto regional.

Introduction: patients' needs and perspectives are determinants for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: to evaluate the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, outcomes and perspectives of adult patients with inadequate control of moderate/high activity RA. Materials and methods: satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM v1.4 questionnaire. Data on quality of life, adherence and management strategies were collected. Results are presented for Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (n=202). Results: the mean of the TSQM global satisfaction score was 62.3±21.8. Eighty-three percent reported good adherence. The main expectations of treatment were "lasting relief of symptoms" and "less joint pain". The 53.47% of patients preferred an oral treatment; 75.74% chose a rapid onset of action. The least accepted side effect was "increased risk of malignant neoplasms". Fifty-five percent planned to rotate DMARD. Of these, advanced therapies were considered in only 84.7%. Most were open to a combination treatment, but 25.2% preferred not to use it. Conclusions: the results reaffirm the commitment to treat-to-target strategies, considering the individualization of therapeutic decisions in the regional context.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción. El dolor es un síntoma frecuente en el paciente oncológico en fase terminal e impacta todos los aspectos de su vida; en su control el personal de enfermería implementa cuidados farmacológicos y no farmacológicos (masaje, relajación, musicoterapia, entre otros). El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las percepciones del paciente oncológico en fase terminal frente a las intervenciones de enfermería no farmacológicas para el manejo del dolor en un hospital público de Bogotá en el 2021. Metodología. Estudio cualitativo-fenomenológico; participaron con muestra teórica y muestreo a conveniencia 12 personas, a quienes se les aplicó entrevista semiestructurada, las cuales fueron grabadas, transcritas y analizadas con codificación abierta, axial y selectiva por medio del programa NVivo versión 12. Resultados. Los participantes tuvieron una edad promedio de 67 años y la mayoría fueron hombres (n:8; 67%); las categorías principales de análisis fueron 1) percepción de dolor; 2) conoce técnicas no farmacológicas para el manejo del dolor; 3) conocimiento de las enfermeras frente a las intervenciones no farmacológicas;y 4) experiencias de las técnicas no farmacológicas. Discusión. El paciente oncológico valora y percibe las intervenciones de enfermería no farmacológicas como procedimientos que mejoran su parte física y emocional, permiten que la calidad de vida se mantenga; las prácticas alivian el dolor y lo hace sentir mejor. Conclusiones. Los participantes perciben que, aunque el dolor es fuerte e insoportable, las intervenciones no farmacológicas hacen parte de su proceso en la lucha contra su patología y ayudan a aliviar las molestias.

Introduction. Pain is a frequent symptom in terminal cancer patients and impacts every aspect of their lives. For managing pain, nursing staff implements pharmacological and non-pharmacological (massages, relaxation, music therapy and others) care. The objective of this study was to identify the perceptions of terminal cancer patients in light of non-pharmacological nursing interventions for pain management at a public hospital in Bogotá in 2021. Methodology. A qualitative-phenomenological study. 12 people participated in through theoretical and convenience sampling and answered semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed and analyzed with open, axial and selective coding through the Nvivo program, version 12. Results. Participants had an average age of 67 years and most were men (n:8; 67%); the main analyzed categories were 1) perception of pain; 2) knowing non-pharmacological techniques for pain management; 3) the nurses' knowledge of non-pharmacological interventions; and 4) experiences from non-pharmacological techniques. Discussion. Cancer patients assess and perceive non-pharmacological nursing interventions as procedures that improve their physical and emotional component and maintain quality of life. The practices alleviate pain and make patients feel better. Conclusions. Participants perceive that, though the pain is intense and unbearable, non-pharmacological interventions are part of their process of fighting their pathologies and help relieve discomforts.

Introdução. A dor é um sintoma frequente em pacientes com câncer em estágio terminal e afeta todos os aspectos da sua vida; para seu controle a equipe de enfermagem implementa cuidados farmacológicos e não farmacológicos (massagem, relaxamento, musicoterapia, entre outros). O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar as percepções de pacientes com câncer em fase terminal sobre as intervenções não farmacológicas de enfermagem para o manejo da dor em um hospital público de Bogotá em 2021. Metodologia. Estudo qualitativo-fenomenológico. Participaram 12 pessoas com amostra teórica e amostragem por conveniência, às quais foi aplicada entrevista semiestruturada, as quais foram gravadas, transcritas e analisadas com codificação aberta, axial e seletiva por meio do programa NVivo versão 12. Resultados. Os participantes tinham idade média de 67 anos e a maioria eram homens (n:8; 67%). As principais categorias de análise foram: 1) percepção da dor; 2) conhece técnicas não farmacológicas para o manejo da dor; 3) conhecimento das enfermeiras sobre as intervenções não farmacológicas; e 4) experiências de técnicas não farmacológicas. Discussão. O paciente oncológico valoriza e percebe as intervenções de enfermagem não farmacológicas como procedimentos que melhoram sua parte física e emocional, permitem a manutenção da qualidade de vida. As práticas aliviam a dor e fazem o paciente se sentir melhor. Conclusões. Os participantes percebem que, embora a dor seja forte e insuportável, as intervenções não farmacológicas fazem parte do seu processo no combate à sua patologia e ajudam a aliviar o desconforto.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El nevo melanocítico congénito gigante es una lesión pigmentada de gran tamaño presente al nacimiento. Su incidencia es de 1/1.000-500.000 recién nacidos. La localización más frecuente es el tronco posterior, la cara, el cuero cabelludo y las extremidades. El objetivo que buscamos con la presentación de este caso clínico es ofrecer una revisión actualizada sobre la evaluación al nacimiento, conducta y tratamiento a seguir por los neonatólogos y pediatra de atención primaria ante la inesperada presencia de las dermatopatías no tan frecuentes como la que nos ocupa. Se trata de un recién nacido que nace con un "nevo melanocítico congénito gigante" y que además se asocia con un hemangioma hepático diagnosticado en el ingreso. Valoramos la importancia de esta patología que radica en los problemas impactantes desde el punto de vista estético, quirúrgico y emocional que pueden originar en el paciente y sus familiares, además de la posible asociación con otras malformaciones del sistema nervioso central y en algunos de ellos, el riesgo de ser el origen de un melanoma.

The giant congenital melanocytic nevus is a large pigmented lesion present at birth. Its incidence is 1 / 1,000-500,000 newborns. The most frequent location is the posterior trunk, the face, the scalp and the extremities. We decided with the presentation of this clinical case to offer an updated review on the evaluation at birth, behavior and treatment to be followed by neonatologists, primary care pediatrician before the unexpected presence of dermatopathies not as frequent as the one we are dealing with today, the "nevus" giant congenital melanocytic ". The importance of this pathology lies in the impactful problems from the aesthetic, surgical and emotional point of view that can originate in the patient and their relatives, in addition to the possible association with other malformations of the central nervous system and in some of them, the risk of being the origin of a melanoma.

O nevo melanocítico congênito gigante é uma grande lesão pigmentada presente ao nascimento. Sua incidência é de 1/1.000-500.000 recém-nascidos. A localização mais frequente é o tronco posterior, face, couro cabeludo e extremidades. O objetivo que buscamos com a apresentação deste caso clínico é oferecer uma revisão atualizada sobre a avaliação ao nascimento, comportamento e tratamento a ser acompanhado por neonatologistas e pediatras da atenção primária na presença inesperada de dermatopatias não tão frequentes quanto a em questão. É um recém-nascido nascido com um "nevo melanocítico congênito gigante" e também está associado a um hemangioma hepático diagnosticado na admissão. Valorizamos a importância dessa patologia que reside nos problemas chocantes do ponto de vista estético, cirúrgico e emocional que podem se originar no paciente e em seus familiares, além da possível associação com outras malformações do sistema nervoso central e, em algumas de las, o risco de ser a origem do melanoma.

RESUMO

Introducción: en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas autoinmunes se recomienda la aplicación sistemática y secuencial de una serie de vacunas para la prevención de enfermedades transmisibles. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la proporción de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) que recibieron vacunación contra el coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materiales y métodos: se envió una encuesta anónima por correo electrónico o contacto por WhatsApp desde mayo a septiembre de 2021, con preguntas para evaluar la adherencia al esquema de vacunación recomendado en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas, así como temores, preferencias y adherencia al esquema de vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: se incluyeron 295 pacientes con ES. El 68,81% estaba vacunado contra el SARS-CoV-2 con al menos una dosis, de los cuales el 48,7% tenía dos dosis. El 84,75% refirió conversar con su médico sobre su esquema de vacunación general. Solo el 5,4% tenía las cuatro vacunas. El 93,56% manifestó voluntad de vacunarse contra el SARS-CoV-2; el 56,27% prefirió la vacuna Sputnik V. El 7,46% manifestó su voluntad de no vacunarse. Los factores que influyeron en la adherencia a la vacunación, con mayor frecuencia, fueron el miedo a contraer la infección por SARS-CoV-2 (86,1%) y las reacciones adversas (23,05%). Conclusiones: destacamos el hecho de que solo 6 meses después de que se dispusiera la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2, la mitad de los pacientes con ES tenía el esquema recomendado completo.

Introduction: in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, the systematic and sequential application of a series of vaccines is recommended for the prevention of communicable diseases. The objective was to estimate the proportion of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who received vaccination against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Materials and methods: since may to september 2021, an anonymous survey was sent by email or messaging app, containing questions to assess adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as fears, preferences and adherence to vaccination schedule against SARS-CoV-2. Results: 295 patients with SSc were included. 68.81% were vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 with at least one dose, 48.7% of this group had two doses. 84.75% reported talking to their doctor about their general vaccination schedule. Only 5.4% had all four vaccines. 93.56% expressed willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, 56.27% preferred the Sputnik V vaccine. 7.46% expressed their willingness to not be vaccinated. The factors that most frequently influenced adherence to vaccination were fear of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection (86.1%) and adverse reactions (23.05%). Conclusions: we highlight the fact that only 6 months after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 became available, half of the patients with SSc had the full recommended schedule.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Lupus nephritis (LN) affects about a third of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Although the use of conventional therapy has significantly improved the prognosis of LN, the response to treatment remains suboptimal, with high rates of relapse and the occurrence of end-stage kidney disease. The implementation of new diagnostic and treatment strategies aimed at improving these outcomes represents a necessary paradigm shift in the management of LN.Herein, we discuss different points of view regarding these still unresolved issues; these comments represent a debate that took place during the virtual congress of the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) and which was organized by the PANLAR Lupus Study Group, GLADEL (Grupo Latino Americano De Estudio del Lupus) on August 15, 2021.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to describe the main characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Argentina and to examine the influence of ethnicity on the expression of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RELESSAR is a multicentre register carried out by 106 researchers from 67 rheumatologic Argentine centres. It is a cross-sectional study of SLE (1982/1997 ACR) patients. RELESSAR electronic database includes demographic, cumulative SLE manifestations, SELENA-SLEDAI, SLICC-SDI, Katz's severity and Charlson's comorbidity indexes and treatment patterns. RESULTS: We included 1,610 patients, 91.7% were female with a median age at diagnosis of 28.1 ± 12.8; 96.2% met ≥4 ACR 1982/97 criteria. Frequent manifestations were arthritis (83.5%), malar rash (79.5%), photosensitivity (75.3%), haematological (63.8%) and renal disease (47.4%), antinuclear antibodies (96%), anti-dsDNA (66.5%) and anti-Smith antibodies (29%). The mean Selena-SLEDAI score at last visit was 3.18 (SD 4.3) and mean SDI was 1 (SD 1.3). The accumulated treatments most frequently used were antimalarials (90.4%), corticosteroids (90%), azathioprine (31.8%), intravenous cyclophosphamide (30.2%), mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid (24.5%), methotrexate (19.3%), belimumab 5.3% and rituximab 5.1%. Refractory lupus was diagnosed in 9.3% of the cases. The main causes of death were lupus activity (25.0%), activity and concomitant infections (25.0%), infections (18.2%), vascular disease (13.6%) and cancer (4.5%). Mortality was associated with higher SLEDAI, Katz, damage indexes and comorbidities. Of the 1610 patients included, 44.6% were Caucasian, 44.5% Mestizo, 8.1% Amerindian and 1.2% Afro-Latin American. Mestizo patients had higher male representation, low socioeconomic status, more inadequate medical coverage, fewer formal years of education and shorter disease duration. Polyadenopathies and Raynaud's phenomenon were more frequent in Caucasians. In the logistic regression analysis higher damage index (OR 1.28, CI 95% 1.02-1.61, p = 0.03) remained associated to mestizo ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest number of adult patients with SLE studied in Argentina. Caucasian patients were differentiated by having Raynaud's phenomenon and polyadenopathy more frequently, while patients of Mestizo origin had higher damage indexes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: el lupus es una enfermedad compleja y varias veces de difícil abordaje. Alcanzar la remisión es uno de los objetivos, incorporando opciones terapéuticas. Objetivos: describir las características generales de los pacientes según el estado de la enfermedad y el uso de belimumab. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal, registro RELESSAR. Se definió el estado de la enfermedad como: remisión: SLEDAI=0 y sin corticoides; baja actividad de la enfermedad: SLEDAI >0 y ≤4 y sin corticoides; control no óptimo: SLEDAI >4 y cualquier dosis de corticoides. Resultados: se incluyeron 1.277 pacientes, 23,4% en remisión, 12,6% en baja actividad y 63,8% con control no óptimo. En este último grupo eran más jóvenes y con menor duración de la enfermedad; presentaban mayores índices de actividad y cronicidad, y mayor empleo de inmunosupresores. Solo el 22,3% de los pacientes con criterio potencial de uso de belimumab (lupus eritematoso sistémico activo a pesar del tratamiento estándar) lo recibía en ese momento. Las variables asociadas a hospitalizaciones fueron: terapia con corticoides, ciclofosfamida y mayor SLICC. Conclusiones: se refleja la complejidad del manejo de estos pacientes y se visualizan aspectos estructurales como la desigualdad. El uso del belimumab resultaría beneficioso en los pacientes seleccionados.

Introduction: lupus is a complex disease and often difficult to approach. Achieving remission is one of the objectives, incorporating therapeutic options. Objectives: to describe the characteristics of the patients and the use of belimumab, according to the status of the disease. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study. Patients of the RELESSAR registry. Stratification: Remission: SLEDAI=0 and without corticosteroids. Low disease activity SLEDAI> 0 and ≤4 and without corticosteroids and non-optimal control: SLEDAI> 4 and any dose of corticosteroids. Results: a total of 1,277 patients were included, 23.4% in remission, 12.6% in low disease activity and 63.8% in non-optimal control. The last group was younger and had a shorter duration of the disease. They had higher activity and chronicity indices and greater use of immunosuppressants. Only 22.3% of the patients with potential criteria for the use of belimumab (activity disease despite standard treatment) were receiving it. The variables associated with hospitalizations were: corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and higher SLICC. Those associated with severe infection: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, corticosteroids, and higher SLICC. Conclusions: the complexity of the management of these patients is reflected, visualizing structural aspects such as inequality. The use of belimumab could be beneficial in selected patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: el lupus es una enfermedad compleja y varias veces de difícil abordaje. Alcanzar la remisión es uno de los objetivos, incorporando opciones terapéuticas. Objetivos: describir las características generales de los pacientes según el estado de la enfermedad y el uso de belimumab. Materiales y métodos: estudio de corte transversal, registro RELESSAR. Se definió el estado de la enfermedad como: remisión: SLEDAI=0 y sin corticoides; baja actividad de la enfermedad: SLEDAI >0 y ≤4 y sin corticoides; control no óptimo: SLEDAI >4 y cualquier dosis de corticoides. Resultados: se incluyeron 1.277 pacientes, 23,4% en remisión, 12,6% en baja actividad y 63,8% con control no óptimo. En este último grupo eran más jóvenes y con menor duración de la enfermedad; presentaban mayores índices de actividad y cronicidad, y mayor empleo de inmunosupresores. Solo el 22,3% de los pacientes con criterio potencial de uso de belimumab (lupus eritematoso sistémico activo a pesar del tratamiento estándar) lo recibía en ese momento. Las variables asociadas a hospitalizaciones fueron: terapia con corticoides, ciclofosfamida y mayor SLICC. Conclusiones: se refleja la complejidad del manejo de estos pacientes y se visualizan aspectos estructurales como la desigualdad. El uso del belimumab resultaría beneficioso en los pacientes seleccionados.

Introduction: lupus is a complex disease and often difficult to approach. Achieving remission is one of the objectives, incorporating therapeutic options. Objectives: to describe the characteristics of the patients and the use of belimumab, according to the status of the disease. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study. Patients of the RELESSAR registry. Stratification: Remission: SLEDAI=0 and without corticosteroids. Low disease activity SLEDAI> 0 and ≤4 and without corticosteroids and non-optimal control: SLEDAI> 4 and any dose of corticosteroids. Results: a total of 1,277 patients were included, 23.4% in remission, 12.6% in low disease activity and 63.8% in non-optimal control. The last group was younger and had a shorter duration of the disease. They had higher activity and chronicity indices and greater use of immunosuppressants. Only 22.3% of the patients with potential criteria for the use of belimumab (activity disease despite standard treatment) were receiving it. The variables associated with hospitalizations were: corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and higher SLICC. Those associated with severe infection: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, corticosteroids, and higher SLICC. Conclusions: the complexity of the management of these patients is reflected, visualizing structural aspects such as inequality. The use of belimumab could be beneficial in selected patients.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In this observational, analytical, cross-sectional study we aimed to describe the impact of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) on work productivity and activities of daily living (ADL) to assess the association between ADL impairment and clinical manifestations and to compare ADL impairment according to patients' socioeconomic condition. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with pSS attending 11 centres from Argentina were included. To evaluate work productivity and ADL impairment, a work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI) was used. A multiple linear regression model was performed, considering deterioration on ADL due to health as a dependent variable, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: 252 patients were included, 98.4% were women, with a mean age of 52.6 years (±14.8). The average percentage of time lost due to health was 15.7 hours (±30.1 95% CI: 9.6-21.9); the decrease in work productivity was 27.2 (±30.2 95% CI: 21.3-33.1), the total disability was 33.7 (±35.8 95% CI: 26.4-4) and ADL deterioration was 34.2 (±30.9. 95% CI: 30.4-38). In the multivariate analysis, xerostomia, arthritis and depression showed significant and independent association. The mean of ADL impairment was 38.2 (±30.7) in patients attending public centres versus 28 (± 30.6) in private centres, which was a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: We found a compromise in all WPAI domains. Arthritis, xerostomia and depression were associated significantly and independently with ADL impairment. Deterioration in ADL was greater in patients treated in public centres. Considering these aspects will allow a better understanding of patients who suffer from this disease.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN Las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo (IS) en pacientes oncológicos neutropénicos constituyen una patología de relevancia y se asocian a un aumento de la morbimortalidad. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las características epidemiológicas y microbiológicas de los episodios de IS en pacientes adultos neutropénicos con neoplasias hematológicas (NH) y neoplasias sólidas (NS). Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en dos hospitales de tercer nivel entre 2009 y 2016. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes neutropénicos mayores de 18años con NH y NS que presentaron episodios de IS. Se excluyeron aquellos con neoplasias dermatológicas no melanoma. Se identificaron 143 episodios de IS, de los cuales el 80,4% fueron en personas con NH. El 97,9% de los pacientes tuvieron neutropenia de alto riesgo, sin diferencia entre los grupos NH y NS. Los orígenes más frecuentes de IS fueron bacteriemia primaria (46,9%) e infección asociada a catéter (21%), sin diferencias significativas entre grupos. El 74,1% de los aislamientos fueron bacilos gram negativos yEscherichiacolifue el microorganismo más frecuente (32,1%). El coco gram positivo más frecuentemente aislado fueStaphylococcusaureus(28,1%), seguido del grupo de los estafilococos coagulasa negativos (ECN), sin diferencias entre ambos tipos de neoplasias. El 67,5% de los ECN fueron multirresistentes; solo el 11,1% de los aislamientos deS. aureusfue resistente a la meticilina. El 17,6% de los aislamientos deE. coliy el 27,6% de los deKlebsiellapneumoniaefueron multirresistentes. No hubo diferencias en la frecuencia de aislamientos multirresistentes al comparar entre ambos tipos de neoplasia. Como conclusión, las IS en pacientes neutropénicos fueron más frecuentes en pacientes con NH y las causaron, principalmente, bacilos gram negativos. Se observó una elevada mortalidad en los pacientes neutropénicos con IS.

ABSTRACT Bloodstream infections (BI) are relevant in neutropenic patients because they are associated with an increased number of complications and death. The objective was determinate the epidemiologic and microbiologic features of the BI in neutropenic patients with solid neoplasm (SN) and hematologic neoplasm (HN). Retrospective study in two third level hospitals between 2009 and 2016. They were included all the patients older than 18 years-old with active oncologic disease and neutropenia, who had BI. Patients with dermatologic cancer other than melanoma where excluded. A total of 143 BI in neutropenic were observed, of which 80.4% occurred in HN. Around 97.9% of the patients had a high-risk neutropenia without differences between both groups. The most frequent site of BI was primary bacteremia (46.9%) and catheter-associated infection (21%), without significant differences between the two groups. The gram negatives bacilli (GNB) predominated over the gram positive cocci (GPC) and they represented 74.1% of the isolated bacteria, beingEscherichia colithe most frequent (32.8%). Among the gram positive cocci,Staphylococcus aureus(28.1%) was the most frequent isolated, followed by coagulase-negativeStaphylococci(CNS). There were no differences in microbiological isolates between both groups. With regard to the antimicrobial susceptibility 67.5% of the CNS, 17.6% of theE. coliand 27.6% of theKlebsiella pneumoniaewere multiresistant with no differences between both groups. Only 11.1% of S. aureus isolates were methicillin resistant. In conclusion BI of the neutropenic patients where most frequents within patients with HN, GNB were the main microbiological isolates. High mortality was observed in neutropenic patients with BI.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Individuals with malignancies and COVID-19 have a lower survival compared with the general population. However, the information about the impact of COVID-19 on the whole hematological population is scarce. We aimed to describe the 30th day overall survival (OS) after COVID-19 infection in patients with a hematological disease in Argentina. A completely anonymous survey from the Argentine Society of Hematology was delivered to all the hematologists in Argentina; it started in April 2020. A cut-off to analyze the data was performed in December 2020 and, finally, 419 patients were reported and suitable for the analysis (average age: 58 years, 90% with malignant diseases). After the COVID-19 diagnosis, the 30-day OS for the whole population was 80.2%. From the entire group (419), 101 (24.1%) individuals required intensive care unit admission, where the 30-day OS was 46.6%. Among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, the 30-day OS was 70.3%. Factors associated with a low OS were two or more comorbidities, an active hematological disease and history of chemotherapy. In individuals with the three factors, the 30-day OS was 49.6% while the 30-day OS in those without those factors was 100%. Patients with hematological diseases have a higher mortality than the general population. This group represents a challenge and requires careful decision-making of the treatment in order not to compromise the chances of cure.

El presente estudio tuvo por objetivo primario conocer la mortalidad de pacientes con enfermedad hematológica que presentaron infección por COVID-19 en Argentina. Para ello se difundió una encuesta desde la Sociedad Argentina de Hematología (SAH) entre los hematológos para informar sobre los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas y diagnóstico de infección por SARS- CoV-2, entre el 19/4/2020, y el 7/12/2020. Se incluyeron individuos de todas las edades con diagnóstico de enfermedad hematológica benigna o maligna e infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada por técnica de RTPCR. Se analizaron 419 pacientes (mediana 58 años; 90% enfermedades malignas). La supervivencia al día 30 fue de 80.2%. La supervivencia fue menor en aquellos que requirieron internación (74.2%), cuidados intensivos (46.6%) y asistencia respiratoria mecánica (36.8%). Entre los trasplantados alogénicos la supervivencia fue 70.3%. Los factores vinculados a la supervivencia global fueron las comorbilidades, el estado de la enfermedad al momento de la infección y el antecedente de quimioterapia. Se pudo establecer un score en el que aquellos que tuvieron un puntaje de 4 alcanzaron una supervivencia del 49.6% al día 30, mientras que la de los pacientes con score 0 fue del 100% a 30 días. En comparación con la población general, los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas presentan una mayor mortalidad vinculada al COVID-19, motivo por el cual es primordial definir pautas destinadas a disminuir la exposición de los mismos sin comprometer las posibilidades de beneficiarse del tratamiento de la enfermedad de base.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Individuals with malignancies and COVID-19 have a lower survival compared with the general population. However, the information about the impact of COVID-19 on the whole hematological population is scarce. We aimed to describe the 30th day overall survival (OS) after COVID-19 infection in pa tients with a hematological disease in Argentina. A completely anonymous survey from the Argentine Society of Hematology was delivered to all the hematologists in Argentina; it started in April 2020. A cut-off to analyze the data was performed in December 2020 and, finally, 419 patients were reported and suitable for the analysis (average age: 58 years, 90% with malignant diseases). After the COVID-19 diagnosis, the 30-day OS for the whole population was 80.2%. From the entire group (419), 101 (24.1%) individuals required intensive care unit admission, where the 30-day OS was 46.6%. Among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, the 30-day OS was 70.3%. Factors associated with a low OS were two or more comorbidities, an active hematological disease and history of chemotherapy. In individuals with the three factors, the 30-day OS was 49.6% while the 30-day OS in those without those factors was 100%. Patients with hematological diseases have a higher mortality than the general population. This group represents a challenge and requires careful decision-making of the treatment in order not to compromise the chances of cure.

Resumen El presente estudio tuvo por objetivo primario conocer la mortalidad de pacientes con enfermedad hematológica que presentaron infección por COVID-19 en Argentina. Para ello se difundió una encuesta desde la Sociedad Argentina de Hematología (SAH) entre los hematológos para informar sobre los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas y diagnóstico de infección por SARS- CoV-2, entre el 19/4/2020, y el 7/12/2020. Se incluyeron individuos de todas las edades con diagnóstico de enfermedad hematológica benigna o maligna e infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada por técnica de RT-PCR. Se analizaron 419 pacientes (mediana 58 años; 90% enfermedades malignas). La supervivencia al día 30 fue de 80.2%. La supervivencia fue menor en aquellos que requirieron internación (74.2%), cuidados intensivos (46.6%) y asistencia respiratoria mecánica (36.8%). Entre los trasplantados alogénicos la supervivencia fue 70.3%. Los factores vinculados a la supervivencia global fueron las comorbilidades, el estado de la enfermedad al momento de la infección y el antecedente de quimioterapia. Se pudo establecer un score en el que aquellos que tuvieron un puntaje de 4 alcanzaron una supervivencia del 49.6% al día 30, mientras que la de los pacientes con score 0 fue del 100% a 30 días. En comparación con la población general, los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas presentan una mayor mortalidad vinculada al COVID-19, motivo por el cual es primordial definir pautas destinadas a disminuir la exposición de los mismos sin comprometer las posibilidades de beneficiarse del tratamiento de la enfermedad de base.

Assuntos